Originally posted by Nicky G
Screen resolution on all models -- too high a resolution, and OS X and your apps will be pretty much unusable (unless you like squinting and/or losing your eyesight faster than you already are by being a computer geek). Much higher than they currently are, which some folks seem to be calling for, is ridiculous, and would make using the computer unpleasant. Anyone with any clue only uses LCDs in the native mode, so switching down to a lower res. would not be an option. But hey, it's the Wintel people who seem to dwell on only specs, and no kind of real-world common-sense aesthetic sense. So I guess I see what mentality is leading to their argument, even if it is silly as all heck.
I fear you speak without experience!
Until recently, I had an Apple ColorSync 20" monitor which I used only at 1600X1200 dpi. Of course, I did enlarge the fonts, but I could get a whole page of text with FrameMaker and all my pallettes on the screen with real estate to spare. The same held true for PhotoShop, Canvas, Premiere...everything. It was neither unpleasant nor stressful.
Alas, the monitor died and I replaced it with a 17" Orion FS .2 mm unit for economic reasons. It is a great monitor, but it peaks at 1280X1024. I have 30% less real estate on the screen, must keep pallettes stored until I need them, and invariably must reduce graphics and text pages to see them all at once.
I recently did some graphics for my wife--a teacher-- on the school's Dell Latitude with the 15+ inch screen at 1600X1200. The quality and crispness were amazing. With OS X and Quartz graphics, it would be unbelievable!
For the record, I am no Troll! I have owned only Apple Computers (a IIgs, PM 7100/66, PM G3 450 B/W), and I plan to buy a PB 17 when Rev B comes out. The fact remains, however, that I and many other graphics and DV users legitmiately need all the screen real estate we can get.
The technnology exists now for a high quality 1920X1200 presentation in a 17" diagonal screen. Whether you think is is necessary or not, it should be an option. Perhaps it will be in the future, when Apple/IBM no longer have to fight the absurd Ghz wars.