I am one of those people who feel strongly about Apple keeping at least one phone with a headphone jack.
The low cost model is fine with me. Because it is the lowest cost model why take out the jack?
If Apple is trying to make it more affordable to more people why increase the cost by getting rid of the jack? Having to buy more expensive headphones like Apple's wireless ones. Other wireless headphones from what I read don't sound as good as wired.
Apple includes lightning headphones in the box. That's the lowest cost option for someone.
Apple's headphones don't stay in my ears and they hurt my ears.
The dongle is an unnecessary inconvenience. They get lost and I would need multiples and having to carry it all the time is just dumb.
I agree, that is dumb. You should keep the adapter plugged into your headphones, then you won't lose it. That said, replacement adapters are relatively affordable at $10.
My 15 year old truck uses the headphone jack to play my music off my phone to its cassette deck.
You should get something like this and leave it hooked up in your truck, even if you have a headphone jack:
https://www.scosche.com/iphone-7-car-charger or
https://www.scosche.com/iphone-7-headphone-adapter
Plugging one cable into your phone for both charging and audio is better than plugging in two.
I work in a school and connect my phone to multiple speaker systems throughout the school for various reasons. In the library, in the cafeteria, in the meeting rooms, etc. are a few places audio is played. The jack is a must to have when working in such environments. Old equipment has the 3.5mm jack. Too many people are too narrowly focused to see the big picture when it comes to use cases and convenience when it comes to keeping the ubiquitous little jack.
Honestly, that's not the most common use case. Having a port would be beneficial to you, but you're making mountains out of molehills. If you can carry around headphones, you can carry around headphones with the adapter as per my second point. Then you'd always have the adapter needed to plug in.
Are Apple's engineers less capable then Samsungs? That must be the case for the excuse of waterproofing to be used. Samsung didn't need to get rid of the jack to waterproof.
Looks like Apple needs to find some better engineers or stop using that lame excuse.
Apple's never used that "excuse." People have said that on forums though. You obviously can waterproof a headphone port, but generally the fewer points of potential ingress, the better, especially over the lifespan of the device (seals degrade). More importantly, going from the 6s to the 7, Apple added a better taptic engine and increased battery capacity: things that compete for space with the jack (yes I'm aware that one modder hacked the port back in).
The Apple defenders will say it is old tech and it's time for a change.
There are lots of things that stand the test of time for good reason.
The headphone jack is one of those things.
I agree that the headphone jack has value, but personally, I was already on the bluetooth train before Apple dumped the jack, and I like the push towards better bluetooth headphones that I'm seeing now (and AirPods are fantastic). Bluetooth had been stagnant for years, but with the iPhone and others dropping the headphone jack, companies (not just Apple) are actually trying to innovate in that area for once, which makes things better for me. Apple is at its best when it's looking forward, not backwards.
Sidenote: Before the iPhone, the cellular audio situation was a complete mess. Apple actually helped the 3.5mm port become a standard feature on phones. Many were the crappy 2.5mm variant or proprietary. It's quite Apple-like to help kill a movement they helped birth imo.