Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Banglazed

macrumors 603
Original poster
Apr 17, 2017
5,020
9,559
Cupertino, CA

Attachments

  • 8.PNG
    8.PNG
    30.9 KB · Views: 412
  • 8Plus.PNG
    8Plus.PNG
    31.6 KB · Views: 282
  • X.PNG
    X.PNG
    31.3 KB · Views: 368
Last edited:
These benchmarks are crazy.

The A9 is still perfectly fast and flies on iOS 11 and gets about 2500 single core , 4400 multi. More than enough for the use of a phone.

I'm sure X owners will be fine with their phones performance
 
Now that I think about it, it could be because of FaceID constantly running in the background that diverts some of the processing power. Even still, that shows how little processing consumption is taken up by the FaceID. iPhone X is still king.
 
Now that I think about it, it could be because of FaceID constantly running in the background that diverts some of the processing power. Even still, that shows how little processing consumption is taken up by the FaceID. iPhone X is still king.

Way less pixels to push on the 8 also.
 
Now that I think about it, it could be because of FaceID constantly running in the background that diverts some of the processing power. Even still, that shows how little processing consumption is taken up by the FaceID. iPhone X is still king.

No it’s because smaller screen. Fewer pixels to push around, lower resolution with same processor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesrick80
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.