FSMBP
macrumors 68030
A camera is so NOT an incentive at all for me to consider an iPhone over a Touch. Not at all... i don't get that argument.
The basis for that decision - for me is:
1. do i want the monthly BILL that comes with a phone? How long term stable is my income level. 2 years ago when i got my current smartphone i never thought i'd be where i am today in that area. Locking into a high price for 2 years is a scary thought.
2. what carrier is it on? In my case AT&T would be a bad choice since everyone i call is on Verizon.
But it's NEVER been, hey, i'm getting the iPhone over the Touch because it has a camera. Of course, i rarely use the camera on my phone now...
Don't get me wrong, i'd love to see a camera added, but in today's economy Apple wants units sold, so there can be Apps bought. The addition of the camera might help increase Touch sales, and allow some people to not break their budgets by entering a contract for 2 years.
I hope it's true - i just wish it wasn't a September thing.
Exactly. The iPod touch and the iPhone are two different beasts. One is a phone (it's key feature) and one is a media player.
I knew that once the steam from the iPod touch runs out that Apple will add a camera. Imagine, a Photo Booth type app; kids would love taking pictures and add effects (in fact, I know I have spent hours messing with my iSight and effects and I'm 22).
Although, I don't think feel like Apple will add a camera next update; it would make more sense maybe in 2 updates from now.