Next iPhone Will Reportedly Have "Global [4G] LTE Support"

What good was the 4G when it sucked the battery life of the phones so badly people were tied to their chargers like umbilical cords.
Yep, great feature.

That reminds me of Ali G's solution to mobile phones always running out of power: a mobile phone that...wait for it...is permanently plugged in to a wall socket. Why hasn't it been invented yet.
 
Being that the new iPad has it, I'm not sure why they would not incorporate it. I won't be paying for the service though, unless my carrier drastically reduces the price that they are currently offering. If they do, I will gladly utilize it.
 
I agree with Absent ;)

To elaborate:

P = V x I
Power (measured in Watts) = Voltage (measured in Volts) x Current represented by the letter I (measured in Amperes (or just Amps))

So the new battery's capacity is 5.45Wh (Watt hours). The battery should therefore be able to sustain a power draw of 5.45W for a period of 1 hour, or a power draw of 1W of 5.45 hours, or any calculation that results in a total 5.45Wh (within the reasonable limits of real-world possibilities eg. the battery probably wouldn't be able to sustain a draw of 100W over 0.0545 hours (3 min 16sec) because the battery would very much likely MELT!!!)

Anywho, all you really need to know is that in increase in battery capacity of 0.15Wh is not much by any means (2.83%!!!) and is probably not even good enough to satisfy a reasonable expectation of year-on-year technology advancments in battery technology! I'm not an expert, but the increase in capacity will almost certainly be eaten up well and truly by the increased screen size's power draw, not to mention LTE's apparent hunger for power!!! (even if there is a newer LTE chip in place).

I agree with what you've said, in terms of the overall entire hypothese.
However, there are a few other things to consider.
(1) technology tends to advance year on. components tend to be more efficient now than before. Lower consumption - meaning the same battery capacity would last a bit longer with later components. [and lower consumption over extended time period, can increase the amount of power u can discharge from a battery (see note 3)]
(2) higher voltage(although not very high, case-in-point rumored iphone5 battery label) could also plays a part. (i would assume that apple would have thought it out such that it might run on a slightly higher voltage? with less conversions,etc. and perhaps incur less loss? - well it's all hypothetical)
(3) the battery draw with time that u mentioned earlier, varies. it's not fixed.
usual the figure given are in terms of longer time discharge with lower current.
meaning, the more amps u drain out in lesser time, the lower the power that can be discharged - despite saying it is a 5.45Wh. so in a way, draining out less amperage over extended period(with a slightly higher voltage) could sustain better battery life.

anyway, to me these figures are quite small, like u mentioned earlier.
undeniably though, like u have said too, it would be quite true that the lte component might be a huge power draw. perhaps (maybe) the component power draw with the other communication modules, might have equalized in the end.

im just hoping the label on the battery was just for show. and the new iphone would last way longer than 5hrs.
 
Telstra

Will this new world iPhone work on Telstra's 4g network in Australia or will we miss out again like with the iPad. I'm just wondering if Telstra decided to use some weird sort of 4g that no one else in the rest of the world is going to use.
 
Again we have to debate about phone compatibility with other providers!

Top 3 U.S service providers to hate, Cable(TV)/Internet provider, and
Wireless Cell Phone provider.

They are just eating away your arms and legs each passing day (AT&T, Verizon...), while the rest of the world gets better. What's sad is that, even the third world country underdeveloped ones provides sim-swapping possible to any provider of your choice, better plan, lower rate, free incoming call/text and of course contract free.
 
Last edited:
Its funny how LTE matters now, despite Android having it for a year and a half.

Kinda like some android phones allready have nfc. Its like those makers are just checking off some spec sheet, not caring wether anyone will actually take advantage of the tech nor if it will drain your battery. I still kinda think Apple are early adaptors. LTE is still not availiable a lot of places.
 
Last edited:
Off topic but...

I personally know two people who have the new Galaxy S III and they are having trouble with them. The serious kind of trouble. Reboot frequently. Makes me wonder if this is a problem with many others.
 
I personally know two people who have the new Galaxy S III and they are having trouble with them. The serious kind of trouble. Reboot frequently. Makes me wonder if this is a problem with many others.
Nope.....works perfect, to get BOT has no LTE and the real life battery life for me is two to three days.
 
sigh... not w/ the same power consumption. I like LTE, just don't love how much battery it sucks out of the current devices. Android LTE phones are like buying a car that can run really fast, but you have to stop every 1/4 mile to fill it up w/ gas.

What's that Besoz said the other days? Oh.. Consumers are smart (because they didn't buy Android tablets) LOL.
 
Vodafone havn't bought any 800Mhz/2.6GHzLTE bandwith as yet, they will have to bid for it with a number of other carriers, (presumably once various legalities are sorted with OFCOM, as they might challenge Everything Everywhere's LTE green light), but im sure one of those frequencies will be compatible with it. Trouble is no-one actually knows what chip is in the phone, regardless it should be ok.

Everything Everywhere will be launching 1800MHz LTE shortly, apparently right before the speculated iP5 launch, they probably already know if its compatible, hence the rush to get it out in time.

