Evangelion said:true, but Amiga had dedicated chips for video, sound and other things. While the ST had MARGINALLY faster CPU, Amiga's had dedicated co-processors for several tasks. You could say that ST relied on brute force, whereas Amiga relied on elegance. But then again, even on the "brute force"-department, ST was only marginally faster than Amiga was (8MHz vs. 7.16MHz).
And the ST had dedicated chips too. It wasn't like an x86 POS back in the day. It had a separate graphics chip, a separate MMU, a sound chip, and also gained a Blitter with the STe line. You forget that the ST was created by many of the same engineers who created the Commodore64, while the Amiga was created by the same guy responsible for the Atari 400/800's custom chips. Strange twist of fate. Point is, both teams were very strong in the custom chip design department. I wish(ed) Atari would've simply slapped the AMY sound chip into the ST line standard, but once the Tramiels took over, the people who designed the chip were fired and apparently nobody from the Tramiel team could figure out how it worked. Throwing in the 7800's Maria chip would've also been interesting.
What both lines failed to do was making the 68881 math coprocessor standard fare. That would've helped out immensely. Same goes for the Mac, but then again, Apple would've raised the price of each machine by $300 with the inclusion of that.