I actually agree. Right now some 80-90% and dropping of the computer buying public has modest INITIAL needs serviced adequately by commodity PC's from vendors like HP, Dell, Toshiba, Lenovo and others. Those units have thin profit margins, outsourced service, and a requirement to add a variety of third party utilities and services for adequate usage. Also the hardware and software breaks down or becomes obsolete sooner.
So the cost is "distributed" over time like an Apple iPhone which is "worth" $700 but you get into it for $200 because of a monthly service contract.
When I buy a Mac (former PC user) I have hardware that lasts twice as long, software that lasts three times as long, and built in features that reduce spam, reduce upgrade labor and cost, improve simplicity of use, and simplify hardware and software upgrades, with some compromises in "process" over PC's.
Going back to the beginning, Apple who makes Macs and iPhones has "high profit margins", causing them to spend a bundle on R&D, software updates, hardware innovations, and customer service, for those plugged in to their system.
That has to be considered in the price in a rational analysis.
Rational analysis is not "popular. Price shopping is. Darwinism is phun to watch.
Rocketman