Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If it's a traditional Windows app, chances are using it will be a much better experience with a normal mouse or proper trackpad. The fact that you can pair a bluetooth mouse to the SP is a huge plus though.
The SP type cover does have a proper track pad. Especially the latest iteration.
 
It's easier to walk than learn how to use a car. I guess cars are an inferior mode of transportation. My grandmother can't drive but she can walk. All the complicated stuff like having to put the car in gear and remembering which pedal is for go and stop doesn't exist when you're walking. You don't have to remember to buy fuel so you don't get stranded either. But you can go a lot more places with a car than with your feet. And once you learn to drive, a car is as easy as pie because someone did all the complicated engineering for you and made it as easy to use as possible.
Not easy enough! Imagine some power suit, which lets you walk as fast as a car and be strong like a bulldozer without even the need to learn how to drive or make a drivers license. That's what iPad is.

image.png

Cars aren't good enough until your little sister can walk herself to school.
 
Last edited:
Better assume it is already mentioned but currently surface computer with windows is more productive than an iPad.

However, if Microsoft moves to all windows store app approach and follow what Apple does, maybe Apple then can bash Microsoft the same way.
 
Not easy enough! Imagine some power suit, which lets you walk as fast as a car and be strong like a bulldozer without even the need to learn how to drive or make a drivers license. That's what iPad is.

And this sci-fi/marketing nonsense has exactly what to do with crap you got called out on?

You were spewing utter nonsense, I guess I finally convinced you of that, but instead of a sane response, this is what you post?

Is this the new koolaid drinker technique. When you paint yourself into too much of a corner just change the subject with something ridiculous?
 
The SP type cover does have a proper track pad. Especially the latest iteration.

I've used it. It gets the job done, sure, but it's not a trackpad like a Macbook trackpad. It's not even as good as Lenovo trackpad, and those are pretty bad. It reminds me of my old HP netbook trackpad. It technically worked, but if there was any other mouse available, I would use that instead.
 
So yes, the pen is useful for a niche segment. In the end, as a tablet first, the iPad still offers a better experience, while the SP4 has become into an ultrabook with touch with a keyboard that you have to pay extra for.
.
Microsoft says 50% of users use the pen. But I find your survey of 3 office workers far more conclusive. Still beating that SP keyboard cost extra drum when Apple is charging for the pen and its insanely cr*ppy smart cover?
[doublepost=1471398151][/doublepost]
You're not supposed to write novels in the cell of a spreadsheet. Of course it's always the entire string. That's by design!
Please check out what people do with excel sometime. Spread sheets become involved text production docs
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't Microsoft advertise the features that Surface has instead of bashing out the competition?
I think it's a fair ad, as well as classy. Hard to believe how this company seems to be changing for the better since Nadella took over.

On topic, I'd be very interested in an iPad Pro if it had some additional connectivity and ran MacOs. Until that happens, if ever, my MBP complements my iMac very well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
I own a surface 3 and I agree with this commercial 100%. It beats the iPad in every way possible. As the IT person for my company, I plan on switching out all of our ipads for surfaces soon.
I'm still amazed Apple has not come out with a full OSX tablet. :confused:

The only thing I think the iPad has going for it is the Stylus ( i refuse to call it a pencil). the pressure sensitivity of it with the ipad screen is pretty amazing and feels pretty great,( except for the ridiculous price, and lack of buttons, and stupid way of charging it) Well, maybe it's not that great after all. LOL

My surface stylus works great but I'd like to see more levels of pressure. (To be honest, they may have improved apon this with the surface Pro 4 as I haven't tried one yet.)

I think the problem here is that people are still conflating laptop=tablet.

The iPad Pro, iPad, iPhone, iPod and so forth are entertainment devices. They are not productivity devices. The iPad Pro is the closest you get to a productivity device due to the keyboard and stylus options. Software has to work without these accessories.

