RJWP said:Here's an idea. Let's create a "Reader's Guide" similar to the Buyer's Guide. It would rate rumor sites.
Well, after the aluminium shortage blurb, MacRumors would get a solid -8 by me...
RJWP said:Here's an idea. Let's create a "Reader's Guide" similar to the Buyer's Guide. It would rate rumor sites.
liketom said:On apple home page you see the g5 taking the large ad and emac only has little one ,,WHY ??? more updates today thats what i think iMac then iBook
tom
Oirectine said:Holy cow. How did you know??
*throws a parade for Jimsowden*
stoid said:Perhaps you should consider different target consumers before you wildly bash Apple's product offerings.
Le Big Mac said:Wait, what's it first in? Having an 8x DVD-R? That's it. So the parts became available in time for this. Otherwise, none of the features are new. It's still the lowest end of the line, just not below other parts of the line.
Rest assured, the other models will be updated as well, almost for sure quite soon.
Besides, they probably want to get the emacs out for school orders this fall. don't they start buying at this time of year?
liketom said:On apple home page you see the g5 taking the large ad and emac only has little one ,,WHY ??? more updates today thats what i think iMac then iBook
tom
I guess you shouldn't take offense anyway. You have been reading and posting on these forums, so you should be (and I'm sure you are) perfectly aware that PBs (among others) are to be updated soon. When? I wouldn't know. But what can I say. You took a risk. Deal with it and chill. Maybe the PBs won't be updated for another 2 months (I sincerely hope not) and your investment will prove wise...a17inchFuture said:Yeah, thats just the thing, the cheapest, lowest line should not be first!!!!!!!!!! And as someone who bought a powerbook a week ago, i DO take personal offense, because its insulting that the update is imminent, but held off so their profit margins are greater. Emacs can only go up, and thats why their being updated. PB's, on the other hand, are doing well, cause people want apple and portable, and dont care about the price/details. So Steve screws people like me and anyone who has recently put their PB's in 6th overall, and highest among comps.
So you shut it, i am right.
Flyers486 said:The iMac is dead. At this point it would seem unwise for apple to try to premier a new iMac with specs comparable to the new powerbooks (the new G4s at 1.5). More likely this spells the end of the iMac (in its current form) as we know it and a new product debuting at WWDC. The cube G5, anyone?
Greg
a17inchFuture said:Thats just it. the demographice for the emac line is cheap so its cheap. Yet the Pb line demogrpahic is of a higher spending bracket, so despite the facts that there is VERY little difference between the machines, they charge more to the pro line users.
Its truly offensive to me.
That's awesome! I really need a new ipod for my video editing, music production and photoshop! I mean...my 7 month old 30 gig is starting to run out of CPU power (sarcasm intended).bar italia said:from Macintouch:
* Sure sounds like a new iPod ad campaign is on the way, doesn't it?
ultimind said:This makes for the best $1000 DVD Authoring station money can buy...if you throw in DVD Studio Pro and max out the RAM, you're still talking less than $2000 for professional grade DVD Authoring.
...
stoid said:Call it a hunch, but I think that Apple IS working on faster PowerBooks.
stoid said:Call it a hunch, but I think that Apple IS working on faster PowerBooks. However, working out new laptop technology has many more hurdles than desktop technology. I realize that the PowerBooks might be a bit underpowered and overpriced, but I'm not going to begrudge Apple releasing new models of one line as they continue to work on others. That kind of attitude sounds like a very young child who is jealous that their little sibling got a better birthday present or something. Grow up and understand that Apple doesn't control the laws of physics and is trying to make money by release new products as quickly and economically as possible.
RJWP said:Here's an idea. Let's create a "Reader's Guide" similar to the Buyer's Guide. It would rate rumor sites. All sites would start with a neutral rating, say a numeric value of 0. Accurate predictions earn them +1, false rumors earn them -1. When they get above, say, +10 they earn the designation "Trust Implicitly - Recently Accurate". When they fall below -10 they achieve "Don't Trust - Reality Soon".
So how do you guys think Appleinsider would rate? (I'd guess it's on its way to being EOL-ed.)