You can always purchase a $299 iPouch with iCePacks (up to 4 x $50/each) to hang on the back of your iMac.thicker for improved cooling ?
You can always purchase a $299 iPouch with iCePacks (up to 4 x $50/each) to hang on the back of your iMac.thicker for improved cooling ?
LG 32UD99-WWhat brand and model of the 32" are you using?
Would be a bit daft to have Intel chips if they also announce a transition to ARM at the same event as could put a number of buyers off. Based on prevous Apple CPU/architecture tansitions they haven't supported the old architecture for that long. Then again if the apps you need don't run on ARM or are slow to transition, then you might be quite happy. Doesn't make the decision to upgrade an easy one.Long overdue! Do we think they will have Intel of Apple chips?
They took a brilliant idea and pushed it too far. The first generations seemed well balanced, but then they made the SSDs too small. I suspect it’s because most users only need less than a TB of storage so the math of the fusion drive starts to break down. In my case, I have several TB of storage that I obviously don’t need all at once, so a good 256GB or 512GB SSD fused with rotating media would work well for me if they made such a thing.It's about time. I was bullish on the Fusion Drive when I first got my iMac 5K. In theory it's the best of both worlds and the performance is massively better than an HDD and a lot cheaper than an SSD of the same size.
What they don't tell you, though, is that the SSD part of the Fusion Drive gets absolutely hammered with wear as you use it.
Data is constantly being migrated onto and off of it as you work. (That's by design -- after all, the logic is that the stuff you're actively working on is moved to the SSD). But all that throughput, with the tiny SSDs Apple provides in these systems, destroys them with wear. After about 4 years, the 128GB SSD in my Fusion Drive was showing less than 10% of its lifetime left before I opened the thing up and installed a big SATA SSD. So, as far as I'm concerned, Fusion Drives are basically a ticking time bomb. Also remember, some of the SSDs in Fusion Drives are a measly 32GB, exposing them to even worse wear rates than mine.
with a 4K front facing camera ?
What if the iMac redesign costs $1999 with a 512GB SSD and 32” 6K display? But then comes without a stand which costs $999!!! Don’t rule anything out...This could be the most gorgeous iMac ever!
What if the stand moves to a flat surface and runs iOS and supports Apple Pencil?
Nope. I'm sticking with my 256 SSD for the low cost base model.Try 512gb minimum. Amazon has 512gb SSDs for $50. Sure they're not Apple spec'd, but I'm not trying to buy 10,000 at once either.
Add me to the list of mid-2011 owners hoping to upgrade soon. i installed an SSD in mine 4 years ago and it is still pretty good except no MacOs upgrades.I'm on the mid-2011 also. Has lasted forever, but I'm all on a new iMac if released at WWDC. It will be nice to get on a computer that supports Metal and can run the latest OS again. Hoping the screen size goes to 32 inches and that SSD prices are reasonable—I'll get at least 1TB regardless.
What brand and model of the 32" are you using?
This could be the most gorgeous iMac ever!
What if the stand moves to a flat surface and runs iOS and supports Apple Pencil?
If you get a good price, it's not a terrible idea. If it was me I'd just try the FD out and see if it meets your needs, then do the surgery later on when it's out of AppleCare anyway. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's not a fun process (lots of glue strips) but it's doable. There's a big thread somewhere on these forums about replacing the blade SSDs, which you have to carefully match to your system. The SATA drive is generic and a piece of cake to source and replace, but a bit slower.