i'm just getting so tired of Mac rumourmill. it's been going on now for over 6 months and still not a real peep out of Apple.
time to move on I guess
Just 6 months? I wish :-(
i'm just getting so tired of Mac rumourmill. it's been going on now for over 6 months and still not a real peep out of Apple.
time to move on I guess
Yes, but the MBP is still a laptop. It's a mobile computer, so weight and bulk matter. It should be lighter and thinner than the current model rMBP that are still pretty bulky.
If you want maximum power go desktop not mobile.
- If you have purely USB-C (such as in the 12" rMB), no there isn't. But these new MacBook Pros are rumoured to have built-in Thunderbolt 3 ports (which use the same physical USB-C port but is a different interface), so you can connect all the Thunderbolt stuff you desire.So With USB C, there is no way of connecting thunderbolt devices - there is no adapter?
Don't even bother calling it a Macbook if they get rid of magsafe, let alone calling it a pro machine.e
- If you have purely USB-C (such as in the 12" rMB), no there isn't. But these new MacBook Pros are rumoured to have built-in Thunderbolt 3 ports (which use the same physical USB-C port but is a different interface), so you can connect all the Thunderbolt stuff you desire.
If rumors and pictures are accurate, all Apple did was add an OLED strip to the SAME OLD UNIBODY Macbook design that has been around for 8 years!
In the meantime you can touch most PC laptop these days.
why can't it have both? Is it impossible or something?
2 USB C
2 USB 3
1 Magsafe
2 Thunderbolt
1 HDMI
1 SDcard
So it's both future proof and works well for the present. Why is this such a radical idea?
Or consumers could buy the laptop they really require, not want. Apple could build "Pro" laptops - a desktop replacement.
Thinner / lighter is not better - at the expense of functionality.
I'm sure for a lot of people buying a 13" MBP, a Macbook would do them just fine.
There are no adapters to connect TB 1 / 2 device to a TB3 port, right?
- Those are a lot of redundant ports. If it has Thunderbolt 3, it also has USB-C. No need to have separate USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 ports.why can't it have both? Is it impossible or something?
2 USB C
2 USB 3
1 Magsafe
2 Thunderbolt
1 HDMI
1 SDcard
So it's both future proof and works well for the present. Why is this such a radical idea?
- There definitely are. Thunderbolt 3 is of course backwards compatible with 1 and 2.There are no adapters to connect TB 1 / 2 device to a TB3 port, right?
So, TB 1 and 2 devices cannot be used with TB3?
Actually, this would be slightly awesome. Imagine them only having one line of laptops, called Macbook. All with the same design, screen quality and keyboard (which would ensure I will never buy one, but that's ok)And then I would like to see a 12" MacBook, 14" MacBook and a 16" MacBook.
Being easily portable is "functionality" in a portable computer.
What makes you think they can't make a thinner MagSafe connector?
HATE the shallow flat keyboards. Terrible. Terrible. They've created the most unrewarding soulless typing experience.
I have dreams about the ThinkPad buttery keyboards.
You could make that argument about literally any feature: "get rid of it for more battery life". Are you a professional photographer or videographer? No? Then you don't understand that having an SD card built in is a necessary pro feature, on a pro machine. If your livelihood depends on moving things off of SD cards in all kinds of environments, you're going to be a lot happier if you don't have some delicate little adapter sticking out of one of the ports at all times.And it would kill you to use a card reader? Like...seriously? If you could trade this one slot for more battery life what EVERYONE who uses a MACBOOK (Pro) as it's supposed to be used (i.e. on the go) should want.
I don't think MacBook Air will have retina display.
Why not?
Wrong. "Everybody else" does not love them. Do some looking around these very forums and look at the multitude of posts about it, many of them with lots and lots of agreement. Did you see how the very post you're responding to already has 12 people who clicked "like" on it?And everyone else loves them. Thanks for the worthless comment.
MagSafe was fun while it lasted, but I'd much prefer having a standard port that can handle everything. Ideally, the battery life will be good enough that you don't have to have it constantly charging. Now Apple just needs to give up the lightning port on the iPhone.
Wrong. "Everybody else" does not love them. Do some looking around these very forums and look at the multitude of posts about it, many of them with lots and lots of agreement. They're garbage to type on, and just because you drank the Kool Aid and think they're better becuase Apple's marketers told you so, that doesn't make it true.
$100 to connect the monitor I've been using for months?- Those are a lot of redundant ports. If it has Thunderbolt 3, it also has USB-C. No need to have separate USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
- There definitely are. Thunderbolt 3 is of course backwards compatible with 1 and 2.
Here's one such adaptor: https://www.startech.com/Cables/thu...rbolt-3-usb-c-thunderbolt-adapter~TBT3TBTADAP