Enable selective sync and I will gladly subscribe. Otherwise, I am not interested in using up needless hard drive space, because Apple thinks I should have all my files on every Apple device.
If you like google mining your dataI moved all my photos and movies over to Google Photos, which is unlimited and free forever. I'm not going to pay Apple monthly for the same thing.
Not exactly the same. Google Photos store up to 16MP for free, but the image quality is compressed. On iCloud you can store RAW photos. I know most people don't see the difference and don't care about RAW, but for some people this is important.
Except that they don't sell your info. Do you not know how data mining works? Google sells ads, not personal info. They get paid to display an ad to the correct audience. At no point does one of their users info get sold to anyone else. If Google were to provide their info, why would the company paying for the ad have to go through Google?Just speculating here, but it's probably cheaper from Google because they data mine and sell your info.
Google isn't offering what Apple is offering. Apple is offering a safe and secured place for your photos. And the convenience of them being synced across all your Apple devices. iCloud preserves the quality, date, and location of your photos. Google doesn't do a good job of any of that stuff. And Google uses your photos for advertising purposes. In my opinion, iCloud is definitely worth the 99¢ each month.If Google can offer a lot more for much less, why can't Apple too?? They have money and resources. Come on.
I moved all my photos and movies over to Google Photos, which is unlimited and free forever. I'm not going to pay Apple monthly for the same thing.
Google Photos free unlimited may sound like a good deal, but even if your photo is less than 16MP, Google still recompress it (significantly), reducing its quality. Not cool in my book.I moved all my photos and movies over to Google Photos, which is unlimited and free forever. I'm not going to pay Apple monthly for the same thing.
Seriously , you trust google? You know Google make a lot more money for storing your photos free by selling your info to anyone who pays them.I moved all my photos and movies over to Google Photos, which is unlimited and free forever. I'm not going to pay Apple monthly for the same thing.
I moved all my photos and movies over to Google Photos, which is unlimited and free forever. I'm not going to pay Apple monthly for the same thing.
You have to adjust your iCloud Photo settings to avoid the compression.You're not paying for the same thing. Google photos downsizes your photos and compresses them unless you're paying google for their storage.
iCloud doesn't do that. It retains the exact image and File size of the original photo
And you do know that your photos are not saved full size - so that in fact they're not backed up at all - and that Google can make use of your photos whenever they want for free… you get what you pay for!
Because here on earth a company like Apple can make it happen. Just adjust a little their cost scheme and there you have it. Absurd is keeping the old model of paying extra for everything you need to use the Apple devices. This will give apple customers another reason to stay with Apple. Investing Millions is close to nothing with all that cash they have and will bring them more billions with free advertising from all news and media covering the FREE cloud services and billions of $ in repeat customers as wells as people leaving MS and Google to get all the storage they need in the cloud when they buy an Apple device, one less thing to worry about.That's absurd and would cost apple millions. iCloud backup is an OPTIONAL feature, the most data heavy feature is photos and it makes sense to charge each user just for what they actually NEED instead of giving them 3TB here and 128GB there. Why on earth would they match your device size for every device?? Keep your head in the clouds!
They can do it without jacking up the prices, storage costs go down over time. They have the funds and they can simply adjust their cost scheme to this be a magnet to repeat purchases as well as attracting new customers from MS and Google.I disagree. Charging more upfront means EVERYONE pays for the service, whether they want it or not. Though the monthly fee may seem like "nickel and diming to death", at least it is an option for those who wish to purchase it can do so.
Which is lame considering how Google only offers 15GB free. There's no reason for Google to be able to offer better. Flickr offers free 1TB storage, and no recompressing crap. I expect Google, being the giant top internet company, to do better.If you go to your Google photos settings: https://photos.google.com/settings
and change your selection to "Original", your photos are saved unmodified. The only downside to this is that they count against your account storage total. Whereas the "High Quality" setting has unlimited storage.
iCloud server would be greatI wish Apple would offer an iCloud server as part of the OS X Server package. I would pay for that, I would pay a lot for that.
I like the idea of iCloud, connecting my iPhone to a cloud and having all the photos and documents synched. But I don't want to trust Apple or anyone else to host it for me. I want to host it myself.
I'm sure other corporations would also love that control. Implementing their own iCloud for syncing documents across users, while maintaining complete control of privacy and security.
OS X server lets you host your own calendar server, mail server, file server, update server, web server, etc. iCloud server would use be a nice addition.
Unlimited and free forever? Doesn't that sound just a little bit dubious to you? How the hell are they trying to make money from this?I moved all my photos and movies over to Google Photos, which is unlimited and free forever. I'm not going to pay Apple monthly for the same thing.