Cue complaints that it’s not 32.
Cue the perpetual defenders now ripping Apple for "forcing too much RAM" into a computer when- as they have written countless times including throughout 2024: "8GB is
plenty for 99% of users."
But I expect crickets... as all that passion rolls
with whatever Apple rolls out. Such conviction in support of a point that evaporates as soon as Apple makes a change! Are people writing their
own GENUINE opinions or just towing the company line? (rhetorical- we know that one).
This should be a fun period in which Macs that still have 8GB base will see ongoing arguments of how 8GB is plenty for 99% but new Macs released this week with 16GB will NOT see any blasts against Apple for "forcing" too much RAM. In short: where Macs are sold with 8GB, that's ideal for any buyers and Macs sold with 16GB is also ideal for any buyers.
It reminds me of the time that in the same "big reveal" Apple rolled out an iPad with Retina and another without and Retina was
THE reason to upgrade to the former... but the latter didn't need Retina to be a fantastic buy... UNTIL the
next year when it too went Retina and then that become
THE reason to upgrade that one. It's dazzling how passionate opinions move in lockstep with a corporation's choices.
To all who dreamed of the day that base RAM would finally catch up with the times, enjoy your new iMac. And isn't it also dazzling how the "magical, special" RAM that had long bulleted lists to justify $200 for an addtional 8GB over Amazon prices for quantity 1 at retail 8GB was able to be "thrown in" here while keeping the price the
same? I call that TRUE VALUE for customers.
How nice to get MORE VALUE for the SAME money. I hope Apple does MORE of THIS going forward.