Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Last edited:
I’ve never had one on Windows 10, sounds like you haven’t even used it :rolleyes:

I had like 10 of them and had to keep rebooting to get back into the system with a Windows error which i do not recall the code, but yes it does still happen. And i am not saying that Apple does not get a Kernel Panics but is seems like it happens more on the Windows 10 side of the world. Because of less software to hardware integration.
 
So if you build me a computer what is your turn around time to repair it when i live 2000 miles from you.

I'm sorry, I didn't realise you lived in Antarctica.

So are you going to pay someone to come to my house and pick it up mail it out and get it back to me in 48 hours? And of course the parts should cost me nothing. And I should be able to call you any time day or night for questions and troubleshooting just like Applecare does.

No, because I'm not in the business of PC supply & service. Anybody who is in that business, though, absolutely - probably with on-site 24 hour service. Probably local. In fact, since everybody is selling the same generic Intel or AMD systems, you'll probably pick the supplier based on their service package.

Of course, if you're a one-man band and you built the computer yourself, you just order the new part yourself with next-day delivery, for a fraction of the price that Apple or HP or whoever would charge you for an official part, and plug it in (no glue, security screws, proprietary connectors etc.) But, true, if you're in a non-Mom-and-Pop business you'll probably pay someone to do it.

which could now be done only with one of these Mac pro's are selling.

...and which part of the new Mac Pro magically enables that? The Intel CPU (same as PCs use)? The AMD GPU (same as PCs use... well, except a lot of pro software is optimised for NVIDIA)? The motherboard made by Foxconn (based on intel reference designs?) or is the T2 chip somehow involved? Reality: any suitably-specced Xeon kit + GPU bought in 2019/20 will have the power, and - for such a specialist setup - the best kit to get will be determined by the choice of software and what service plan the vendor is offering. If the best software for the job happens to be for MacOS then, fine. Its a business - regardless of how much the room cost (which is sunk cost now, anyway) - the accountants will buy the $20k generic PC that is adequate for the job over the £25k Mac with the snazzy grille... and if you're really lucky they won't forget the "adequate for the job" bit.

Of course, business purchases on that scale don't get made by someone wandering into the local Apple Store with their titanium credit card - so we don't know what sort of prices they'll actually negotiate with serious customers. If Pixar buys a lab full of these they'll probably at least get a display stand or two thrown in.
 
So... low end video card. 4 sticks of memory by default in a six channel memory system... Only 256GB of storage for an expandable tower, asking $3500 too much.

If you're serious professional in to video editing or scientific software, I don't know why you'd bother with Mac OS. Seems most shops use another Unix variant of some kind that can offer superior performance.

What are video editors and scientists running that work better on Mac OS?
Apple Motion and Final Cut, Millumin. Mac only.
 
I had like 10 of them and had to keep rebooting to get back into the system with a Windows error which i do not recall the code, but yes it does still happen. And i am not saying that Apple does not get a Kernel Panics but is seems like it happens more on the Windows 10 side of the world. Because of less software to hardware integration.
Sounds like a problem with your end if 10 of them are having issues like you claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Nope. It's the systems integration. For example, the workstation I use has double walls on the chassis.

So... not a Mac Pro, then?

You're describing features of higher-end cases, workstation-class motherboards, the Xeon and its associated chipset. "Custom Built" (by a technically knowledgable power user or - more likely in a pro setting - by an independent OEM) does not mean "Thrown together from the shonkiest components you can find on eBay".
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
So... not a Mac Pro, then?

You're describing features of higher-end cases, workstation-class motherboards, the Xeon and its associated chipset. "Custom Built" (by a technically knowledgable power user or - more likely in a pro setting - by an independent OEM) does not mean "Thrown together from the shonkiest components you can find on eBay".

At the workstation and above level, "independent OEM" means they buy a barebones system from Supermicro and install a CPU, RAM, Storage and GPU. That's it. Motherboards and fans and cooling and power supplies all came pre-installed or at least included. The workstation form factors are all proprietary anyway.

This is not a "DIY PC" as you said or people building PCs expect.

