New M3 MacBook Pro and iMac Models Now Available for Purchase

Pretty gnarly price hikes on the 16 at the higher end configs, since they force you to get more than 36GB ram if you want the Maxest Max
 
If you bought a M2 MacBook Pro 9 months ago, I wouldn't feel too bad, but if you bought one after June, I would feel kinda scammed.
Got an M2 Max 16" last month o_O
But, at least if I had waited, well it would be more money for the M3 equivalent. I'm missing Ray Tracing, and the AV1 decode. Which would get used A LOT for me anyway. AHHHHHHH APPLE!!! Couldn't wait one more year!?! :p
Progress.
I wasn't expecting a new(er) MacBook Pro this year, and my older intel i7 MBP 16" was OLD and HOT.
 
I don't really understand the purpose of the M3 chip. Who needs more speed. I have an M1 Max, and it is plenty fast. In two more years will anyone need the newest chip. What will the desktop versions be like? They will probably be able to power 16 monitors independently. You'll need one Mac computer for an entire office of people doing normal business work.
 
It did not replace 14" M2 Pro for sure. 13" Pro with regular M2 is now gone and this 14" M3 Non-Pro is the replacement.
Guarantee that the base M3 with 3nm and faster GPU cores is faster than the M2 Pro chip that was in the prior 14 inch Pro, while being $400 cheaper.
 
Got an M2 Max 16" last month o_O
But, at least if I had waited, well it would be more money for the M3 equivalent. I'm missing Ray Tracing, and the AV1 decode. Which would get used A LOT for me anyway. AHHHHHHH APPLE!!! Couldn't wait one more year!?! :p
Progress.
I wasn't expecting a new(er) MacBook Pro this year, and my older intel i7 MBP 16" was OLD and HOT.
I would sell it at a lost and make up the difference or just work with it until you make back enough to buy the M4 or M5 models.
 
Still Lightning accessories lol.
The M3 looks like a decent upgrade for anyone still on an Intel machine, but even the M1 still holds its own.
They absolutely refused to compare it to the M2 series, which pretty much says everything.
They did compare to the M2 although the primary compare was M1.
 
I noticed that the 22 hours battery life comes with 70 watt hour battery. .

MacBook Air m2 has only 18 hours battery life but comes with 52.6 watt hour battery.


Dirty apple at it again….if we look at Consumption per watt, m2 wins
 
£3300 and you still only get 1TB of storage, even the 16" one for £4,099 is still only 1TB, what the hell Apple, should be 4TB at least for that price.

SSD prices have never been cheaper and they have the balls to charge these prices!
 
It's $400 cheaper so suck it up and order more RAM.
It's cheaper (and 8GB) because it's now the base chip, not the pro chip.

Thought it was weird that a base MBP laptop had a pro chip, and the best iMac desktop had a base chip... typically desktops are associated with more power, not less.

I was hoping for a M3Pro iMac, instead we got a M3 MBP. SMH.
 
It's cheaper (and 8GB) because it's now the base chip, not the pro chip.

Thought it was weird that a base MBP laptop had a pro chip, and the best iMac desktop had a base chip... typically desktops are associated with more power, not less.

I was hoping for a M3Pro iMac, instead we got a M3 MBP. SMH.
iMac is not a pro. It's designed for office or home use.
 
Guarantee that the base M3 with 3nm and faster GPU cores is faster than the M2 Pro chip that was in the prior 14 inch Pro, while being $400 cheaper.
It also has half the RAM, fewer CPU/GPU cores, supports less RAM, supports less storage (literally 1/4 as much!), only supports a single external display, and loses a USB-C port, so yeah, it's $400 cheaper because it's $400 less computer.
 
Huh? Had never changed anything on my Intel MBA and still using it for a good 10 years. Why does soldered or not is relevant? Your tech nerds are really weird.
It's not nerdiness.

In modern computers, storage and battery are the only components that degrade with time and eventually fail.

Apple restricts battery management features if you replace battery on your own, but it's not a huge deal. We (as a society) will deal with this later.

But soldered storage requires a lot of effort in order to be repaired (expensive soldering station, trained technicians, etc.), plus chips cannot be easily sourced because Apple prevents manufacturers from selling them.

With your workflows, SSD lasted for 10 years — great result, good for you. Mine workloads are probably very similar and don't hammer storage much. But there are people who work with photos, videos, music, etc. — they write lots of data, and it heavily wears out storage, so an SSD can easily die in two years or less.

Situation where you have to pay hundreds of dollars for replacing soldered chips instead of just buying off-the-shelf standard SSD hurts customers just as much as it hurts Apple (in terms of reputation, trust and such).
 

14 inch M3 Pro​

11-Core CPU​

14-Core GPU​

18GB Unified Memory​

512GB SSD Storage $3,499 in Australia​


14 inch M2 Pro​

10-Core CPU​

16-Core GPU​

16GB Unified Memory​

512GB SSD Storage $3,199 in Australia​

M3 pro chip has​

2GB more unified Memory​

1 Core CPU but 2 core GPU less​

What’s the difference ?​

 
I would sell it at a lost and make up the difference or just work with it until you make back enough to buy the M4 or M5 models.
I'm not sweating it. If I operated on the wait for the next one, I'd never get anything. And that intel MBP time had come. It was a poor design around that intel i7 chip. And the M2 that replaces barely gets luke warm doing the same exact things that would rev the fan up on the old one. For gaming, which is going to be "lite" in my case. I'd like to have Ray Tracing. But, for the additional cost to get M3 Max at roughly the same equivalent as the M2 Max I have. It be more money.

I'm ok. Really.... :oops:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top