I find it hard to understand why so many cheap people are coming to a site dedicated to Apple.
Now you understand why so many of them complain about $200 per step for upgrading RAM or SSD.
I find it hard to understand why so many cheap people are coming to a site dedicated to Apple.
If I was actually rich I would have invested in buying and collecting all the actual vinyl LPs, a decent player + acoustics and room treating instead of some wacky catalogue from Apple inc. with some absolutely tone deaf music tier. I mean, book doesn’t even offer those albums as a “free” addition to the book, QR codes would have been handy as well
Yup. Some of those books can be in the tens of thousands.Exactly, this is actually pretty cheap in hindsight.
There's really no other way to say this, so I will just say it...if $450 isn't considered cheap for a book like this, you're not wealthy by any standard, let alone "most". In the realm of books like this, $450 is nothing.I’m wealthy by most standards and I don’t consider this cheap by any means of hindsight. It’s idiotic.
There's really no other way to say this, so I will just say it...if $450 isn't considered cheap for a book, you're not wealthy by any standard, let alone "most". In the realm of books, $450 is nothing.
I'm not sure what you mean by your first sentence. The OP said they are wealthy by most standards and they don't consider $450 to be cheap for a book like this. I'm not a collector of books like the one in the article, yet I still think $450 is reasonable for this book, given the low number of copies and its Apple-related theme. In fact, I bought a copy of this Apple Music book just to sit on top of my G5 tower, where my router sits, for two reasons: One, it will look nice there, and two, I know most people won't have it.But wealthy people don't just exist in the realm of books. It's simply a matter of what people choose to spend money on. I have hobbies where I spend money that even a wealthy person might consider frivolous and shake their head at.
I'm not sure what you mean by your first sentence.
It's not.If only the list wasn’t garbage
Understood. But, a person doesn't have to be wealthy to think spending any amount of money on anything is idiotic. My point is, if a person claims they are wealthy, but they think spending $450 on a book like this is expensive (opposite of cheap), they are not wealthy.I mean that there are plenty of people that would willingly spend $450 on a book that they desired, but that's not necessarily tied to wealth. I'm sure there are lots of wealthy folks that have no interest in books, and might consider such a purchase to be idiotic, even if they see the dollar value as trivial.
That list was… made by children.If only the list wasn’t garbage
While I disagree with you, saying 20% is an acceptable margin of error for the 100 best albums of all time?It's not.
At least 20% is definitely worthy of the list, and many others are new to me / I don't have mental capacity to start discovering, so maybe actually more, who knows.
No matter what you listen to, you are hearing inspirations from albums such as Untrue, Songs in the Key of Life, The Downward Spiral, and many others from the list as well. These are absolutely worthy of top 100.
I wish there'd be more "underground" electronic music tho. Goldie maybe? Noisia — Split the Atom? C&K — Zeitgeist? Well...
Which makes it even more precise then?That list was… made by children.
What do you listen to? Calling daft punk garbage?If only the list wasn’t garbage
Agreed. My first thought seeing this was "this feels like something they could have pulled off around 2008 or so when everything coming out by them was unique and iTunes and iPods were cultural phenomenons and macs were at the tail end of being underdogs with some mystique around them to people who didn't use them. That was a time when the weird Apple fanatacism made some sense. They aren't that company anymore, even if they are a more sucessful one.As Apple Music is barely a thing, and most likely won't ever become one, that simply won't happen.
iTunes was a thing, a hugely popular and beloved cultural "institution" that, to a large extent, managed to bridge the gap between the analogue ways of buying music and the convenience of illegally pirating music.
Apple should have done this kind of book while iTunes was still the coolest way to buy and listen to music, and iTunes releases and charts had the World buzzing.
At the of iTunes popularity, Apple could have done this kind self-congratulatory book and easily sold it for $999.
Agree. They need to sell MORE stuff like this. Soak the rich, give the rest of us a break on RAM and SSD upgradesDon’t get the hate. It’s not even that expensive in terms of luxury book precedent that was set many, many moons ago.
Sure, many folk myself included were totally dumbfounded by the top 100 list. However, the concept and delivery of the book itself is not at all out of the ordinary, or even remotely strange.
In fact it’s entirely what I’d expect from Apple in this area. But yeah, not for me.
My daily playlist can go from UB40 — Rat in the Kitchen to Noisia — Shitbox to Infant Annihilator — Childchewer in a span of few hours.While I disagree with you, saying 20% is an acceptable margin of error for the 100 best albums of all time?
I'm glad you found some new music you haven't heard, that wasn't the point of the book.
I stopped looking at the list the minute I saw "Lemonade" higher than any album Bob Dylan put out. And Prince's Purple Rain when Sign of the Times is so much better.
Just retitle it, 100 best albums compiled by 20 year old Apple Music subscribers and I would be ok with it.
Anyone else completely forget about Apple Music 1 “radio”?Apple Music 1 radio host Zane Lowe