Besides, Supermicro stuff is pretty crappy. Been there done that. Plastic that snaps off, convoluted firmware updates, spares that are difficult to find, loud whining fans, lack of documentation and diagnostics...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
At the workstation and above level, "independent OEM" means they buy a barebones system from Supermicro and install a CPU, RAM, Storage and GPU. That's it. Motherboards and fans and cooling and power supplies all came pre-installed. This is not a "DIY PC" as you said or people building PCs expect.

And when it crashes and burns, do you call Supermicro, do you call intel or amd for the processor, do you call western digital or Seagate for the storage problem do you call AMD or Nvidia when the GPU dies and can you get me up and running with out having to run out and spend more money trying to find out what component is causing the problem with the system. Oh yea can not call some of these manufactures 24x7 also? So ether i have to run out and buy replacement components to find the problem with the system or trying to track and find out what manufactures part is at fault. Oh and i have to have the system back in complete working order in 12 hours because I am a 24x7 shop on a tight budget oh and the local best buy does not have my part in stock i have to order it?
 
...and which part of the new Mac Pro magically enables that? The Intel CPU (same as PCs use)? The AMD GPU (same as PCs use... well, except a lot of pro software is optimised for NVIDIA)? T

Show me a PC build with 1.5TB of ram and a quad AMD GPU setup with 128GB video memory. It is literally not "the same GPU PCs use," at all...you can't even buy a Pro VEGA II Duo for PC.

You also can't buy Apple's Afterburner card for a PC either, and for video production houses, that thing can pay for itself many times over with the time it will save in production workflows.

I do video production on a Windows 10 PC with an Nvidia GPU almost exclusively (I also have an iMac Pro at home), so I'm looking at this from both sides of the lens. Comparing the Mac Pro to PCs is really kind of an Apple and Oranges comparison. There are a lot of components, both hardware and software, that aren't comparable 1:1.

EDIT: Also, I hate Windows 10 more and more every week. You know what's awesome? When you start an overnight render and Windows Update forces an update install that you can't postpone any longer, and you come back to an empty render folder.
 
And when it crashes and burns, do you call Supermicro, do you call intel or amd for the processor, do you call western digital or Seagate for the storage problem do you call AMD or Nvidia when the GPU dies and can you get me up and running with out having to run out and spend more money trying to find out what component is causing the problem with the system. Oh yea can not call some of these manufactures 24x7 also? So ether i have to run out and buy replacement components to find the problem with the system or trying to track and find out what manufactures part is at fault. Oh and i have to have the system back in complete working order in 12 hours because I am a 24x7 shop on a tight budget oh and the local best buy does not have my part in stock i have to order it?
I’ve argued for a long time the service you get for just about any Apple product justifies the “Apple Tax.”
 
Spoken as someone with apparently little experience with workstations or the reason certain users are more than willing to fork over big bucks for them. Take a look at Xeon workstations from Dell, Lenovo and HP and report back on how overpriced Apple is lol.

Comparing Xeon W-3200 series to any Core model shows many key differences. They are not equivalent in any sense of the word.

The Xeons in the Mac Pro give those who need them up to 28 cores/56 threads, and 1.5TB of RAM. (btw HP charges $112,000 for the 1.5TB config and $56,000 for the 768GB config for their Z8; luckily there’s a 20% discount.)

Is your application constrained by memory bandwidth? The W-3200 series offers six memory channels. That has value. ECC memory exists for a reason, and is important for example when you’ve got hundreds of gigabytes of RAM and are running long simulations.

Certain vectorized workloads benefit greatly from AVX-512 instructions and such increased performance should not be minimized. And if you require a ton of I/O, 64 PCIe lanes can be important. None of those features are available in consumer chips.

Clock speeds and IPC are but two of many factors that determine overall performance for any particular user’s workload. A Radeon Pro 580X is a perfectly appropriate config to purchase, as is a 256GB SSD.

That you don’t understand that, or why some need and will purchase the Mac Pro (or six-figure Intel Xeon—not AMD—workstations from HP and others) is fine, but doesn’t really position you to opine about how others don’t know enough about the hardware.

