Some Pros need an Intel Mac still. I need one just to use Docker to deploy to AWS Intel based instances. Virtualization doesn't work.
You really think a student buying a $499 Mac mini (actually, $697 since they'll need a mouse and keyboard for it) is going to drop $1499 on the Studio display? It would make sense to offer a reasonably priced display for those type of buyers.Why? What Apple offers is already best-in-class.
I'd like to see desktop iPadOS devices introduced to continue the drive away from macOS. Now we have powerful tools and best-ever versions of Final Cut Pro and Logic Pro on iPadOS, it's time to go harder and faster in pursuit of the future.
WOW! That’s, like, 6 more Ms than Apple has! I just want as many Ms as can fit in a device!This is silly, I’m switching to Samsung. They are already on M8
Makes sense since Samsung is more reputable than Apple 🤣This is silly, I’m switching to Samsung. They are already on M8
Completely agree. A 24 inch 4.5K (same panel as the iMac) for $799-$999 would be great. $1500 for a 60hz LED is pretty disappointing imoYou really think a student buying a $499 Mac mini (actually, $697 since they'll need a mouse and keyboard for it) is going to drop $1499 on the Studio display? It would make sense to offer a reasonably priced display for those type of buyers.
That's nothing! Apple already had a M11:This is silly, I’m switching to Samsung. They are already on M8
Exactly what I’ve posted in other threads. The monitor costs 3 times more than the (mighty) Mac. How does that make any sense?You really think a student buying a $499 Mac mini (actually, $697 since they'll need a mouse and keyboard for it) is going to drop $1499 on the Studio display? It would make sense to offer a reasonably priced display for those type of buyers.
They need some better priced monitor choices - like they used to have.
Some people are even saying the m3 is even old now lol wanting the m4 nextBu…bu…but some people said M2 was too old. There was no doubt M3 would appear at WWDC.
That too, a lot of the discussion is around it being a halo product, the best of what the Mac can be. But to be honest, even in Windows PC environments, towers are an exceptionally rare sight these days. Windows workstations themselves are being replaced by small form factor devices which would be the Mac Studio on the Apple side. Again, not saying there isn't a market, but is justifiable for Apple to pursue in volume? Especially when so much of the target audience is already tied up in a Linux/Windows ecosystem. The hardware, software tools (much of proprietary) is optimized for Windows and Linux.Or Apple could scrap it altogether
And how about the list of apps that still haven’t got around to “flip one switch in the compiler and recompile for silicon.” That must be one heavy switch.I’d just like to conveniently note Apple’s self-proclaimed “two-year transition” is in its fourth calendar year, and likely to go into its fifth if Mac Pro won’t get M2.
Expect we won't see an M3 Ultra or an even bigger chip by the end of the year if we are only getting M2 Ultra in June...100% updated Studios with M2 Max and M2 Ultra, and the Mac Pro will be pre-announced with the M3, available late 2023.
Some Pros need an Intel Mac still. I need one just to use Docker to deploy to AWS Intel based instances. Virtualization doesn't work.