It is also good to remember that Apple isn't in the market for cheap PCs.Please remember that some people were just in the market for a cheap mac.
It is included. It is part of the price. The rest is subjective.While the small form factor may be a great feature for some .. for others - arguably the majorit - it is not much of a feature, aka doesn't justify the higher pricepoint.
I would say the iMac... But again, people basically want a cheaper Mac. They like the design, they like MacOS, but don't want to pay for itIt is not like there is a comparable mac computer with similar specs, yet bigger formfactor for less money .. the mini was the only choice available and that got pretty much cut.
T.
just bought one last week but it hasn't been delivered yet...do you think i could be getting one of these instead?
Total rip off in the UK.![]()
I would say yes, but of you dont have a quick glance at the box and then send it back as part of the 14 days returns policy! Woohoo!
Please remember that some people were just in the market for a cheap mac. While the small form factor may be a great feature for some .. for others - arguably the majorit - it is not much of a feature, aka doesn't justify the higher pricepoint.
What is your point here?Mac Mini (2,4 Ghz, 2GB SDRAM) + Wireless keyboard + Magic Mouse + Apple Cinema Display = 1765,99
iMac = 1102,00
I want a Macmini, but not for any price. For a thousand euros I can get a quad core PC, with 24" screen and 1.5 TB harddisk and still have change.:
Indeed.
If you're in the market for a new monitor, wait for the iMac updates.
Otherwise, you're out of luck. There's no Mac Medium that uses 3.5" hard drives, can use a Core i5, and a discrete GPU.
Another factor in the cost is that Intel isn't dropping the prices of their CPUs, and has a high markup on the lower wattage variants. I'm sure Apple could trim $100 off by using a dual core Pentium at a lower speed, but they wouldn't lower themselves to that.
yea but the 320m's not that great either. I guess mac's are never going to be the choice for gaming. I've tried on my new MBP 15 but I can spend the same sort of money and get a very high end gaming pc. Guess im stuck with a pc for gaming after all.
Nobody beats Apple in design. Johny Ive is a LEGEND!
Hope their hardware department could just wake up.
Right, which was the oddest thing ever. Apart from being an odd number, too. The smallest Mac had more USB ports than any other Mac, including the Mac Pro. Removing one of them = A) mathematical coherence, and B) justice.![]()
How about you telling us a magic method of fitting a GPU that can drive a 2048 x 1536 display inside something 13mm thin?
Same here in Germany. They raised ALL prices and new MacMini is 809 Euro!!! WTF. Not a option any more... For that money you get an much better spec'd Notebook...
To make it clear:
700 USD = 570 Euro
809 Euro = 990 USD
I wonder how well this will run Final Cut Studio 3. Any ideas?
Too expensive! A great machine, definitely, but not worth the dough. $700 for a low power entry level machine? Pass.
Well, they kind of were with the mini ..It is also good to remember that Apple isn't in the market for cheap PCs.
Right .. still it explains why people feel the price is to high .. subjectively (is that even a word?).It is included. It is part of the price. The rest is subjective.
I think most people are fine paying a premium for the design and the OS. What people get upset about is the inclusion of a useless feature that has a large impact on the pricetag. Again "useless" being a subjective feeling.I would say the iMac... But again, people basically want a cheaper Mac. They like the design, they like MacOS, but don't want to pay for it![]()