If you’re seriously asking that last question then you either did NOT read the update to the facts sourced from Bloomberg on whom is being sued. Also Apple security footage was supplied leading to this kids arrest.
If I have your birth certificate, and used it to get a license in another state (very quite possible because in the USA not even death records are fully shared state to state, nor even you drivers license (I’m unsure about drivers license); Kevin Mitnick has shown us all of that being on America’s most wants list for months before finally being arrested.
If that ID is left at the scene of a crime and an overhead camera pic or video is taken the likely accuracy of someone’s face looking similar to you is more likely vs a very accurate pic of you from your employers security pass with your face pic from less than 5ft away point blank.
If this is difficult to comprehend as a viable potential for wrongful prosecution that’s fine. But come at me reasonably not just cause you don’t like the kid wanting a billion dollars which we all think is very accessible but not completely stupid.
We’ll get to see more facts as more information is released and what level of participation Apple was in. Please read before attacking cheers
Thanks for a reply
And in the same spirit, I will ask you if you are serious.
If you would be provided with an incriminating security footage, you would investigate.
What if I would tell you that I am arresting you for finding your ID In Walmart after it was robbed?
(And you didn’t rob it)
You would provide your whereabouts to the police. They would verify. You just lost your ID. If they have some sort of footage, somebody similar to you, it is somebody similar to you but you were not there.
So, you sue Walmart for 1 billion for providing a security footage, proving theft?Any civil citizen would provide the footage, if anything was stolen on their watch, wouldn’t you?
So, again, the evidence is irrelevant to you, because you were not there and you can prove it. Still with me?
Police ignores the fact that you were not there and arrest you and make hell to you. Is that Apple store’s fault? Do they investigate themselves and frame obviously a person who was not there?
Makes 0 sense. Agree or disagree?
Now, who arrested him without proper investigation? Apple store?
ID has got a diddly squat to do with it. If he had a proof he was not there, then POLICE seriously screwed up, not Apple store (providing they didn’t falsify the footage)
With your logic, all the people who were mistakenly identified by police, should sue the places that provides security footages. Basically, police screws up and company (which may have been robbed) gets sued on top of it. Very nice