I'll point out three things:
1. http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2013/12/google-started-over-on-android-the-day-the-iphone-launched/
2. If you consider those the true pioneering smartphones, despite the fact that they never took off in terms of sales, lacked the large multi-touch screen that I not only just mentioned but are characteristic of any and every smartphone today, any resemblance in a functional desktop-class operating system, or any real ease of use at all, then I'm not going to sit here and argue with a wall. Those phones might as well be next to the definition of forgettable in the dictionary. The fact is, I think you're wrong, you're welcome to reciprocate. I couldn't care less.
3. If you can legitimately say you hate people because of their brand loyalty or preference, then out of us two, I think it's safe to say you have bigger issues than either of us do with my preference for Apple. If you mean this figuratively, then you might want to crack a thesaurus and find a lighter word to throw around. The fact of the matter is it's hypocritical for Samsung to vilify Apple for copying something they didn't originate when Samsung has pretty much built everything there phones are known for on what Apple started (see 1, or just search the entirety of the internet). That's not fanboyism, it's fact. If you don't think so (and if you actually think they copy well) then there is a judge and a multi-billion dollar settlement that says otherwise. Great artists steal, and Samsung is anything but. They have a design philosophy I just don't agree with: "Let's shoehorn the **** out of everything we can into our products so we can claim to have gotten there first, even if it's quarter-assed completely useless attempt that adds nothing our company but the ability to come up with these clever ads that in no way advertise the merit of our own hardware, but rather spend millions in air time trying to knock Apple down a peg, because why the **** not?"
I also must have missed the part where I said Apple was above anything. In fact, I'm pretty sure what I said was that Apple won't do anything because they're not going to dignify it with a response, because that **** ass excuse for an ad isn't worthy of a wet fart...but I'm you know what happens when we assume things.
Go back and look at what you said;
claiming to have originated the idea of mobile phones with screens far larger than the norm. Dignify it with a response, LOL. Typically Apple don’t do that. It’s probably little to do with dignity.
Of course that kind of thing was the original smartphone, what are you drinking? Regardless of interface, it was a device that you could do some computing browse the web/emails and make calls. Are you going to say that the first car wasn’t one because it doesn’t closley enough resemble todays models?
Microsoft make a habit of posting about flaws and security exploits. Apple don’t. Same thing, nothing to do with dignity.
It's hypocritical for Apple to vilify anybody for copying something they didn't originate most things.
We’ll agree to disagree.
Again, I‘ve a multitude of Apple products, and have bought for and converted many family members to the Mac/iOS. They like it, so do I. They are not blinded by what Apple tells them or have double standards when Appple are just as guilty. But you guys, you guys……….
Last edited: