Nope, if the resolution does change it'll have to be 2048x1536; anything other than that can't be scaled like is done on the iPhone 4, which means developers would need to support two different resolutions for iPad which is messy and very unlike Apple.What about 50% higher resolution? That's 1536 x 1152. As long as both width and height are increased the same... it wouldn't be a problem updating the apps from iPad 1 to 2 right?
"Retina display" is 80% marketing and 20% actual technology as is evident in the difference in the displays on iPhone and iPod touch. Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about. Do some more research.
Nope, if the resolution does change it'll have to be 2048x1536; anything other than that can't be scaled like is done on the iPhone 4, which means developers would need to support two different resolutions for iPad which is messy and very unlike Apple.
I don't quite agree. As long as height and width are increased proportionally it doesn't matter if it's 50% or 100% scaling. And why does it have to be like the iPhone 4? This is iPad.
Take playing back video on a computer for instance. One can scale it in different sizes. Should be the same thing with apps.
If the resolution is anything but an increment of its original resolution when scaling graphic issues will be encountered.I don't quite agree. As long as height and width are increased proportionally it doesn't matter if it's 50% or 100% scaling. And why does it have to be like the iPhone 4? This is iPad.
Take playing back video on a computer for instance. One can scale it in different sizes. Should be the same thing with apps.
plz stop calling it the Retina display, its beginning to be sort of a bother to me. as said before by someone, retina means nothing. it's like a Pentium or Centrino. its a name. Retina is no more than a gimmick from apple describing that it looks vibrant and alive on our retinas. only reason ipod touch has it is that its pretty much the same screen.
no you wont ever see a touchscreen osx devise .see keynoteYou will absolutely see a touchscreen Mac OS device at some point. It just won't be in 2011.
I don't quite agree. As long as height and width are increased proportionally it doesn't matter if it's 50% or 100% scaling. And why does it have to be like the iPhone 4? This is iPad.
Take playing back video on a computer for instance. One can scale it in different sizes. Should be the same thing with apps.
no you wont ever see a touchscreen osx devise .see keynote
steve jobs said himself that they are hard to use and uncomfortable.
Tbh i dont expect to see a new ipad in 2011 as apple's last release suggests "back to the mac" so i'd hold off on all of this.
iPhoneCollector said:no you wont ever see a touchscreen osx devise .see keynotepoloponies said:You will absolutely see a touchscreen Mac OS device at some point. It just won't be in 2011.
steve jobs said himself that they are hard to use and uncomfortable.
plz stop calling it the Retina display, its beginning to be sort of a bother to me. as said before by someone, retina means nothing. it's like a Pentium or Centrino. its a name. Retina is no more than a gimmick from apple describing that it looks vibrant and alive on our retinas. only reason ipod touch has it is that its pretty much the same screen.