Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/3B48b Safari/419.3)
I figured they would go to something like this eventually. Does anyone know if it works with any song or just with stuff created with GarageBand?
Can someone more talented than me please get to it, take the master NiN tracks and mix up some uniquely awesome ringtones? Pretty please?
The average customer is probably on a Windows computer or have something other than the latest version of iLife '08 -- worst still (like me) hasn't downloaded the update -- or even worse, don't know that they could do this. This is truly no big deal until it gets into iTunes and becomes a known feature that Apple officially announces on their website and in the printed materials they pack in with their phones.GarageBand doesn't import MP3 files. Most people don't know how to get around that, which means that people can't use "their illegal music".
Also, it doesn't import iTunes protected AAC files, which means that if it's from the iTMS you have to pay still.
So... the average consumer can't make ringtones out of others' songs.
A thousand times yes. I remember the first time I considered taking the red or blue pill. I figured I didn't want to live a life fearful of every firmware update. As soon as the UK version of 1.1.2 hit, this functionality was exposed. Garageband is just letting us know Apple won't be taking the feature away again.
~ CB
Ahhh, thank you very much. And I wish you a Merry Christmas.If your phone will support MP3's, you can. Instead of choosing Send Ringtone to Itunes, choose Send song to Itunes. In the next box that comes up, choose MP3 encoder from the "compress using" list. Now comes getting it onto your phone. My phone has Bluetooth and I can use the Browse Device option on the Bluetooth menu on my Mac, using that I navigate to where my phone stores ringtones, hit send, then browse to my iTunes library and find the file I want. Oh, and I did find a way to use protected songs, but I'm not telling!!!![]()
so our windows friends will have to pay .99 cents while mac users get free ringtones on their iphone?? I smell lawsuit coming quickly, and Apple isn't going to win
GarageBand doesn't import MP3 files. Most people don't know how to get around that, which means that people can't use "their illegal music".
Also, it doesn't import iTunes protected AAC files, which means that if it's from the iTMS you have to pay still.
So... the average consumer can't make ringtones out of others' songs.
What can Windows user do?
Switch to Mac?
I just got a Mac for $1,300 last month capable of doing EVERYTHING I need as a design/illustration professional. 10 years ago, I bought a top of the line Mac for $5,000 (Quadra 840av). Mac Pros currently start at $2,500. While I have GarageBand for free, I know I can throw ringtones on my iPhone for free too. I honestly have NO idea what you're really complaining about, because... nothing lines up.This is the dumbest idea paying for ringtones just to make an extra buck, first of all Apple prices are skyrocket high to an extreme level of bullcrap where everyone has an opinion or two but its not on a positive note, maybe apple should realize just by making good hardware sense day one, yet to set a good price on their product. Sickening.
Anyways Just get a comp with bluetooth an a phone that has one enable so you can do your own with quicktime pro or garageband for free.
The new macpros will be 4,000 by the way.![]()
Oy... Windows users have NO problem using Audacity for ringtones. That's what I used. Mac users are free to tease Windows users for not having Garageband... but choosing a section of audio and saving it out isn't anything to toot over.Ha ha, I was waiting for this. I have been reading and reading waiting to see a Windows user whine. Well, wake up, Apple has been too cordial for long enough giving Windows users the exact same experience with the iPhone and iPod and iTunes as they do the Mac users. Apple should implement more Mac only features for their products, this would give people more compelling reasons to buy a Mac and actually use it as a "Mac".
And before anybody (especially Windows users call flame me) Mac users are burned year after year with Windows only features in MS Office, MS Messenger and virtually anything MS makes for the Mac.
Oy... Windows users have NO problem using Audacity for ringtones. That's what I used. Mac users are free to tease Windows users for not having Garageband... but choosing a section of audio and saving it out isn't anything to toot over.
~ CB
I just got a Mac for $1,300 last month capable of doing EVERYTHING I need as a design/illustration professional. 10 years ago, I bought a top of the line Mac for $5,000 (Quadra 840av). Mac Pros currently start at $2,500. While I have GarageBand for free, I know I can throw ringtones on my iPhone for free too. I honestly have NO idea what you're really complaining about, because... nothing lines up.
~ CB
But... iTunes is free... and you can add ringtones to your iPhone using iTunes for free. So... we're still in the same place I think. iTunes ALSO offers ringtones through the iTMS for $1.99, but you don't need to buy them unless you don't want to crop your sounds yourself.I was suggesting everyone do it the free way and forget the ringtone thing on itunes.
CBJammin103 said:You can't please all of the people all of the time. You'll want blood next I suppose.
Good lord. I don't think I'm asking for much, the latest iLife hasn't been out for very long yet and this is a relatively small change to the software that could most easily be implemented into older versions. Sheesh.
Pandaboots said:Welcome to Apple, Inc. They are a business. One of their many goals each day is to make a profit, which in turn leads to paying employees a salary in which to make a living. Allowing one to use old software and giving free updates doesn't turn a profit. Ok seriously, go out and spend $69.99 on Amazon for iLife '08. It's the biggest bargain of the century. And put down that $2 cup of Starbucks before you say you can't afford it.
Well, I was holding off on the iLife update... it's not that I absolutely can't afford it - not that I drink Starbucks anyway- but it's that I couldn't justify the $70 for what seems to be a marginal update at best, for me. I don't have a video camera so I wouldn't use the new iMovie and I don't see a $70 change in iPhoto. At least for a most casual photographer. And I definitely won't use iWeb, not much appeal in cookie-cutter website creation for me.
So it's not that I don't like iLife, it's that I didn't really need the upgrade and could have spent that money better. Like on Leopard...
Ah well, guess I'll have to give it a second thought at some point.