sacear said:The PowerBook will not go to a G5 CPU. Apple will not spend the R&D money to create two new form factors in less than two years. Do you know how expensive those PowerBooks would be?![]()
The new PowerPC 970MP chips will probably only get into the Xserve, the Power Mac, and maybe the iMac.
The PowerBook G4 will hopefully see another speed bump or two, yet the next new PowerBook form factor will be for the Intel CPU.![]()
Well, Apple squeezed a G3 into a PB 3400c chassis and that particular model "Kanga" was on the market for ONLY five months before the sleek WallStreet models debuted.
The way people are today, a Powerbook G5 in the current Aluminum form factor would do much better than a Powerbook G4 over the next year or so until it goes Intel, IMHO. If they can do it with minimal engineering and adjustments, they probably will. If they need an all-new form factor, I'm with you on that, though they _could_ go with the new form factor for the G5 and use it for the first generation of Intels. Kinda like what they did for the first generation of TiBooks - internally it was pretty much a Pismo with a G4.
In fact, come to think of it, Apple leverages their R&D pretty well. The G3 came out in the 3400c form factor, then they came out with the Wallstreet design and refined that over time. That refinement continued through the Pismo (slimming and trimming, adding stuff over time). The TiBook externals were the priority then they re-engineered the internals over time. When the AlBooks came out, the 12 incher was pretty much the same as the iBook internally, and somewhat the same externally. Most of the R&D was done on the 17 incher, and they didn't update the 15 incher for quite a while. I'm betting on more of the same. Either Apple goes with a new form factor and the G5 to grab sales and attention until the Intels come along, using the same form factor for at least one generation of the Intels. OR they keep the same AlBook form factor and squeeze the G5 inside, keeping sales healthy until the Intels debut. R&D is expensive, and they want to make sure it pays off as long as possible. Why do you think Apple stuck with the same El Capitan tower design for so long?