For the record, im glad EE got the go ahead, i probably wouldnt switch to them just for that service, but it will make Vodafone and O2 pull their bloody finger out. Its shocking the Government, OFCOM and carriers have lagged so far behind.

What's so shocking about it? I easily get 5+ Mbps on O2 3G. I know this isn't as fast as '4G' etc, but really- it's plenty fast for a phone, even when I use it for tethering (smooth iplayer streaming etc). 4G would be 'nice' but normal consumers won't notice any difference between 3G and 4G in day to day use.
 
Tim Cook at the keynote:

"Since everyone knows about the next iPhone because of the leaks and the internet, we dont need to tell you anything except that it will be available worldwide in 30 days. So now we have more time to talk about Macs :)"
 
sigh... not w/ the same power consumption. I like LTE, just don't love how much battery it sucks out of the current devices. Android LTE phones are like buying a car that can run really fast, but you have to stop every 1/4 mile to fill it up w/ gas.

Sounds very American to me.

By the way, you don't know yet how the next iPhone will fare, you're only giving it credit. Let's see if it deserves it. In the meantime, everybody is free to buy Apple's next year's technology today from the competition.
 
I´m seriously interested in understanding the need for LTE on a smartphone...
Can someone explain this to me? I understand the benefits if you want to replace your existing ADSL broadband or even cable broadband (Not fibre) with a mobile broadband that delivers higher speeds. But not entirely...I´ll explain why later...

What I do not understand is the need for the speed on a smartphone. <snip>

What do you guys think?

Because some people like streaming content on a very small screen :confused:

No, really we should just admit the truth. We're geeks. Speed for its own sake, even without a purpose, is just cool. :cool:

Res ipsa locquitor.

.
 
Interesting. And witch Android Phone or Tablet suports global LTE at the moment?

Here in Japan there are quite a few phones that support it. I'm not sure if it's popular at all, but it's widely available. If it were cheap enough, I'd get it too.
 
Sounds very American to me.

By the way, you don't know yet how the next iPhone will fare, you're only giving it credit. Let's see if it deserves it. In the meantime, everybody is free to buy Apple's next year's technology today from the competition.

Also for you the question, where is a Android Phone or tablet that works globally? Where can I buy next years tech today?

----------

Here in Japan there are quite a few phones that support it. I'm not sure if it's popular at all, but it's widely available. If it were cheap enough, I'd get it too.

Could you quote just one model? A phone that will work with LTE in Japan, Europe, Asia and the US? I can not find any, Google failed as well. But if they are widely available, there should be at least one model?

Also, it should make phonecalls possible. In Germany for instance they have a HTC Android phone with LTE (of course, it only works on one network and not outside Germany) but it can not make phonecalls. Not really practical for a PHONE.
 
What's so shocking about it? I easily get 5+ Mbps on O2 3G. I know this isn't as fast as '4G' etc, but really- it's plenty fast for a phone, even when I use it for tethering (smooth iplayer streaming etc). 4G would be 'nice' but normal consumers won't notice any difference between 3G and 4G in day to day use.
You are so right. In the states, LTE is a must, but only there. Nobody in the rest of the world could care less.
Two weeks ago I was in Germany, they demoed a HTC LTE phone. Can not even make a call, as LTE is not yet prepared for voice. So, to make a call, it falls back to 3G, of course leaving the 4G running and that results in battery life below 5h (promised) so in reality around 3h.
Speeds of nearly 50Mbs where shown as long as the phone was in the headquarters of Vodafone in Germany, next to the transmitter and the only phone in the cell. Vodafone promises "up to" 20Mbs in practice, at least until more the a dozen people use the network. It is notreally for phones or tablets but for rural areas that should get fast internet conections.

Here in Barcelona I tested my iPad3 on the local 3G Network from Movistar and average 17.5 Mbs down and 4Mbs up. If I go up the coast to the north, that falls back to around 10Mbs down and 2 Mbts up. While using the device, there is no difference in the experience at all. One seriously must ask, what this LTE is good for. The money spend could have been used to improve the existing, working, tried and tested 3G Network.
 
Just heard from a family member working on uk lte that the iphone will def have lte and will be launching on everything everywhere
 
This shouldn't be a surprise to many of us as we all were expecting LTE on this years iPhone. If it were to not have LTE, that would be a big shock with many upset people no doubt.

If that's all they can come up with, Apple customers will be up for a huge disappointment - after all, LTE is just a marginal improvement over current 3G speeds, has very limited availability around the world and will remain as such for years to come. Moreover, this is not even a phone feature; it's just a network-related evolution available to all makers out there.

In my view, anything LESS than haptic-feedback screens, innovative content management framework and more storage in the iPhone 5 will constitute a pathetic downer.
 
sigh... not w/ the same power consumption. I like LTE, just don't love how much battery it sucks out of the current devices. Android LTE phones are like buying a car that can run really fast, but you have to stop every 1/4 mile to fill it up w/ gas.

Have you owned any Android LTE devices? You can't just bunch them all together and generalize. The HTC One X on AT&T get's phenomenal battery life (better than the current 4S under real world use).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top