Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple should have made the charger in the new Macbook a hub by adding USB and DisplayPort.
 
First comes the rMB (retina Macbook) - 12" retina screen running OSX
Next comes the riPP (retina iPad Pro) - 12" retina touch screen running iOS

No one understands that we want the riPB (retina iPad Book) - 12" retina touch screen running OSX with keyboard dock.

Only you and a few others want that, that have no idea what an abysmally awful idea that is. Apple won't do it. Ever. A touchscreen that isn't horizontal is garbage. A touchscreen that runs OSX is garbage. A touchscreen that docks with a keyboard is already here and has been since 2010, it's called the iPad. A touchscreen that docks with a keyboard and runs ios whilst not docked, and OSX whilst docked, is garbage, because it's underpowered.

Hybrids are bad ideas. They're simply a poorer version of each of the things they're combining. Luckily Apple understands this, and wouldn't dream of doing one. This was solidified with the announcement of this Macbook. If they were going to do a hybrid, this would have been it. Sorry few people that were hoping for one.

----------

If your main use for the computer was editing your RAW files, you really wouldn't go for this computer. You'd likely go for a top spec MacBook Air or a MacBook Pro. This laptop is literally built for web browsing and HD video playback, I don't think Apple are even trying to claim it would be ideal for anything else.
Precisely. Which is 98% of the world. I guess tech nerds on here all think it should be a powerhouse. Too bad they don't realize that Apple knows that the vast majority of customers do nothing more demanding than word processing and HD video playback.
 
17% larger keys = better typing accuracy. I watched the keynote and that's the conclusion of Apple's research. I think we can trust that.

Yes, there's less travel, but it's a thinner notebook. To be expected.

It doesn't work that way, unless you're constantly looking at the keyboard while you type.
 
It just dawned on me that without MagSafe, we won't be able to get a quick glance to see if the computer is still charging or fully charged. Bummer!

I guess that aspect will have to be treated like an iPad or iPhone... turning it on to check battery life.
 
Regarding the end of mag-safe... Mag-safe was great when the assumption was that your computer would be plugged in while you were using it; I think that assumption is less valid as battery life improves.

I think you're spot on here. As other posters have said, consider it's plug-in time more like an iPad than a laptop. Plug it in overnight every couple days and it stays unplugged the rest.

The biggest downside to this MacBook, imo, is the storage space but hopefully all this talk of 3D flash drive technology will do away with the problem in a couple years.
 
I think you're spot on here. As other posters have said, consider it's plug-in time more like an iPad than a laptop. Plug it in overnight every couple days and it stays unplugged the rest.

The biggest downside to this MacBook, imo, is the storage space but hopefully all this talk of 3D flash drive technology will do away with the problem in a couple years.

256GB of storage space is fine for almost anyone using this computer. If a Pro needs a computer, they should buy a MacBook Pro. If they need help making that decision, they should enlist the help of Apple support, whom will tell them that as a Pro user they may want to look into the 'Macbook Pro'.
 
Why don't you try using it before coming to any conclusions?

Ummm, because it's an internet forum??? :roll eyes: ;)

----------

Only you and a few others want that, that have no idea what an abysmally awful idea that is. Apple won't do it. Ever. A touchscreen that isn't horizontal is garbage. A touchscreen that runs OSX is garbage. A touchscreen that docks with a keyboard is already here and has been since 2010, it's called the iPad. A touchscreen that docks with a keyboard and runs ios whilst not docked, and OSX whilst docked, is garbage, because it's underpowered.

Hybrids are bad ideas. They're simply a poorer version of each of the things they're combining. Luckily Apple understands this, and wouldn't dream of doing one. This was solidified with the announcement of this Macbook. If they were going to do a hybrid, this would have been it. Sorry few people that were hoping for one.

----------


Precisely. Which is 98% of the world. I guess tech nerds on here all think it should be a powerhouse. Too bad they don't realize that Apple knows that the vast majority of customers do nothing more demanding than word processing and HD video playback.

I've used the touchscreen on my wife's Vaio Pro. For Windows programs, which truly aren't set up for a touch interface, it's if-fy or worse. If you wanted to run the Win8 "apps," it would work much better (they were designed for that). I think a touchscreen for OS X would be at very best nothing more than a gimmick.
 
Looks good in pictures but in this video it's thick especially considering it doesn't have touch or pen digitizer layers. Makes me curious what Microsoft can do with Surface Pro 4 at a higher price point when $499 gets you 1.37# and 8.7mm.
 
