DOACleric said:Bah! I just bought an eMac a month ago. I know I shouldn't be complaining, but I can't help feel a bit jealous. Especially about the Radeon 9200 and DDR memory. Ahh well, my eMac is still faster anyway![]()
how do you have a 1.4 ghz emac?
DOACleric said:Bah! I just bought an eMac a month ago. I know I shouldn't be complaining, but I can't help feel a bit jealous. Especially about the Radeon 9200 and DDR memory. Ahh well, my eMac is still faster anyway![]()
AirUncleP said:When was the last time you saw an Apple computer advertised on TV?
mklos said:Doing what you said creates problems! What happens 8 months down the road when its time to update the eMac again and there aren't any faster G4 processors? Then what do you do? I guess one would answer put a G5 in it, but I think that will be a while. I'd expect the eMac to be the last computer to ever get a G5 processor. Apple did put the fastest bus possible in the eMac. The 167 MHz FSB is currently the fastest possible for the G4 processor. Apple needs a little room for improvement in the future. Maybe the G4 iMac was capable of doing 1.5 GHz a long time ago but why Apple didn't put it in it was because Apple needs a little room for later improvements. All computer companies are skimpy on RAM. 256MB is actually pretty good. At least now you can take it out of the box and actually use it unlike yesterday's eMac which came standard with 128 MB. The eMac is for schools, and very low end consumers. People like that don't need 1 GB of RAM to browse the internet, check e-mail, and use a word processor. The school I work in the computers only have 128 MBs of RAM and they all run Windoze XP Pro. Some even have 64 MB. So to ship a low end machine with 256 is actually a blessing to schools.
groovebuster said:... and it is still a hefty price for an old chip with yesterdays specs. For that kind of money you can get a PIV 3GHz with an 800MHz bus which is in the same league as the G5.
Or you can get a complete computer (including a 17" monitor & Windows XP) with a Celeron 2.4 GHz that still blows the G4 of the eMac out of the water...
agentmouthwash said:sure the powerbook is more money, but it's a portable masterpiece!
jayb2000 said:First, a Celeron will not blow the G4 away, especially on home use.
Second, a comparable Hell is more!
eMac 1.25GHz/256SD/40G/Combo/56K $799.00
eMac Tilt & Swivel Stand $59.00
APP for iMac/eMac - Enrollment Kit $169.00
iLife '04 $49.00
Subtotal
$1,076.00
I think DOACleric probably did one of those void-your-warranty-but-make-your-eMac-faster upgrades mentioned in another thread on Mac Rumors (I'm not about to search for it). I did read that thread, but I never thought an eMac could be upgraded past 1.33 GHz anyway (judging by what was in that thread). Therefore, I'm wondering too - just how did DOACleric get that eMac to go past 1.33 GHz to 1.4 GHz?a17inchFuture said:how do you have a 1.4 ghz emac?
a17inchFuture said:how do you have a 1.4 ghz emac?
a17inchFuture said:You are soo annoying. I don't want to trade in my comp, i dont want my money back.
i am expressing my opinion about the way apple does business, and of course i hav eno insider information, so who knows what the hold up is, could be nothing.
BUT, what we do know is the PB's are outdated (as evidenced by todays emac release) and yet the PB's are still full price.
When you acknowledge something like this emac 1.25 does, you have to relase incentive to buy the older, outdated product. And yet, they don't, even though there are mroe people wasting money on PB's than on any other comp.
This is evidence of a company that cares not about their customer.
stoid said:The 15 inch PowerBook is quite possibly the sexiest laptop ever!
a17inchFuture said:Yeah, thats just the thing, the cheapest, lowest line should not be first!!!!!!!!!! And as someone who bought a powerbook a week ago, i DO take personal offense, because its insulting that the update is imminent, but held off so their profit margins are greater. Emacs can only go up, and thats why their being updated. PB's, on the other hand, are doing well, cause people want apple and portable, and dont care about the price/details. So Steve screws people like me and anyone who has recently put their PB's in 6th overall, and highest among comps.
So you shut it, i am right.
PretendPCuser said:What kind of service were they in for? THat's a pretty vague statement. As someone who might be considering an eMac (as a recommendation for someone else) please be more specific about the problems you encountered? Were they hardware related? Software? Kids pounding on them?
Thanks for the feedback.
I suspected it was overclocked; I just didn't think the eMac in any form was capable of reaching 1.4 GHz safely (including the newest models released today).DOACleric said:Overclocked. The eMacs used the same exact processor found in the dual 1.4ghz Powermacs - only underclocked. Therefore, getting it up to 1.4ghz is as simple as a drop of solder. a $500 eMac 800mhz -> 1.4ghz eMac was quite a bargain!
Diatribe said:I say it's gonna be a
1,6GHz G5 in the iMac
2,5GHz G5 in the Powermac
1,25Ghz G4 in the iBooks
1,6 Ghz G4 or G5(although unlikely) in the powerbook
That's my prediction. All in the next 3-4 weeks.
Zaty said:My guess is no PMs until WWDC and 1.5 GHz G4 in PBs. The iMac will also be speed bumped to 1.5 GHz (G4).
I agree. Do you agree with Diatribe's prediction for iBooks?Zaty said:My guess is no PMs until WWDC and 1.5 GHz G4 in PBs. The iMac will also be speed bumped to 1.5 GHz (G4).
Diatribe said:I guess time will tell.![]()
wrldwzrd89 said:I agree. Do you agree with Diatribe's prediction for iBooks?