That said, the Surface stopped being a productivity device with the Surface Pro 3, and the Surface Pro series is both a poor "tablet" and a poor "laptop", you would only consider the Surface Pro 2 if you could not afford a Wacom Cintiq Companion. The SP3 and later threw away any advantage they had over the Wacom to be cheaper.

A "OS X" tablet would be a poor device just like the Windows "tablet" computers thus far have been. They don't do anything better than a laptop, therefor you don't buy one over a laptop. Running "full" windows applications in tablet mode is a miserable experience. The advantage OS X has, is that software is typically designed around one-button input, so making software touch-compatible isn't as much of a stretch over Windows, which all applications are designed around two-buttons, with context-menus often being on the right-mouse button.

So counter point:
I've used an iPad 3 since release as a portable SSH terminal. The place where the the iPad fails the most is the lack of the full set of keys (iPad's have no Function keys (F1-F12)) which makes trying to use command-line tools difficult with an external keyboard, and the F-keys have to be pressed through the on-screen keyboard's custom buttons.

This is why the iPad is a better tablet than the surface. Software is actually designed to work on the iPad as a tablet, and the functionality is constant. Where as Windows based tablets have no software designed for it as a tablet other than Microsoft's own apps. While it may be an advantage to run legacy Windows software on it, it's such a huge hassle to use that people wish they had bought a real laptop.

But trying to use the iPad with software not designed around the iPad's user interface (eg SSH terminals) shows you exactly what kind of miserable experience you would have if Apple released a "tablet" OS X device. Tablet devices are not for typing (productivity, programming) they are for entertainment and entertainment authoring (think Adobe Photoshop and Premiere.) An iOS device however lacks the necessary performance and disk space to be used for professional entertainment authoring. You use the iOS device for electronic news gathering in the field, now you can have a journalist everywhere and not just where you can get a news van into.
 
Oh it is religious! Very religious. There is this ideal of a "magic screen" you hold in your hand and direct manipulate with your own ten fingers. It's completely silent and light, blazing fast with incredible battery life. You don't even think about it, there is a full computer behind it? It's just you and the screen alone in the universe. Amazing how close we've come to paradise with the iPad. And then comes the devil and tells you: "But mine is better, because it has a trackpad." "PC does whaaat?" Don't you get it, tablets are great, because you don't ever need a trackpad. Never! Indirect mouse pointer movements are for losers. That's what we did in the stone age of computing, before 2010. Everyone even suggesting, Surface might be a good tablet, should burn on the stake. That is how religious this is. Witch!
Your posting way past your bedtime.
 
I would like to take this perhaps in another direction. We know that based on benchmarks, the iPad Pro is a beast of a machine. It outperforms my Late 2013 Macbook Pro. Now of course newer Macbook Pros and computers will be faster, but given the exponential performance increases, we are going to see processor speeds rivaling those from Intel.

My belief is that Apple will continue on their development trajectory and continue to refine a new model of computing. Microsoft has tried to shoehorn a desktop operating system into a tablet and every time I use my Surface Pro, it's obvious. Newer versions of the Surface recognized that it is not really a tablet and have optimized to be a laptop with the capability to be a tablet if needed. But that iPad has always been a tablet and is optimized for that.

I suspect that Apple will continue to refine this and add features to make the iPad Pro a true desktop replacement. No it will not have a USB port (well... it might go USB 3) No it won't have a mouse. No it won't run "full Photoshop", but that's not the plan. The plan is to make a great tablet computer. That mean optimizing for touch input. That means focusing on wireless technologies. That means encouraging developers to make new apps specifically designed for touch and tablet use.