Except this is still a bad argument, because you can still acquire a base model non-Mac Pro with the same specs for far less with the same PCIE lanes and upgrade options. The straw man argument of mentioning top-end Xeon workstations that are fully loaded vs the price of the base Mac Pro is ridiculous. AVX512 and ECC are not unique to the Mac Pro, and neither are expansion options, but like I said before, at least it runs MacOS (albeit with no 32 bit application support)
 
Anyone who amortizes their computer purchases and makes money with them likely is already invested in PC/Windows, not Mac. Apple lost the pro market years ago with the trashcan. You don't expect studios to abandon their investment in PCs just because Apple decided, 10 years too late, that it wanted to re-enter the serious Pro market? Even though I like this new Mac Pro, it's going to be an epic fail for Apple.

ARM-based Macs are coming in 2020/2021. Buying this Mac Pro is going to be the shortest-lived and worst investment anyone is going to make in Apple gear.
FYI. I freelance in the live events business. Design and operation. Every production company I work with uses Macs for delivering video and graphics (occasionally a media server but usually a Mac). They use trash cans, recently iMac Pros and since they used to use the old cheese grater Macs, I bet I’ll see the new MacPros eventually. Macs are simply more reliable and easier to use for live event productions.
 
I'm interested as to how many people will buy these. They seem laser focused on the hollywood/pro video markets, especially considering the new display. Relatively limited market, even for Apple.

Yeah I don't get it.

> $5,999 in the United States with an eight-core Intel Xeon processor, 32GB of ECC RAM, Radeon Pro 580X graphics, and 256GB of SSD storage.

Other than the Xeons, it's just a tower with 32GB RAM, a 256GB SSD and a 580X

For less than 1/2 the price I got a Mini with a 6-core i5, 16GB RAM (could upgrade to 32GB), a 256GB SSD and an RX Vega 64 (via an eGPU).

I know the Mac Pro is a lot better in many ways (and the eGPU has bottlenecks...etc). However, the Mac Pro still just seems so expensive for what it is!
 
Yeah I don't get it.

> $5,999 in the United States with an eight-core Intel Xeon processor, 32GB of ECC RAM, Radeon Pro 580X graphics, and 256GB of SSD storage.

Other than the Xeons, it's just a tower with 32GB RAM, a 256GB SSD and a 580X

For less than 1/2 the price I got a Mini with a 6-core i5, 16GB RAM (could upgrade to 32GB), a 256GB SSD and an RX Vega 64 (via an eGPU).

I know the Mac Pro is a lot better in many ways (and the eGPU has bottlenecks...etc). However, the Mac Pro still just seems so expensive for what it is!

Here's a company that does configurable PC workstations

Comparable Workstation PC

Aventum 3 Pro is $8789 with a 28 core Xeon (about $3,000) and a really crappy Quadro GPU ($116).

So to compare to Mac Pro Base Model, totally remove the CPU and GPU from Aventum, and you're still at $5673. Now add the Mac Pro Base Model CPU and GPU (about $1500 of parts), and you're at $7173. But the Aventum setup only has 4 PCI-e slots versus the Mac Pro's 8 slots. Aventum also has a weaker power supply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Stepfan
Seriously. People who think this is too overpriced probably wouldn't even max out a Mac mini w/ their daily workloads.

Funny you should mention that.

In March I'll be retiring my venerable Classic Mac Pro (2009 4,1 --> 5,1 - see signature) and going with a Mac Mini fully decked out (i7 / 64GB / 1TB / eGPU) for less than half the price of the new New Mac Pro because as a print designer / illustrator, the new Mac Pro was clearly not designed for me anyway.

I always liked having a top of the line machine (for a while at least), but bragging rights alone aren't worth the entry price any more. If anything, I'll thank Apple for forcing me to recognize that my computing needs are no longer cutting edge like they were back in the 90's when I bought a llfx for $10K.

The Mac Mini should be plenty of computer for what I do. Plus it will be easier to haul the mini to trade shows for my art demonstrations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tucom
Funny you should mention that.

In March I'll be retiring my venerable Classic Mac Pro (2009 4,1 --> 5,1 - see signature) and going with a Mac Mini fully decked out (i7 / 64GB / 1TB / eGPU) for less than half the price of the new New Mac Pro because as a print designer / illustrator, the new Mac Pro was clearly not designed for me anyway.

I always liked having a top of the line machine (for a while at least), but bragging rights alone aren't worth the entry price any more. If anything, I'll thank Apple for forcing me to recognize that my computing needs are no longer cutting edge like they were back in the 90's when I bought a llfx for $10K.

