Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Since this thread has over 600 posts already, I'm not even going to try to add something new to the discussion. Instead, I'll just add my two cents: raising the price by $100 every time you update the mini line is absurd. This used to be a $499 entry-level machine, designed to attract new Mac users. Now it's a boutique item.
 
This is nonsense.

Thumbs up for unibody, diy memory, integrated psu and hdmi

but, still no i3/i5, why is apple sooo far behind. no usb 3.0, no bluetooth 3.0, no blu-ray.
The lack of i3/i5 was and has been explained multiple times in this forum. If you don't understand the explaination then I'm not sure how anyone could possibly help you here.

As to USB3, are you out of your mind here as Apple will not ship USB3 until it is included in the chipsets it is using. You shoot your credibility dead when you imply that Apple should ship features its suppliers haven't even delivered yet.

As to Bluetooth and BluRay who really cares? The only thing I've ever used Bluetooth for is a mouse connection and the old standard is fine for that.
The design is excellent and i wouldn't mind paying the premium but the specs should be comparable to the market. Apple's supposed to be ahead not behind!
Yes the design seems to be pretty good. However your whine about the specs is BS. Nobody is shipping USB3 in machines built around off the shelf chipsets. That is because nobody is supporting USB3 yet, but feel free to find information on Intels or NVidias web sites that indicate otherwise. To put it simply Apple can't ship what doesn't exist.
Seems like the apple tv might soon disappear, Jobs wasn't too interested in talking about it at d8 either.

AppleTV is a classic example of Apple taking a good idea and screwing it up with excessive design effort. Sort of like the AIR. AIR could have been a much more interesting machine if function was an important element in it's design. Like wise AppleTV could have served up programming in a way that wasn't so limited by Apple plus the unit really needs to be connected to a file server.

In any event I'm impressed with the new Mini. The physical design is likely to be with us for awhile. I suspect that the design is really prep for the high integration chips that AMD and Intel will have ready for early 2011. That would mean a quad core Mini by the first quarter of 2011.


Dave
 
This is an amazing machine, Apple has finally made the Mac mini the way I wanted it. For the people that KEEP COMPLAINING OVER AND OVER about how expensive it is, maybe you should check out this nice Dell. A Much bigger dinosaur, ugly, plastic, DDR2 ram, slower processor, lower grade GPU and of course it only runs Windows...yuk...but only Windows natively.

But...the people who are complaining about the Mini's PRICE are complaining about the PRICE...not complaining that it is too big or too small...or that it compares poorly to a Dell Hybrid for style/size/design.

The Mini is Apple's CHEAPEST computer. Period. That being said, it's a PRICE BARRIER to a lot of people who can find hundreds of Windows desktop model pcs for $449-$700 if not cheaper. Again, I'm talking about price. And, as a consumer, that $449-$700 price range in the PC world will allow me to get either a full tower or a slim tower or a cute little box like the Mini. Also, when purchasing a $449-$700 desktop pc, you're gonna get the keyboard and mouse...AND A MONITOR.

All this being said, the folks that jump on this forum that tout the Mini is a great looking media center are correct...it's very attractive looking...the price is competitive to a cute little Windows box. However, I would guess that a large percentage of consumers who wish to purchase their first Mac (for reasons other than a media center) are gonna be pretty bummed about the price.

I was considering buying my dad a Mini later this summer (I thought the new models would roll out in August)...to replace his PERFECTLY WORKING 6 year old Dell slim tower (figured I would get him something super small to put on his desk)...but $700 is nuts...and I'd have to spend $100+ for a mouse and keyboard. I might as well consider an iMac for $1100+ at that point (but he has a great monitor already). So, unfortunately for dad and Apple, I will not be purchasing the new Mini...especially for such lackluster technical improvements.

Everyone uses a desktop computer differently...and to me, and a lot of others out there, $700 for a desktop computer with no monitor, no keyboard, and no mouse is crazy...and has been crazy for 10+ years. Especially if all you're going to do is use the internet (via a browser that offers the exact experience on any physical machine in the world), email, photos, and the occasional MS Office-type doc.

-Eric
 
That was one year and eight months ago. No excuses anymore. Apple are lagging and lagging badly when it comes to supporting serious film fans.

