And somehow the 2012 version will remain in the line up at $1,000+ dollars.
And just as performant.
And somehow the 2012 version will remain in the line up at $1,000+ dollars.
I don't think MacBook Air will have retina display.13" Retina MacBook Air? With multiple USB (C?) ports? I like the sound of that...
I don't know, my Macbook was saved several times by the MagSafe. The removal of MagSafe would be quite bizarre. Especially since as far as I know Apple has patented it and refused to license the patent, after copying the idea themselves, showing typical Apple ethics and generosity of spirit.They've had that for years: it's called "WiFi" or "Bluetooth".
Meanwhile, my 17" MBP was easily dragged off the table by its MagSafe cable (it was due to a dog, who could be forgiven for tripping over the cable wrong) so its not going to be much use on a new ultra thin'n'light MacBook Air unless they make the magnet so weak that it also gets dislodged by a light breeze.
As for USB-C: what USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 really needs is a locking connector so that your 20 TB external hard drive array doesn't get disconnected mid-write because the cable gets yanked.
Contrive not to route cables where people are walking - its the only way to be sure.
Please don't get rid of the MagSafe, find something for the usb-c that I will end up tripping on and trashing my Mac.
Apple used to advertise safety aspect of MagSafe connector when it first introduced it. I guess now it saves a few cents profit margin to go with usb-c. Who cares if you trip on the cord and your mac crashes to the ground.
No USB-A ?! I am using that machine for work, are they kidding?
I use the USB Port to charge devices, connect my keyboard, our backup HDD etc.
What is wrong with Apple? Going to order the old model now, while it's still available
I don't think MacBook Air will have retina display.
Apple you got 5 chances. Gave up and bought a PC.
If rumors and pictures are accurate, all Apple did was add an OLED strip to the SAME OLD UNIBODY Macbook design that has been around for 8 years! In the meantime you can touch most PC laptop these days.
I mean the worst company for stealing Steve Jobs' MacBook design is Apple.
So much for a "Pro" level laptop. Losing MagSafe, HDMI, and SDCard slots. I don't care about thinness in a Pro laptop. I value functionality way over thinness and portability. My Macbook Pro 2010 is the perfect size and weight. If you want to remove the ports that a lot of people use ALL THE TIME, then do that crap with the Macbook or the Air, not the Macbook Pro. That damn headphone jack better be there too or I'm roadtripping down to Cupertino.
Agreed. If you want thinness and lightness the most, then the MacBook is what the person is looking for. If someone wants the most power then the pro is the better choice.
Who pays full price for any new Mac? Best Buy, B&H Photo, Adorama, etc, have discounts on Macs most all of the time, sometimes for a few hundred dollars off retail. I wouldn't pay full MSRP for a Mac on launch day much less when it's been over year since they've been updated and neither should anyone else.
I completely agree. The current Pro laptops are a bit too thick and bulky. I'm hoping for a slimming down with minimal port loss.Yes, but the MBP is still a laptop. It's a mobile computer, so weight and bulk matter. It should be lighter and thinner than the current model rMBP that are still pretty bulky.
If you want maximum power go desktop not mobile.
I don't see that, especially given that in all likelihood what MS is rolling out is just an AIO, where as Apple needs to roll out a lot more mac models.I think the plan is to disrupt Microsoft event by taking over tech news with this release.
They better have an event!!
Best comment in the thread hahaha
- Correctamundo. Saying "Thunderbolt 3 port" conveys the same information and all the information that's needed. Saying "USB-C port" doesn't convey that we are talking about the Thunderbolt 3 interface, hence why it should be discouraged.Thunderbolt is an interface. Its a list of commands and responses essentially, a language for hardware to use, implemented both in software and in a controller chip. It can be implemented on many types of ports, the physical port is mostly irrelevant. In the 1 and 2 iterations, it was implemented on the MiniDisplay port. In the 3 iteration, it is implemented on the USB-C port.
USB is both a port and an interface, designed together from the start. Same with DisplayPort. Thunderbolt is different in that it is just an interface.
So to be accurate: it is a USB-C port, which supports the Thunderbolt 3 interface.