The Mac Mini should be plenty of computer for what I do. Plus it will be easier to haul the mini to trade shows for my art demonstrations.

Here's the thing...consider that the work you did in the past that called for the fastest Mac on two wheels can now be done on something that can be put in a backpack and carried with you on a plane or a train is a incredible achievement technology wise. That the software that you used wasn't optimized very well back in the 1990's and while CPUs and GPUs advanced, so did development environments, operating systems and the programmer's skills to optimize the code.

And while your computing needs may no longer be cutting edge, your skills have gotten better, sharper and more optimized as well though years of practice, experience and experimentation with what works and what doesn't, AKA, The School of Hard Knocks.
 
Except this is still a bad argument, because you can still acquire a base model non-Mac Pro with the same specs for far less with the same PCIE lanes and upgrade options. The straw man argument of mentioning top-end Xeon workstations that are fully loaded vs the price of the base Mac Pro is ridiculous. AVX512 and ECC are not unique to the Mac Pro, and neither are expansion options, but like I said before, at least it runs MacOS (albeit with no 32 bit application support)
Assuming you are done with the 8-core Xeon is basically a 9900k with ECC and AVX-512 crap—re-read my reply to that if you’re not—and you’re now just spouting the “Macs are overpriced” BS I’ve heard for the last 35 years, we can do that.

How much do you think the base Mac Pro should cost?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
Yup, and that's what enthusiasts/hobbyists are going to do in 3-4 years time when "pro" buyers have finished writing their Mac Pros off against tax (or the leases are up) and their service plans have expired.



Yes, I do understand the idea of offsetting capital expenses against person-hours. Good luck with that argument if you have to get the purchase signed off by a beancounter. If not - you still need to either have the cash up front (or sufficient credit - which costs more money). Or lease (which costs more money - and restricts your options at the end of 3/4 years). If its a mission-critical tool then you're pretty much obliged to have some sort of fast-response service plan, which limits the time you have to break even. Also, economy often dictates that you should replace once you've finished reclaiming the tax (and if you're not the boss you might not get to choose). Even then, you are presuming that having a Mac Pro rather than a cheaper alternative is going to somehow save you time.
I guess his whole point about beancounters (and one I made less artfully) is if you are in a smallish to medium sized business you can avoid that pitfall.
 
Show me a PC build with 1.5TB of ram and a quad AMD GPU setup with 128GB video memory. It is literally not "the same GPU PCs use," at all...you can't even buy a Pro VEGA II Duo for PC.

Here's a motherboard with 1.5TB RAM capacity: https://www.gigabyte.com/uk/Motherboard/C621-WD12-rev-10#kf

...also has the ability to take 4 double-width GPU cards... oh, and two Xeon CPUs (Intel does a 56 core Xeon that supports dual processor configurations, so you can have 112 cores if you like - show me a Mac Pro build with 112 cores).

Here's an AMD EPYC motherboard that takes 2TB RAM and up to 32 core processors: https://www.gigabyte.com/uk/Server-Motherboard/MZ31-AR0-rev-1x#ov

That's just what I turned up with a quick Google. There are other sites that do a huge range of workstation/server-class motherboards or sell systems where you can choose pretty much every component.

you can't even buy a Pro VEGA II Duo for PC.

You can't even buy a VEGA II Duo for Mac Pro - or a Mac Pro to put it in, - yet. Do you think AMD aren't going to release PC versions of their new GPUs?

The new Mac Pro has an insane number of PCIe slots and a huge RAM capacity not through some magical Apple innovation but because Intel's new Q2 2019 Xeon-W chips have more PCIe lanes and RAM channels on a single CPU than previous models - Most currently available Xeon systems/motherboards needed dual processors to get that capacity (of course, that means they can also have twice as many cores ).

You also can't buy Apple's Afterburner card for a PC either

...what... you can't buy a custom accelerator card for Apple's proprietary video codec for PC? Colour me shocked. That would mean that if you use Apple proprietary software you're locked into Mac until you get fed up and change to PC (where, as far as I can tell, dedicated accelerator cards like the Red Rocket are being dropped because everybody used NVIDIA CUDA.... Ooops.)

As I've said before - if you're completely committed to MacOS software or formats, the new Mac Pro will keep you going until Apple gets bored and leaves it for 6 years without an update. Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.