Darn straight Apple knew about the issue with the antenna. I don't buy that they wanted in on the case market. They were preparing ahead of time to solve their design flaw.
Ok, it came off to me like you were suggesting they keep refreshing this particular model. We're probably on the same page but just saying it differently.I agree. That's why the one in January would not be iPhone 5. It would essentially be 4.5 (or "1" of a different model).
YES!! There are many of us you would live a 240 or 300 GB pod. Some want entire libraries on the road or at a different location (DJs, stores. galleries, restaurants, etc).
Bring it on!!
So does Apple have to always wait one year between iPhone releases? What about the people who didn't get the iPhone 4 and want a new phone in February. Should their only option be a phone that is 8 months old and about to be replaced?
Your original point was that it makes sense to refresh the iPhone more frequently to keep up with all of the hardware the Android OS is on. That point is valid, I just disagree with it (and Apple or any manufacturer would, too). Putting iOS on a different, UNIQUE line of hardware that has its own cycles makes more sense if you want to keep something new coming out more frequenltly.
If you want a real world example, how about Macbook and Macbook Pro? Different lines of hardware, same OS, yearly refreshes, similar functions.
There are too many iPad versions out there now (6 models)
We don't need any more.
It may be just you. Most of the comments here are as usual, useless and pointless. Such as mine right here. Many more Apple haters post here than anywhere. Guess there just aren't enough Android forums for them.Is it just me, or does everyone find the comments to these stories far more insightful than the crap article?![]()
And I thought I had a big library. 41.5 days of music in just over 80GB of space, not counting movies, music videos, television and other media. Do I really want to try to fit all that onto a single device? No battery in existence could play it all without recharging.
Wow. That would be a huge middle finger to the people who just bought an iPhone. I know technology evolves quickly, but 6 months?! That's just ridiculous.
Welcome to the rest of the industry. Apple has been quite slow to update the iPhone (once per year, so far). The top-of-the-line Android phones shift every other month. Since the Droid, we've had the Nexus One, Droid Incredible, EVO 4G, Droid X, Galaxy S each come out, one-upping the phone that came out before it. If you're waiting for the phone that will be the best for a long time, you'll never actually buy a phone. Just enjoy what you have right now and upgrade when you can't bare it anymore. Besides, is your iPhone 4 really going to feel that sluggish by January?
Ok, what I'm getting at is if Apple goes a route of multiple phone releases in a year, they'd be different lines of devices separate from the iPhone. It would be poor marketing alone to go from iPhone 4 to 5 to 6 within a year. If they're putting out iOS on more than one phone release, the hardware should be very different and on unique cycles; like Motorola is doing.
Apple will lose credibility if they renew the same line every 6 months, especially if they promote themselves as being the BMW of the computer world. People will not accept paying a premium price and having an outdated product in just 6 month. They would accept this with an Acer but not with an Apple
Though the result will be they'll have a harder time competing spec-wise