Well, if it's anodized aluminum, then it's not silver. The link was to a polished silver (as in 'Ag') PowerBook design.extraextra said:If it is made out of anodized aluminum, that would not be a problem? I have an iPod mini which has none of the above!
michaeldmartin said:Quad might mean dual dual core processors.
This is the funniest thing Ive read on this site to date!Jbook said:Make this the biggest fastest hottest most power hungry peice of machinery you can. Hell, I dont care if it runs on gasoline, make it a friggen beast...
azzurri000 said:I'd rather see it an inch thicker ! Ick.
Josias said:
Collin973 said:Hmm...I don't reallty wanna see a new enclosure for the mac book pro...I love the silver look to it. I definitely don't wanna see it black or white...or made out of plastic. The one thing i absolutley love about my aluminum powerbook, is the solid feel of it when i carry it around. I use to have a 17" dell laptop and it was soooo flimsy. I couldn't take it anywhere, but these aluminum laptops are rigid and tough. A plastic casing would sadden me soooo much. Keep the aluminum apple, please!!!
quietmind said:Messing with the MBP enclosure design is a bad move.
Yes. Dual Conroes are not possible. Conroes are missing the tech to be mounted in pairs on a motherboard. They must be dual Woodies, as we like to call them, to get four cores on one motherboard.Mr. DG said:Does quad therefore imply woodcrest rather than conroe?
azzurri000 said:I know cars are in a completely different boat than computers, but I think Apple should stick to its beautiful designs and only make minor changes to the models' formfactors like Porsche would do. If you've got a great thing, why completely obliterate it?
I think BLACK Anodized Aluminum would be the next logical advancement. I would find that more attractive than the current look. Black is the new IN (non) color. Just look at Steve's Turtlenecks, the success of the Black iPod and the Black MacBooks to see where the line is going.azzurri000 said:In terms of the MacBook Pro, I'd like to see how they can improve upon perfection. I'm a little nervous as to how it will look... but I guess each successive PowerBook revision looked snazzier than the one before it.
You are clearly in a deluded state as to the difference between Conroe and Woody processors - IE NONE save Dual Socket Capability in Woody and not in Conroe. You are trying to find other differences that do not exist. There is not the logic you use to justify using Woodies for anything other than Quads.sonnys said:For economies of scale, it makes sense to transition all Power Macs and XServes to Woodcrest. It makes no sense to put a Conroe into a Power Mac when they can go all Woodcrest, thereby increasing volume shipments and bringing down the overall cost for each chip. If I were Apple, I certainly wouldn't split the line with a Conroe in the low end Power Mac and Woodcrests in the higher end -- it creates a marketing dilemma that would most likely result in end user confusion.
This will also give them an opportunity to distinguish processors between the "pro" and consumer lines. What is the official name of the Woodcrest -- is it a "Core 2 Duo" brand?
ktlx said:The problem with this is that the Conroe CPU, supporting chipsets and memory are all the commodity parts and have significant cost savings over a single socket Xeon system. The Woodcrest Xeons use a lower volume chipset and FB-DIMMs compared to Conroe which should have a high volume chipset in the P965 series and use much cheaper DDR2 DIMMs. Since the Woodcrest chipset is limited to 667Mhz speeds while the Conroe P965 chipset can support 800Mhz speeds, it's even possible the Conroe could be faster than an equivalently clocked Woodcrest.
I'd be curious to see if Apple even designs and builds the motherboards any more. I'd be willing to bet Apple could create a case design that accepts either an Intel-designed Conroe or an Intel-designed Xeon motherboard. If not Intel, there are like six or seven Taiwanese motherboard manufacturers with tons of experience building Intel-based motherboards who I'm sure would design and manufacture them for Apple.
The dual dual is always going to be low volume compared to their single socket, dual core offerings, it makes no sense to punish your lower end offerings by forcing the unnecessary expense of Woodcrests and FB-DIMMs.
sonnys said:What is the official name of the Woodcrest -- is it a "Core 2 Duo" brand?
The problem with this is that the Conroe CPU, supporting chipsets and memory are all the commodity parts and have significant cost savings over a single socket Xeon system. The Woodcrest Xeons use a lower volume chipset and FB-DIMMs compared to Conroe which should have a high volume chipset in the P965 series and use much cheaper DDR2 DIMMs. Since the Woodcrest chipset is limited to 667Mhz speeds while the Conroe P965 chipset can support 800Mhz speeds, it's even possible the Conroe could be faster than an equivalently clocked Woodcrest.sonnys said:For economies of scale, it makes sense to transition all Power Macs and XServes to Woodcrest. It makes no sense to put a Conroe into a Power Mac when they can go all Woodcrest, thereby increasing volume shipments and bringing down the overall cost for each chip.
Here is a 13 month old full explanation of what FB-DIMMS are: Fully Buffered DIMM Memory. They are much more expensive than Conroe DDR2 RAM and a prime reason you will not be seeing any single processor Core 2 Duo Woodies in Apple's line but rather Conroe will perform that role.ktlx said:The problem with this is that the Conroe CPU, supporting chipsets and memory are all the commodity parts and have significant cost savings over a single socket Xeon system. The Woodcrest Xeons use a lower volume chipset and FB-DIMMs compared to Conroe which should have a high volume chipset in the P965 series and use much cheaper DDR2 DIMMs... The dual dual is always going to be low volume compared to their single socket, dual core offerings, it makes no sense to punish your lower end offerings by forcing the unnecessary expense of Woodcrests and FB-DIMMs.