we'll see when we find out what the storage is - and with a new interface layer based around something very much like the current Apple remote for utility apps.
Apple gets 30% of the total profit on the over 6.5 billion apps that have been downloaded so far. Even if most of those are free, I'd say they're making quite a bit.
Isn't the app thing as much an indirect profit for Apple., i.e. they sell more iPhones and iPod Touch's because you can get apps for them? If the AppleTV had apps available, it immediately increases its desirability and therefore Apples profits.
Yeah, the naysayers are absolutely insane. Even if Apple is taking 1% off all the sold apps, they are doing well enough to keep the App store going and the app ability functioning and approving.
Maybe though, it will have apps...just not in the way we know apps NOW.
I can see them setting up apps like netflix for CONTENT. Not so much for games and twitter....which I agree, do you want twitter on your tv? I dont, but I digress.
Content plugins...... I can see apple inking deals and adding these content add-ons with quarterly updates vs the app store model. Hard Coded into the OS itself like the Netflix app/content.
$.02
Let's use our heads for a second here. The AppleTV brand name was NOT pulled at the "last second" (instead of iTV). Think about it, look at the case. It has a big Apple on it. You don't mass produce a plastic housing that has one name on it, then claim you changed it at the last second. Production doesn't work that way. It was ALWAYS AppleTV, period.
Of course!
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. Apple takes 30% of the revenue of all the apps sold. They would not be able to operate the store if they only took 1%. Credit card charges are more than that.
Perhaps your iPhone or iPad will act as the remote...ie you will see the app on your phone/pad and your finger touches will translate to the tv
simple
i see what you are saying, but it's just a matter of marketing.
something along these lines:
appleTV basic: as it is now (with apps), 99$
appleTV+: includes one dedicated AppRemote, allows multi-remote inputs, 149$
both of them work with iTouch/iPhone/iPad as remotes
Additional AppRemotes: 29$
Did anyone do an autopsy yet?
I am curious if Apple could fold AppleTV into the iPad-Pod-Phone stuff in time. Why not? Just need connectors to get image from device to screen. You could download or arrange TV all day, then go watch it at night with the same device you use to call people.
The melding of platforms will be ultimately beneficial for consumers and the industry. At the moment it seems like a decent step toward a logical conclusion about home entertainment, but it is still a way from what it should become to be seductively necessary for leisure time.
TV-phone-MP3-App-Game-Word Processor-Internet-Email-Chat device.... beautiful. It's probably 4 years off.
Yeah, the naysayers are absolutely insane. Even if Apple is taking 1% off all the sold apps, they are doing well enough to keep the App store going and the app ability functioning and approving.
Not one single word of this post makes any sense.
1. You say games without a dedicated controller won't be feasible. I'd like to present Exhibit A, the App Store that has existed for 2.5 years. Every game is without a dedicated controller.
2. This is absurd. Apple doesn't expect people to buy iPhones or iPads???I assure you, they do. What do you think the killer feature AirPlay revolves around? You're not going to be streaming anything from your aluminum remote to the
TV, I can promise you that.
3. No one said anything about Apps in their current form. That's about as logical as saying the iPad would be only iPhone Apps, Double Pixeled. No, of course not, Apps would be purposely written and designed to take advantage of the situation.
(Sigh, can't believe I have to break this down for people)
- Most iPhone/iPad games center around very basic controls that are not accuracy-based, rather timing-based.. Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Tap anywhere, Double Tap, Swipe Up, Down, Left, Right, etc................
All of these interactions can be done on an iPhone or iPad (DEDICATED CONTROLLER) while the game's imagery and video is pushed out in 720p to yourTV.
This, to me, sounds like it revolves solely around iPhone/iPad development, and won't require Apps to be stored on theTV. Apps/Games that push their visuals using AirPlay to the
TV, rather than Apps running on the
TV with the iPhone/iPad a wifi/bluetooth remote.
For me I am upset it will not be able to tie to my Time Capsule. I have a large iTunes library and a lot of it was purchased directly from Apple. To have me first download it to my iPad or iPhone then AirPlay it to the AppleTV is plain stupid! So if it can be cracked and then linked to an iTunes library I am sold on it!
Originally Posted by StarBlue
For me I am upset it will not be able to tie to my Time Capsule. I have a large iTunes library and a lot of it was purchased directly from Apple. To have me first download it to my iPad or iPhone then AirPlay it to the AppleTV is plain stupid! So if it can be cracked and then linked to an iTunes library I am sold on it!