Those look like Renders not real Images..
Dude, Apple uses the Wall Street Journal to leak their stuff, and now we have images, like it or not, it's official.
Those look like Renders not real Images..
is it just me or does the black look shorter/wider then the white one??
Fragmentation is still not as bad as Android.
Why doesn't Apple just make two sizes or even three different sized phones.
What I don't understand is that everyone is assuming iOS 6 will be shown in the summer, but why would they show iOS 6 with no new iPhone. They are definetely going to want to take advantage of the screen real estate in the new OS. It all doesn't add up to me.
I can't be the only person who sees this redesign as aesthetically subpar.
Those look like Renders not real Images..
I seriously wish Steve Jobs was still around. He would have never let such a disgusting thing happen.
Those front panels are quite plainly CGI.
I remember reading an article from Gizmodo titled "Why there won't be a Verizon iPhone" or something like that. Good times.
Battery impact
But let's keep on going with this scenario and assume Apple's suppliers can secretly produce a 367ppi, 4-inch 720p 16:9 display by shredding virgin unicorn ponies and compressing them inside their secret artificial black hole. What will be the cost in terms of battery life? As with the iPad, the impact of this display in the battery life of the iPhone would be monumental, thanks to the increase in graphic power demands, pixel activation, and backlighting.
Would you be happy to switch black bars in TV series for less battery life or a thicker, heavier iPhone? I'm sure Apple wouldn't like to make that trade-off.
Fragmentation
That new screen format would also introduce fragmentation into a platform that doesn't have any right now. Zero. None. One iPhone format to rule them all will suddenly be divided and Apple will suddenly lose one of its key advantages over Android
Developers would have to rework all of their apps to work in both the new 16:9 phone and the huge installed base. There are gazillion units of iPhones 3G, 3GS, 4 and 4S out there. And their owners all keep buying new apps. A sudden change in aspect ratio will double developer costs for years to come. And, like I said before, letterboxing old apps is not a good option. They will look like crap and defeat the whole purpose.
So, for years to come, developers would have to maintain two user interface layouts, greatly increasing their costs. This is not like creating new higher resolution art to accomodate the increased density of the Retina display. That's easy. Making new layouts for all current and future applications, however, would be much more dramatic.
The iPad conflict
The iPad and the iPhone have different aspect ratios now. 4:3 vs. 3:2. That's not much of a problem, as the iPad apps have completely different layouts. It's also not a big difference. Games, which are the apps that are more similar between platformsare easily adaptable for both aspect ratios.
But, if the iPhone goes 16:9 for the sake of adopting the 720p standard, it would make sense for the iPad to go 16:9or somewhere near thattoo. If you adopt one logic to one product, you may as well adopt it for the other.
The problem is that a 16:9 iPad would be absolutely ridiculous.
Steve's golden goose
That's an idea that was repeated many times by Steve Jobs. Heand Tim Cook, for that matterexpressed his disgust with the 16:9 format one the iPad and the iPhone, saying that it doesn't make much sense from a design point of view. Except for movies, it's a format that doesn't bring much benefit. And it's actively bad for things like books and magazines.
The iPhone and the iPad, as Jobs said, happened after many years of brainstorming, planning and development. At the time, they truly believed they had found the magic formula. The market agreed and still agrees. Despite the variety of formats in the Android platform, despite the fact that big screen smartphones have found an audience, iOS keeps selling more and more, its sales increasing at a staggering rate. Even after so many years in the market, Apple's formula keeps winning.
I just had another thought;
The taller aspect ratio is 16:9 same as a wide screen tv. Maybe it has something to do with the iTV. Maybe it is somehow tied. I know it is a stretch but who knows.
Why doesn't Apple just make two sizes or even three different sized phones. Leave the current 3.5" for the ladies and make a larger 4.8" for the guys and maybe have an in-between size too. Whats the problem with Apple giving people a little choice, their mac laptops come in different sizes and so why not their phones?