I would argue that serious film fans have a dedicated Blu-Ray player already. On top of that, as someone else noted, it's in Apple's interest to sell video content via downloading and/or streaming. You don't have to like the absence of Blu-Ray but it shouldn't be surprising.
 
I wonder how easily this new Mini can be upgraded (specifically the Hard Drive)
I noticed it only has 5400 rpm drives available, I'd love to get a mini then throw in a 7200rpm 500GB drive of my own.
 
Blu Ray is dead. The way of the future is to make HD content available via streaming and download. The average user could care less about the quality of Blu Ray (just like the average user did not care about the superior quality of the compact disc over MP3).

As bandwidth increases the higher quality will be made available.

1)Not sure where you've been the last 16 months but BR is certainly not dead. It's taking off like mad. I wondered back in 2008 if BR was going to die quickly and to my pleasant surprise it has not. I own about 30 titles, each of which I've paid a street price of about $17. True that BR may not be mainstream in computers yet, but dvd technology took a few years to get into computers, too. The only reason I personally would like a BR in my computer is so that I can write 25GB or 50GB of data to a single disc rather than the 4/8GB dvd limit right now.

2)You are greatly mistaken if you think HD movies will be streamed to your HD tv anytime soon IN MASS QUANTITY with 100% adoption like standard cable tv has had for decades. There are numerous threads about this topic (mostly technical arguments/limitations/user adoption issues) and it's far too long to restart it now. We all envision it, but it's at least a decade from reality. I remember the promises of streamed HD content back in 2002...almost nothing has changed. My cable company barely offers 25 HD channels and the PPV service is the worst.
 
Blu Ray is dead. The way of the future is to make HD content available via streaming and download...

Do not spread a lie or propel the marketing myth.

In the first two months of the year more blu-rays were sold than all purchased streams and downloads for the entire 2009 year.

And blu-ray sales have steadily increased since then.

iTunes HD movies are really not that great and even the average consumer can see the difference when compared to the blu-ray version.
 
Was probably expecting too much, but the Bullring store (Birmingham uk) doesn't have a display model yet. I'm interested to see how hot they get after being left on and used all day.
 
Apple´s slogan with the new Mac Minis should be:

"You´re not only paying for what´s there, you´re paying for what isn´t there". ;)

By that I mean the empty space. Yes, you are paying for empty space. "So there´s no display with it or other things that could take space, that´s gonna cost you extra!". :apple:



p.s. Blu-ray was dead even before it was born.
 
Blue ray is not dead. In order to kill it, the internet needs to get faster. Streaming iTunes movies over WiFi takes too long (however...on the same note...it takes like ten minutes to start a blu ray film to begin with!)
 
The point is, the form factor doesn't get you anything. If it were a half-inch wider, would it be anything less than what it is? No. It's impressive that Apple managed to squeeze all that stuff into that box . . . but there's no reason the box has to be THAT small, when it could be twice as compelling with a only little more horsepower.

Then by all means, buy a Inspiron or XPS desktop and be done with it. Apple offers a SFF PC, like the Studio Hybrid.

And it's false to say the form factor doesn't do anything. Maybe it's not important to you, but don't presume you speak for everyone. Some people much prefer having a very small footprint PC, the smaller the better, hence why there's a market for these (mini-itx boards, Studio hybrid, the Zino series, Mac Mini).
 
I wonder how easily this new Mini can be upgraded (specifically the Hard Drive)
I noticed it only has 5400 rpm drives available, I'd love to get a mini then throw in a 7200rpm 500GB drive of my own.

I think the answer is quite simple, Why would you buy this crap in a first place? You can buy much much better PC for $500 with the CPU and graphics and HD and BD you want.
 
Blue ray is not dead. In order to kill it, the internet needs to get faster. Streaming iTunes movies over WiFi takes too long (however...on the same note...it takes like ten minutes to start a blu ray film to begin with!)

Lots of people already have 100MB/10MB internet connections and not even costing a lot. And it´s only going to get faster and cheaper. 1GB connections are coming soon.

So better start selling your Blu-ray collection already. ;)
 
:) good job,

:D very nice looks more expensive than the last one love the look more sleeker and tidier (it is lol)no blueRay but got the HDMI right,your getting there Apple slowly but surely.new mac pros?
 
Lots of people already have 100MB/10MB internet connections and not even costing a lot. And it´s only going to get faster and cheaper. 1GB connections are coming soon.

Tell me from where I can download BR quality movie today. You can not! What's wrong with Apple fans willing to wait for bright future when Flash is dead and BR is dead? Normal people are just enjoying their lives right now. Keep in mind that by the time you finally are able to watch BR quality movies from the Internet you may not even want it anymore.
 
well i am thinking i will go to it and move my mac mini i use right now as my media computer to being my main use computer and the new mini to media computer i will upgrade the ram to 4 gigs and it will be then the price of what i paid for the late 09 one i have now
but it will be in november as my birthday is the 22 and xmas is right there a month later so its easier to justify getting it as a birthday xmas present
 
Oh, I dunno... if I hadn't blown money on high-end electronics back in 1995 when I was unemployed, I never would've learned web design back when web designers were hard to find. Now I'm running my own multimedia company. I'd probably still be unemployed if I hadn't blown that money in the mid 90's... it was a huge money and time saver compared to going the educational route (there really was no such thing as educational programs for multimedia designers back then anyway).

That's different. But yes, I agree that people investing in their skills or trying to start a business do need to buy things. The note here was "filling out unemployment forms" not "learning to design web sites".
 
Perhaps I could have worded it better. 'Apple have made me lose interest in buying their products until they start supporting blu ray'. Make more sense? I seriously just can't justify spending any large ammount of money on a machine that supports DVD only. It's antiquated and silly. So much for Steve Jobs supporting products in their 'springs'.

As for your claim that blu ray is dead, I know what you're trying to get at, but you're not really seeing the reality of the situation here. Film enthusiasts want quality. I don't know where you get your statistics to say that the average consumer is happy with downloadable HD content. Home theatre enthusiasts want nothing but blu ray. This is so for various reasons. iTunes for example supplies sub standard quality films, often for a larger price than blu ray. It is actually ridiculous. No special features, pathetic quality on a decent TV, and what's worse, very little support for sub titles and foreign languages. I see iTunes movies as elitist and a kick in the teeth for people with hearing impairment or from a language background other than english.

In an ideal world you would be right. I really don't like physical mediums either. But we arn't quite there yet and won't be for a long time. The day iTunes start offering films with foreign language options, 1080p quality and special features, is the day that I will agree with you and say that the blu ray is dead. Until then, it is the ONLY medium that film enthusiasts and people with any taste for quality will opt for.

Great post. I'm with you in that I don't like physical mediums either and yet you've made absolutely clear why iTunes is still not even close to ready for serious video.
 
Blue ray is not dead. In order to kill it, the internet needs to get faster. Streaming iTunes movies over WiFi takes too long (however...on the same note...it takes like ten minutes to start a blu ray film to begin with!)

Less than 30 seconds on the new Sony BDPS 70 series! Mmmm 3D, WiFi, iPad/iPhone BD Remote app connectivity. Yeah, the Japanese tech companies still own home theatre.

Sony_BDP-S770_Blu-ray_3D_Player_2_540x295.jpg


Which brings me to another point! Not only does blu-ray win out over iTunes movies in terms of visual and audio quality, but 3D! Are there even any 3D movies on iTunes at all?! 3D capable machines are the future, not downloadable crap from the iTunes store. I was using the Samsung 3D player in the store the other day, insane technology. The player was actually communicating with the 3D glasses I was wearing and altering the visual conditions somehow. Apple fanboy's who kid themselves into thinking iTunes is the forefront of film technology are seriously delusional.
 
replaced by iPad?

The Mac Mini was Apple's entry-level model for basic computer tasks in a time when the pc metaphor was the way to go. Now they have the iPad for 90% of common computer tasks, so maybe they refocused the Mac Mini to prevent those two products from cannibalizing each other, although I don't know what exactly their new focus is. It's now too expensive for anything but a designer pc. There is a market for htpc's, but that's at (at least) half the price and without a desktop OS.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.