Where's the ad about the person trying to use normal headphones and being angered as they don't want to use a ****** low quality adapter?
Do the ads showcase how there are no iPhone 7's to buy?
What a waste of money on Apple's part if they are actually buying ad time on television right now.
Their target audience isn't that tiny group of people angry at the world, but rather the 200 million people worldwide, let that sink in, who will be excited to buy it over the next 12 months.Where's the ad about the person trying to use normal headphones and being angered as they don't want to use a ****** low quality adapter?
Do the ads showcase how there are no iPhone 7's to buy?
What a waste of money on Apple's part if they are actually buying ad time on television right now.
Tiny group puhlease. Can't wait for apples disappointing sales numbers of this new phone. Funny you think you think people are angry at the world for disliking the removal of a port that works and has no better solutions. You apple apologists are full of excuses.You don't know how advertising works if you don't think all the ads they ran on the NFL games today stoked demand that will last until people get their hands on one
[doublepost=1474261023][/doublepost]
Their target audience isn't that tiny group of people angry at the world, but rather the 200 million people worldwide, let that sink in, who will be excited to buy it over the next 12 months.
I think it is disappointing photos taken by real users look nothing like the photos Schiller showed during the presentation.
Hoping Apple doesn't "Void" warranties for people mimicking their ads with their current 7 model though!
Tiny group puhlease. Can't wait for apples disappointing sales numbers of this new phone. Funny you think you think people are angry at the world for disliking the removal of a port that works and has no better solutions. You apple apologists are full of excuses.
Your post is true after seeing this video...Low light "magic" camera is a lie, based on pictures posted online it's even worse than a camera of iPhone 6s; advertising water resistance when water damage isn't covered is irresponsible; suggesting to ride a bike under a lightning is just crazy and irresponsible as well. Not to mention an added danger of a working mobile phone at that moment.
Apple Store: "Sir? Your iPhone is damaged by water. It's $349 plus tax to replace the phone."
Costumer: "But in your ad you were showcasing the water proof ability"
Apple Store: "That was just an ad sir,you shouldn't trust the ads.It's $349 plus tax to replace the phone."
There fixed for you.
Here's a more extensive comparison:
http://www.cnet.com/special-reports...vs-galaxy-s7-vs-iphone-6s-plus/#7-vs-galaxyS7
The iPhone 7 looks like it holds up pretty well in this shootout. It looks like a lot of the differences may come down to preferences in software post processing. A lot of the Galaxy shots look like they were sharpened more aggressively, which isn't a positive to me. I like to have the option of sharpening on my own if I want to do it.
Your post is true after seeing this video...
Where is the ad from Samsung that its ISOCELL has beaten the iPhone cameras again this year?
I watched the Android Authority comparison between the Note7 and V20. I'm still getting V20 since still photos aren't the end-all, be-all for me. The video recording and unique audio features is important but no way was I agreeing with Lanh Nguyen that V20 was showing better still photos than Note7. Even I am not that biased.
But as the video above has proven, uh yeah, 7+ is losing to the Note7. The dislikes probably came from 600+ ticked off 7+ users. I really prefer if there was a wider angle on the 7+ front cam so we don't need anymore selfie sticks. So go ridicule the Note7 all you want. That exploding phone is beating 7 Plus' low light magic in several shots.
So Apple, low light magic my azz. Liars again by using "magic", taking out a 3.5mm headphone jack for more water-resistance without water damage while other water-resist phones still kept it, 25% brighter display when it is dim and still stuck at 750p/1080p, and sapphire crystal camera lens is all a bunch of crock!
Ads are just that.. BS-ing. Like the boy who cried wolf.
I've been trying out my new iPhone 7 in lighting situations that my 5s couldn't quite handle and it's doing considerably better well in those situations, but I'm still not blown away. It's probably because I'm used to what a true camera can do in low light. It's not a fair comparison, given that a DSLR style camera has one purpose and one purpose only.
I give it the iPhone 7 an OK in the better camera dept. It doesn't live up to the claims of being magical. Pretty good, but still nothing that's going to make me feel like I don't need to haul a DSLR when I want to be sure I get a good photo.
Tiny group puhlease. Can't wait for apples disappointing sales numbers of this new phone. Funny you think you think people are angry at the world for disliking the removal of a port that works and has no better solutions. You apple apologists are full of excuses.
Your post is true after seeing this video...
Where is the ad from Samsung that its ISOCELL has beaten the iPhone cameras again this year?
I watched the Android Authority comparison between the Note7 and V20. I'm still getting V20 since still photos aren't the end-all, be-all for me. The video recording and unique audio features is important but no way was I agreeing with Lanh Nguyen that V20 was showing better still photos than Note7. Even I am not that biased.
But as the video above has proven, uh yeah, 7+ is losing to the Note7. The dislikes probably came from 600+ ticked off 7+ users. I really prefer if there was a wider angle on the 7+ front cam so we don't need anymore selfie sticks. So go ridicule the Note7 all you want. That exploding phone is beating 7 Plus' low light magic in several shots.
So Apple, low light magic my azz. Liars again by using "magic", taking out a 3.5mm headphone jack for more water-resistance without water damage while other water-resist phones still kept it, 25% brighter display when it is dim and still stuck at 750p/1080p, and sapphire crystal camera lens is all a bunch of crock!
Ads are just that.. BS-ing. Like the boy who cried wolf.
Water resistant but not covered for water damage?! Makes perfect sense
Why you think they will believe you if you say "i used it like in the ads".If you use it like in the ad, this won't happen, so you just described you twisted little fantasy there... Great straw-man construction, impeccable.
ACDC in an Apple ad? Cool.
The first ad makes me want to call the police
do you know which bike mount he's using?great ads IMO. Surprised they are touting the water resistance so much given that it is not covered under warranty. Must be pretty confident. (Apple is already known to purposely understate water resistance capability)
edit: ps. putting a lot of trust in that bike mount. that dude is NUTS for not having a case on that thing.
As an avid cyclist I have to say the changes to the iPhone 7 in terms of water and dust resistance will have little if any effect. Nearly every rider I know has invested in a cycle computer preferring to keep their phone in a jersey pocket or (more rarely) in a seat bag. Most road cyclists I've spoken with would say the #1 reason for having a phone is to have in case of an emergency. The last thing you want in an emergency situation is a iPhone whose battery is nearly dead because you've been using it with a cycling app. Personally, I use a Garmin 1000 (which has saved my bacon a half dozen times when I use it in conjunction with the Varia rear radar system) and keep my iPhone 6S safely stashed in my jersey pocket.
You're so right! Lets have every company in the world advertise a product in a certain way, but not cover it under warranty when that feature is used! Sounds like a great idea genius! Apple sure is lucky to have a loyal customer like you defending them.One last try: Apple has no way to know if you damaged your phone by using it beyond its rated 1 meter depth for 30 mins. Neither they, or the rest of us who would be stuck with higher Apple Care costs, want to pay for people who take the risk of doing extreme things with their phone. Under your theory, Apple would have to replace all the phones in the YouTube videos where people do things like drop them into a lake from a helicopter. Heck, everyone could get a new phone whenever they wanted one simply by immersing their phone deep enough or long enough. Independent testing has certified it for the intended benefit of use in the rain or accidental fall into the water and other "testing" has shown it can withstand much more than that. Don't be a Don Quixote.
I've been riding for a few years now regularly, I have logged about 3400 miles using Runtastic Road Bike and now Strava Apps as my tracker. I don't think I have ever considered buying a cycling computer, but I know I'm in the minority. I do also have friends in other states that ride more than me, and they also use Strava