Many people only compare raw specs to the PC world.
I love Mac OS and its usability. And the fact that it doesn't slow down within a few months. And the fact that is reliable. And the fact that Time Machine backs my data up and I don't need to worry about that. And the fact that I can reinstall and have all my settings and stuff back with no trouble. And the fact that I can buy a new computer and transfer everything and it is identical to my old one... All these things also factor into my decision to buy an Apple computer, even if it is more expensive at the same raw specs.
Even if you let out the OS, there are more things that are incomparable. The build quality, the looks, the value of an aluminum enclosure that is sturdy, Keyboard and Trackpad quality, Display quality, the value they retain for selling it later on eBay, etc etc.
If you are always gonna compare Laptops/Computers by taking into account only the chipset, the CPU and the amount of RAM you will always find that Apple is more expensive. But you are omitting a lot of added value on the Apple machine in that comparison which is quite unfair in my opinion.
I use Laptops as my primary machines. I am prepared to pay the premium Apple wants, yes. But that doesn't mean I swim in money or am willing to throw it out the window for stuff I don't need.
Things like CPU speed are definitely something that I don't need. The main speed up in everyday usage comes from the now included SSD, not the CPU. Why should I pay more for a CPU that is 10% faster if I'm not gonna use that? The 4GB on the other hand I do need, so I also took that upgrade. I need it because I run Windows Applications side-by-side and having 2GB RAM total for Mac OS + Windows 7 is very short.
For me the calculation was easy. I have been using a 1700€ MacBook Pro 15" until now. I manually bought and put an 380€ Intel 160 GB SSD into it as well. This means it is around 2100€ totally. I have been thinking about going 13" for a while now, the main factor that held me back was the lower resolution. I don't wanna go lower than the 1440x900 on my MBP. Now Apple has provided a computer with that same resolution at 13", same amount of RAM (4 GB), a slightly slower but integrated 128 GB SSD, at a total price of 1390€. So in essence I save 720€, and get a lighter, thinner machine that is more portable, which I like. I also lose 2,4GHz -> 1,86GHz CPU speed, but I don't care. I lose the Ethernet port but I'm not using it anyway. I lose the optical drive, which I have never used. I lose 2" which I had been preparing to lose for a long time. So it is a perfect solution for me - why not?
Why should I max out on things that I seriously see no value in?
I love Mac OS and its usability. And the fact that it doesn't slow down within a few months. And the fact that is reliable. And the fact that Time Machine backs my data up and I don't need to worry about that. And the fact that I can reinstall and have all my settings and stuff back with no trouble. And the fact that I can buy a new computer and transfer everything and it is identical to my old one... All these things also factor into my decision to buy an Apple computer, even if it is more expensive at the same raw specs.
Even if you let out the OS, there are more things that are incomparable. The build quality, the looks, the value of an aluminum enclosure that is sturdy, Keyboard and Trackpad quality, Display quality, the value they retain for selling it later on eBay, etc etc.
If you are always gonna compare Laptops/Computers by taking into account only the chipset, the CPU and the amount of RAM you will always find that Apple is more expensive. But you are omitting a lot of added value on the Apple machine in that comparison which is quite unfair in my opinion.
I use Laptops as my primary machines. I am prepared to pay the premium Apple wants, yes. But that doesn't mean I swim in money or am willing to throw it out the window for stuff I don't need.
Things like CPU speed are definitely something that I don't need. The main speed up in everyday usage comes from the now included SSD, not the CPU. Why should I pay more for a CPU that is 10% faster if I'm not gonna use that? The 4GB on the other hand I do need, so I also took that upgrade. I need it because I run Windows Applications side-by-side and having 2GB RAM total for Mac OS + Windows 7 is very short.
For me the calculation was easy. I have been using a 1700€ MacBook Pro 15" until now. I manually bought and put an 380€ Intel 160 GB SSD into it as well. This means it is around 2100€ totally. I have been thinking about going 13" for a while now, the main factor that held me back was the lower resolution. I don't wanna go lower than the 1440x900 on my MBP. Now Apple has provided a computer with that same resolution at 13", same amount of RAM (4 GB), a slightly slower but integrated 128 GB SSD, at a total price of 1390€. So in essence I save 720€, and get a lighter, thinner machine that is more portable, which I like. I also lose 2,4GHz -> 1,86GHz CPU speed, but I don't care. I lose the Ethernet port but I'm not using it anyway. I lose the optical drive, which I have never used. I lose 2" which I had been preparing to lose for a long time. So it is a perfect solution for me - why not?
Why should I max out on things that I seriously see no value in?