No, I don’t think so. The Mac Pro is probably a last gasp of effort at serving power users... despite it never being financially available to power users ever again, let alone basic end users who don’t need much to begin with.anyone else think there was a breakdown in communication somewhere and that the iMac will be taking its cues from the Mac Pro & Pro Display?
AMD Navi 2 looks likely for graphics. I have heard a few good things about it But not a lot of detail. What do people think of Navi2?
(And no, Nvidia is not happening, so please no complaints about that.)
No, I don’t think so. The Mac Pro is probably a last gasp of effort at serving power users... despite it never being financially available to power users ever again, let alone basic end users who don’t need much to begin with.
The iMac is their basic computer that isn’t a laptop. It’s marketed as a do it all computer, and only a few people know any better (and honestly, if you don’t need to run at 100% CPU & GPU for hours at a time, it doesn’t matter... but some of us do and most Apple fanatics like to pretend we are liars or should be able to afford a $15K computer purchase if we are “real” professionals).
Maybe the iMac Pro will get an update someday, but that will probably just mean it too will be twice as expensive as the last model... but maybe it’ll look more like the Mac Plutocrat display.
I was lucky with my 2015 5k 27" (Apple Certified refurb, purchased in early 2016). It crashed within the first 8 months, and Apple replaced the logic board. No problems since.Funny you should say that, my late 2015 27" crashed last week as well. Let me know how you make out.
I have the exact same machine, pretty much. Last week was the second time I erased the hard drive and installed Mac OS and started over. I was getting constant crashes/reboots over a period of two days. Since then it's been working great. It's my daily driver since working from home for nearly 3 months now.I was lucky with my 2015 5k 27" (Apple Certified refurb, purchased in early 2016). It crashed within the first 8 months, and Apple replaced the logic board. No problems since.
Even with this news, I'm still planning on replacing the Fusion Drive with an SSD. That should hold me until late 2021, or whenever Apple releases a revised edition of this new iMac.
I was also a little timid about doing this "surgery" after watching those videos. But then, my younger brother (who has a hardware repair side-business) told me that it was really "easy", and that he's done it several times.I have the exact same machine, pretty much. Last week was the second time I erased the hard drive and installed Mac OS and started over. I was getting constant crashes/reboots over a period of two days. Since then it's been working great. It's my daily driver since working from home for nearly 3 months now.
The ssd's are replaceable on these? I've seen videos but have to muster the courage!
Let me know how it goes and best of luck!I was also a little timid about doing this "surgery" after watching those videos. But then, my younger brother (who has a hardware repair side-business) told me that it was really "easy", and that he's done it several times.
Still, I think I'll wait until he's in town to assist me.
Thank you @Azrael9. Very helpful.
So my hypothesis of new iMac graphics performance would therefore be:
For me this raises some questions about graphics :
- lower end iMac / lower end Navi gpu options: big advance at the price point and performance near to high end amd gpus of this generation - I.e. similar progress to that attained in the last iMac 27” refresh
- higher end iMac / gpu options: highly competitive performance that is at least comparable with higher end Nvidia for video editing / FX. Maybe not for gaming, but who knows.
Also, is graphics power the reason why intel iMacs stick around for a while - because Apple’s arm-related graphics processors are fantastic up to iPad scale, but can’t replicate the synergy of intel processor and amd graphics until a couple of years work has been done? This is one of the many interesting questions about the arm transition....
- if there’s a 32” screen how much gpu performance will be soaked up by driving g the screen, and how much will be left for applications to use?
Especially if you’re also driving an external 4K screen? (Fairly common use case for video editors and definitively something I’d want to do.) I guess the fact the 13” MBP can drive a XDR screen with the intel 10G processor integrated graphics is probably a positive indicator for this.- will thermals be upgraded enough to let these machines get the most from their silicon?
will the iMac Pro be competitive? Can this graphics power come in a package below the $5k level? Does the iMac Pro get the 32” screen and top end Navi at $5k?- will entry level iMacs just come with Intel 10g graphics and 24” screens? If so that’s a pretty compelling product...
Ahh here we go! Time for iMac lovers to feast. Now I just have to figure out what to do with my 2019 27”..... Maybe I’ll hold onto it until next year.
Hooefully they will improve the thermals on the new iMac, like they did on the iMac Pro’s.I'm not that excited about another Intel Mac cause their CPU sucks... 10th gen desktop CPU isn't that better than 9th gen and yet it is much hotter. I have no idea what they are thinking.
It’s good, but the base is still the old style. The new iMacs won’t have the old base.That mockup looks beautiful!
Don't let us down Apple.
It may well be.
That Navi gpu will make my 680MX seem prehistoric.
Promotion refresh rate? Yes please!
Azrael.
It appeared on my 2017 about a month ago. both bottom corners.FFS. I didn’t know that was an issue again.
I'm a byer if it gets Apple Pencil support and a stand to put it nearly flat. An extra display with a same size and design would be nice too. Otherwise I will consider going Hackingtosh now to replace my Mac mini 2012.
Cool, but why waste a redesign with the old Intel processor, especially when you are revealing the transition to a whole new architecture (ARM)? Doesn't make any sense.
You can get started on that hackintosh. Apple doesn’t do touch displays for MacOS devices.
You can get started on that hackintosh. Apple doesn’t do touch displays for MacOS devices.
It's not the point. Neither has a Mac mini. I would buy a new mini if it had a better GPU, therefore I also have an eye on hackintosh as a Mac Pro is way to expensive.
I am not the typical customer for an iMac as I move quite a lot with my gear to places where I already have monitors.
But as a Photographer an iMac with pencil support would make me buy it.
Well, they don't do them until they start doing them.
The competition (windows) mostly now offers touch screens as soon as you go to a 4k-class display, so it is becoming a tick-list feature that makes Apple look bad on spec sheets. Then there's iOS development (you can't really test a touch interface without a touchscreen).
...also, ARM-based Macs could easily offer the ability to run iOS/iPadOS apps if the machine had a touchscreen.
Frankly, Apple are really lucky that Microsoft seem lukewarm about promoting things like the Surface Studio (...a gorgeous concept messed up by outdated specs and ridiculous prices that make iMacs look like bleeding-edge bargains)
There's a whole bunch of things that Apple have said that they would never do, and then did.You can get started on that hackintosh. Apple doesn’t do touch displays for MacOS devices.