I suspect that iOS 10 will have some more tricks up its sleeve which continues the march to make the desktop-class computer more and more irrelevant for more people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gudi
I think it's a fair ad, as well as classy. Hard to believe how this company seems to be changing for the better since Nadella took over.
I like the ad, I like windows, but Microsoft still has huge problems. Force updating windows 8.x users to 10.0. It cost me a lot of time and effort when my pc choked on the upgrade. Three years of power, fan and battery issues on Surface Pro 3 and 4. A myariad of surface book snarls. 2015 should have been a slam dunk for the "new" microsoft and it all looks pretty shakey, still. Hoping for the best in 2017
 
The plan is to make a great tablet computer. That mean optimizing for touch input. That means focusing on wireless technologies. That means encouraging developers to make new apps specifically designed for touch and tablet use.

I suspect that iOS 10 will have some more tricks up its sleeve which continues the march to make the desktop-class computer more and more irrelevant for more people.

I think of this as example of the utopian post pc strain that runs through MR ipad threads. If the plan were to make a great tablet computer, I think they are there. Its awesome, the pen is awesome. If the plan is to extend this to non graphics applications requiring external storage, precise pointing, 3d viewports, an exposed file finder, etc: Its not happening
 
You were spewing utter nonsense, I guess I finally convinced you of that, but instead of a sane response, this is what you post?
Dude, I don't care about Surface. If you end up running Windows the joke is on you. Just know, the iPad is how it is on purpose and there is nothing wrong with it. If you need a more capable desktop OS that's fine, but don't bring it to a tablet fight and claim you have a winner, you don't.

Surface is just another rubbish Windows PC.
 
So the selling point is that a Surface is more like computers from 15 years ago? Familiarity

Just saw on Twitter that Steve Martin was asking if a mouse was possible with an iPad. He has a BT keyboard and, I suppose, has grown tired of reaching over it to select things. In this way, the surface is more like a computer from today.
 
It IS relevant. Specially when you're using sliders or masking, or using the pen tool, etc...
[doublepost=1471361624][/doublepost]

On a 12" device? I bet you do some great "professional" work then....
Most of the engineers in my office have moved from a workstation to a surface pro 4. Doing complicated design of structures etc

Most use the Surface screen to read PDF's, looks at models on the go, do there calculations etc

And guess what? They can simply dock it in and display their programs on any screen they like....

But oh, guess we are not professional enough for you....Go draw a doodle on your little toy you while your at it.
 
But the iPad is an iPad. It was never intended to be a computer. If you need a computer get a computer.
It's ridiculous how this industry seems incapable of communicating proper category names for its products. Of course tablets, smartphones and even smartwatches are all computers, they are just not personal computers or PCs. Which also includes Macs as well as IBM-compatible Windows-PCs, of whom some are in Tablet-PC form factor, which is not the same as being a tablet. More like a hybrid between tablet and personal computer, unless you call it a 2-in-1 then it's probably both? Utter confusion!
 
iPad VS Microsoft Surface.....no competition... Surface is a COMPUTER in the traditional sense.
Ipad is for specific content creation.
 
Both the Surface and the iPad are computers. Arguing that is pretty dumb. They have a microprocessor, RAM, storage, display and input peripherals. Saying something isn't a computer because you're comparing it to the past is asinine.

Now that's being said, I think what Microsoft really is saying is that the iPad isn't a laptop. The fact is that the Surface Pro *is* a laptop with a gimmicky (but somewhat usable) tablet form factor. It's a convertible device, but it doesn't do the tablet form factor particularly well.

Likewise, the iPad is a tablet and not a laptop.

Apple should return fire and excuse the Surface Pro of not being a tablet. Poor battery life, hot, fans, heavy, few touch-optimized apps... requires a trackpad and/or stylus to use effectively. Should be a pretty easy ad to shoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M. Gustave
Most of the engineers in my office have moved from a workstation to a surface pro 4. Doing complicated design of structures etc

Do you expect people to believe that?

Are you telling me an infrastructure engineer can use a tiny 12" screen?

the bare minimum is 22", dual almost a necessity!

If they are going to use it docked, then what's the point in buying an underpowered and expensive laptop that says it's a tablet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: M. Gustave
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.