No it didn't. The only Mac with dual link DVI were the old non-unibody MacBook Pro and the Mac Pro. Anything else including the mini had mini-DVI. The difference? Mini-DVI is single link DVI and thus limited to 1920x1200. What does HDMI do right now? 1920x1200. Since HDMI is compatible with DVI you only need a fairly cheap cable with HDMI on one end and DVI on the other end. Guess what's supplied with the new Mac mini?Excited about HDMI? Didn't this replace dual link DVI that could drive 2560x1600 resolution displays, that HDMI can't.
I hardly believe that considering all the misinformation in your post...Seriously uninterested. I wouldn't mind giving OSX a whirl, but there has never been a Mac that interested me and it doesn't seem to be any sign of that changing.
It does seem they are anti blu-Ray on all of their systems. Wonder why
Tell me from where I can download BR quality movie today. You can not! What's wrong with Apple fans willing to wait for bright future when Flash is dead and BR is dead? Normal people are just enjoying their lives right now. Keep in mind that by the time you finally are able to watch BR quality movies from the Internet you may not even want it anymore.
Tell me from where I can download BR quality movie today. You can not! What's wrong with Apple fans willing to wait for bright future when Flash is dead and BR is dead? Normal people are just enjoying their lives right now. Keep in mind that by the time you finally are able to watch BR quality movies from the Internet you may not even want it anymore.
A great many 30" displays don't have Display Port. Including this one:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9179LL/A
You need to buy a $100 adapter that is from reviews, junk.
My 3.2GHz Quad core is in my living room, sitting right next to my HDTV. It drives my HDTV a second monitor on my desk.
So no I don't understand. I chose quiet components, so I don't hear my PC even thought it is right next to my TV. I also added a Blu Ray Drive so it works as my Blu Ray player as well.
I don't get the obsession with small when it creates a limited, un-expandable, underpowered and expensive computer.
Blue ray is not dead. In order to kill it, the internet needs to get faster.
No it didn't. The only Mac with dual link DVI were the
I hardly believe that considering all the misinformation in your post...
Perhaps I could have worded it better. 'Apple have made me lose interest in buying their products until they start supporting blu ray'. Make more sense? I seriously just can't justify spending any large ammount of money on a machine that supports DVD only. It's antiquated and silly. So much for Steve Jobs supporting products in their 'springs'.
As for your claim that blu ray is dead, I know what you're trying to get at, but you're not really seeing the reality of the situation here. Film enthusiasts want quality. I don't know where you get your statistics to say that the average consumer is happy with downloadable HD content. Home theatre enthusiasts want nothing but blu ray. This is so for various reasons. iTunes for example supplies sub standard quality films, often for a larger price than blu ray. It is actually ridiculous. No special features, pathetic quality on a decent TV, and what's worse, very little support for sub titles and foreign languages. I see iTunes movies as elitist and a kick in the teeth for people with hearing impairment or from a language background other than english.
In an ideal world you would be right. I really don't like physical mediums either. But we arn't quite there yet and won't be for a long time. The day iTunes start offering films with foreign language options, 1080p quality and special features, is the day that I will agree with you and say that the blu ray is dead. Until then, it is the ONLY medium that film enthusiasts and people with any taste for quality will opt for.
Okay, so what am I supposed to do in between Blu Ray being dead and "the future," where I can instantly suck down 4-8GB of full-quality HD video of any movie I care to watch? Blu-Ray isn't dead, it's just getting warmed up.
I realize that Steve thinks anything worth watching is on iTunes or YouTube, but at some point reality steps in--and by "reality," I don't mean "BitTorrent streams of ripped Blu-Ray discs".
Peace
Ty
Here in the Communist dictatorship of Sweden the price is up 33% from the previous model.
975 U$ incl. VAT
Welcome Zotac ...
Actually, I have VUDU service and get 1080P movie streaming regularly.
To add to that list and comment on some of the items.
Positives:
- Comes with HDMI-to-DVI adapter (this is now uncommon for Apple)
- Easier access to RAM
Never used such.[*]No IR port (It may be old tech but it's still universal and useful)
If it is a solid block then I doubt they would be using it for an antenna. As to CNCing the machines are not a huge cost issue, the traditional problem is the cost of the machinist. That is not a problem if you are paying them only 3 or 400 dollars a month.[*]Milled from block of aluminium which hopefully means that's part of the WiFi/BT antenna but also means they have really perfected their CNC, which has historically been too costly for CE.
I'm not following this.[*]85W max internal power adapter (this equals the max power of the MBP and what the 24" LED Cinema Display can push to. IOW, it means that a simple adapter from the standard power plug to MagSafe means that you will be able to get rid of another cable if you use both)
Negatives:
- I agree that it's pricey but I have a feeling the engineering and design will increase the net profit over the previous version. So, sucks for us, but not for them, though I have no interest in a mini-desktop machine as it is.
There is nothing good about BluRay. I know that upsets people that have been hoodwinked into believing otherwise but it is the truth. Personnally I don't want to have anything at all to do with BluRay or support the idiotcy that justifies the policies of the BluRay organization.[*]Blu-ray is a negative in and of itself even though it's great for a home theater. I'm sure someone will say that there are Blu-ray players for under $100. Great, but I doubt anyone can find a 9.5mm ultra-slim slot-loading BRD for under $600. It's not just about iTS, it's about the lack of available drives for the products Apple sells. One can argue they don't have to go so thin, but that's telling Apple to change it's core nature, which is a foolish argument against any company.
I haven't read the detailed specs yet but I'm wondering how fast that port is? If it can read fast it would be a good place for a boot partition. Of course that would mean a fast SD card of 64GB or more.[*]Lack of front ports is expected even though it does suck. You can always get a cheap USB and/or card reader and have that snake to the front so you can't fiddling with the back.
You don't have to rely upon Apple for HTPC software.[*]No info on an updated FrontRow or the inclusion of BackRow to make this a true HTPC. I'm sure this release means that there will be a new TV with no local storage running iOS, and it will be unbelievably tiny, but keeping this hobbled after you add HDMI seems silly to me.
[*]No Mac OS X Server install on SD card or USB stick since it doesn't have an internal or included ODD.
Actually, From your description bluray would be the elitist route.
but this is a consumer oriented machine aimed at getting as much out to consumers as possible. .