I get the thinness, I get the single USB port, but I don't get the weird keyboard.. it looks like a kid's netbook.

It's a full sized keyboard what's weird about it?

----------

form over function though right?

I think that whole over-priced port-limp laptop is Apple's way of convincing people that thinner isn't necessarily better, so thay can come out next keynote and say, "we made the new model a little thicker so it'll work better for you!

So you already know a computer you haven't used for one second doesn't work and is just form over function. :rolleyes:
 
256GB of storage space is fine for almost anyone using this computer. If a Pro needs a computer, they should buy a MacBook Pro. If they need help making that decision, they should enlist the help of Apple support, whom will tell them that as a Pro user they may want to look into the 'Macbook Pro'.

People are so opinionated about what others should buy. If I want the new MacBook to last me as long as my 2009 13" MBP has (still going by the way), then a larger SSD and 16GB of RAM would help with that.

"If you want that, you shouldn't buy this" shouldn't be the response. It should be "I understand your needs are unique and you have the right to want what you want" but hey, this is the interwebz.
 
People are so opinionated about what others should buy. If I want the new MacBook to last me as long as my 2009 13" MBP has (still going by the way), then a larger SSD and 16GB of RAM would help with that.

"If you want that, you shouldn't buy this" shouldn't be the response. It should be "I understand your needs are unique and you have the right to want what you want" but hey, this is the interwebz.

Um you are looking into the wrong direction in time I believe. In the past, larger storage would be very important, as would additional RAM. In the future storage is less needed due to the cloud, and 16GB of RAM?! Haha 4GB of RAM is still good for 98% of users. If you need 16GB then you don't need a Macbook, you need a MacBook Pro. You aren't going to need more RAM in the future... Why would you? MAYBE a few people doing extreme Pro work? Developers aren't using more RAM as time goes on, they're using about the same, and just doing everything more efficiently.
 
It just dawned on me that without MagSafe, we won't be able to get a quick glance to see if the computer is still charging or fully charged. Bummer!

I guess that aspect will have to be treated like an iPad or iPhone... turning it on to check battery life.

While you're right, that sucks, it's not really a big deal anyway. It's not like we could tell how much of the Macbook was charged just by looking at the magsafe. You would still have to open up the screen to check that.
 
I wonder how long it takes Apple to release a keyboard with zero key travel, and a "taptic" engine under each key?

I think it would be very interesting to try one out.
 
More than any other part of a computer, I think keyboards are a very personal choice. Apple put a lot of engineering and design work into this new, thin keyboard - that's good. It may not work for everyone - that's bad. The only way to find out is to try it for a couple of days or weeks. That's what the return period is for...
Does the keyboard on any laptop work for everyone? I don't think so.

If you put a Retina MBP in front of computer users circa 1988, they would be amazed at the capabilities of this tiny device. The screen, the computing power, the trackpad (though that would strike some as being too complicated and confusing to use). The keyboard, however would be the subject of ridicule on their bulletin board discussions. Keyboards in those days were designed to feel as much as possible like the gold standard IBM Selectric. At least three-eighths of an inch in travel, and an audible click that let you know you had really hit the key hard enough.
 
And this is when it turns on

3010135_image.jpg

3010136_image.jpg

3010137_image.jpg
 
This thing is an engineering marvel. You guys are a bunch of negative Nancy's.
 
To those saying that this is fake: if you look closely on the video at around 1:08 mark, you can see the serial number on the box. And yes, that is a valid serial number with a valid purchase date, although no product is associated with it just yet.

And exactly how are you able to come to the conclusion that both the serial number and purchase date are valid?

Also, aren't you essentially contradicting yourself by stating that it "is a valid serial number... although no product is associated with it just yet" ?
 
Does the keyboard on any laptop work for everyone? I don't think so.

If you put a Retina MBP in front of computer users circa 1988, they would be amazed at the capabilities of this tiny device. The screen, the computing power, the trackpad (though that would strike some as being too complicated and confusing to use). The keyboard, however would be the subject of ridicule on their bulletin board discussions. Keyboards in those days were designed to feel as much as possible like the gold standard IBM Selectric. At least three-eighths of an inch in travel, and an audible click that let you know you had really hit the key hard enough.

Still got an IBM Computer Keyboard the PS2 line from 1988, that thing is bombproof and is heaven to use (still works).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.