Remembering that last time Cook hired for this position, he chose a toe-cutter, who proceeded to rip the soul out of the retail stores to cut costsI'm curious what the plan is, this time around.
Ahrendts' big achievement appears to be bringing a dated, exclusive brand into the 21st century, and I don't see how that fits Apple's situation. Apple prides itself in being a consumer brand, with quality products at reasonable prices.
What we seem to have here is someone who fits Apple's culture better than the last hireand knows how to focus the product line but we know nothing about Cook's intentions or Ahrendts' plans for Apple's customer experience.
Narrowing the product line, is up to Cook and the product people. Apple only has a clunky online store experience, compared to Amazon, where Apple is fettered by restrictive licensing agreements, not applied to Amazon, but otherwise it's a world leader. Apple's physical stores are world leading in all respects.
Maybe it is an apparent IN with Asia, but the brand is entirely different. The only similarity I can see here is that, like the fashion industry, Asia is able to quickly copy anything Apple does and dominate raw sales numbers due to cheap prices and poor quality.
Fashion probably has a much higher emphasis on bricks & mortar, as less people need to try on a MacBook Air before they buy
And Cook seems to want to get even more iPhone sales going through physical stores, but again the situation is controlled by kooky agreements with carriers, not any failing of Apple's vision.
I'd still like to see the figures for how well Burberry is doing in China, compared to Apple, because I think Apple is doing pretty well on its own