I don't remember saying they were stagnant.
You did a couple posts above that one
😛
All I'm saying is the resources that would normally have resulted in a NEW MBP or iMac have been moved and caused this situation of no new innovation...but most definately much improvement....to the computer products.
By no new innovation you mean no new
appearance, right? You're not referring to the internals?
The internals of the MacBook Pro are as advanced as could be had for the price. And a new iMac will of course be coming.
The iPhone runs OS X and took some people off of the main Leopard project to the tune of a mere 4 months (not the 4 years you're talking about). But the iPhone did not make it impossible to come up with new appearances for hardware.
One VERY good reason why the first Intel machines look similar to the last PPC machines is that this comforts the skeptical through a "scary" CPU transition.
Meanwhile, the iBook/MacBook WAS totally redesigned during your period of "no" new innovation. As was Airport and a bunch of iPods. Meanwhile the MacBook Pro, iMac, and Mac Pro got major redesigns as well (not to mention a new size of iMac). While looking similar on the outside, they are totally different inside. (The outer dimensions of the MacBook Pro aren't even the same as the first Al PowerBooks.) And I suspect pro buyers often care more about functionality improvements than changing the style just for style's sake.
And all this time, during the iPhone project, new Macs HAVE been designed. Even new appearances. That doesn't happen instantly, so as we see the fruits of those projects in the year ahead, you'll know the iPhone did not prevent them. One, I hope, will be a subnotebook
🙂
And Apple's software and OS innovation continues as well--at full speed ahead. The iPhone is actually a PART of that. Leopard for Macs is another, as we will see soon enough.