They were recorded before Apple made the price cuts to the MBPs. And MS has since updated the as, and created some new ones. (The one with Matt, Jamey, ad Olivia (I think) is just sad: "And the ability to share pictures." WTF?)
And yes, it does show great weakness when you ask a competitor to stop running ads. It shows monumental weakness to ask a competitor to stop running ads, then do nothing special to counter.
Mate, they compared a professional line to a consumer line of laptops. Its so stupid I might as well say that my MacBook is cheaper and better value for money when compared to a Dell Precision Mobile Laptop.
Microsoft went out of their way to choose something Apple doesn't sell and then compare it to an Apple product which isn't even in the same market segment!
I mean, sure, talk about variety, talk about the fact that there is a huge range but to compare it to a niche player of 10% really shows Microsoft's insecurity. For Christ sake, Microsoft has 90% of the market, what more they do they want?
FWIW, I am not a graphic artist, nor do I live (or work) in a glass house, yet I much prefer a matte screen.It's perfectly understandable, but the way the "anti-Gloss" brigade go on, and on, and on, and on, and on about the issue is more annoying than rusted sandpaper to the scrotum.
We get it, but the fact remains that unless you're a graphic designer or someone who lives in a glass house, the Gloss screen isn't an issue.
Having used matte screens on the G5 and first Intel iMac's, I couldn't go back now I've used the Gloss display. Yes, that may only be my opinion, but as I said it's more the way that people jump on the bandwagon and moan every, single time a Mac refresh is mentioned.
The hysteria in here at times is painful to read ... there's excitement, and then there's blind, morbid, zealousness.
I love the idea, although I am trying to imagine how exactly Apple could implement the tilting screen in a usable way, other than just being able to remove the screen and put it on a flat surface.Touch screen computers have no use as long as they are mounted VERTICALLY (resulting in a gorilla arm...), but why should Apple not equip their new iMacs with a cool new kind of hinge that allows you to swipe the machine into a stable, HORIZONTAL position. When flipping the machine, it will automatically invoke a kind of TouchFinder (similar to FrontRow), an overlay to the real Finder that has been optimised for touchscreen use (larger buttons, etc.)! Imagine sorting your images in iPhoto touch on that gorgeous 24" screen laying almost flat on your desktop! Imagine cropping a video in iMovie touch! And surfing the internet using Safari touch for the new iMac with onscreen overlay keyboard. And if you want to go back to regular use (egg. to write a paper), you just flip the machine into a vertical position again and you will be back in the regular Finder and are using your keyboard and mouse (that were just hidden by the machine in it's horizontal position).
Now, wouldn't that be genious? Toss in BlueRay and -- boom! A killer machine!!
The PowerBook G5?As for the cooling issue....when were you never pleasantly surprised by Apples innovations of making things possible?![]()
The two features:
1. Matte screen option
2. Ability to use iMac as external monitor. Preferably via hdmi, but probably some proprietary crap.
Since everyone expects bluray I fully expect it to not be there.
Going out on a limb I would say eventually a redesign to make it look like a big iPhone on a stand.
We all know apple hates full size keyboards
That AND, they REALLY REALLY REALLY NEED TO MAKE THE IMAC WIDESCREEN!!!
Blu-ray is possible too.
Why don't one of you pro matte screen people start an online petition??? If you make enough noise Apple will listen!![]()
2. Ability to use iMac as external monitor.
Since everyone expects bluray I fully expect it to not be there.
Give me something as revolutionary to the Macs as the iPhone was to the telephones and i'm happy.
Microsoft went out of their way to choose something Apple doesn't sell and then compare it to an Apple product which isn't even in the same market segment!
For Christ sake, Microsoft has 90% of the market, what more they do they want?
FWIW, I am not a graphic artist, nor do I live (or work) in a glass house, yet I much prefer a matte screen.
I understand that you feel different and that is okay.
Please understand some of us would really prefer a matte display over a glossy display just because we like matte. That's it. Simple when you think about it.
Bottom line, it's called choice. Some prefer glossy. Some prefer matte. It would be wonderful if Apple provided customers the choice to choose the type of the display that they want.
I keep trying to preach this to the "long live downloads!" faithful, but they don't get it. The average HD movie sold on iTunes takes up about 4 GB of disk space at 720p. The movies are maybe $5 cheaper than a Blu-ray Disc version, which has 1080p uncompressed with a bitchin' load of quality audio formats (Dolby Digital is NOT high-tech anymore), a lot of good/bad extra features, and the durability of a disc.
If you like downloading movies, fine. But don't try to push that discs are a dead format. The iTunes Music Store just became the top music seller LAST YEAR. I buy almost all music online, but I'm not stupid enough to suggest that CDs are dying. We occasionally do a music swap at work in which we put 15 or so songs on a CD and rotate them around every week. Most of us have an iPod of some sort, but we can't do anything like that.
Digital downloads and optical media are probably going to co-exist for a LONG while. If Apple were to add BD to new Macs, I'd be backing up my music library and photo library on a BD pretty darn quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by psingh01
2. Ability to use iMac as external monitor.
You can do that now.
Using the iMac as an external monitor?
How?
I know earlier iMacs you could, but they haven't had that built in ability for quite a while...
A quick question, do the people who dislike the Gloss iMac displays also have issues with their iPhone screens? They're pretty much identical, but the iPhone is more prone to reflection problems due to it being outside more.
Personally, as I said, I think HD video, photos (viewing good quality ones, not actually working on them), and just everything in general has a lovely sharpness and richness to it with the Glossy display.
Software makes it possible today, but not in the same good way it would be with a dvi-in or hdmi-in port.
Are you sure about this?I know earlier iMacs you could, but they haven't had that built in ability for quite a while...
The certain iMac G3s had VGA ports on them. I can't seem to confirm that they would accept input though. I've heard mentions of it though.Are you sure about this?
If so, which models?
TIA.
Nothing more. No nonsense Blu-ray, no radical case change, maybe not even LED screens.
As for aesthetics, my rig is, I think rather good looking and quite functional with it's hotswap HDD bays.