Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sounds good...lets get the kingsize one! You can never go wrong with chocolate........or bacon.....

Or even better....chocolate AND bacon!!
 

Attachments

  • Chocolate_covered_bacon.JPG
    Chocolate_covered_bacon.JPG
    217.7 KB · Views: 109
That is awesome! :)

Yes, the two foods that make everything better...put them together and it's like a flavor explosion!!

Sorry, can't resist...(and now back to our regularly scheduled programming).
 

Attachments

  • img_LjFAHq.jpg
    img_LjFAHq.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 261
What is so crazy is look at all he has argued about.

First it was the back button not functioning property. More of it not functioning like he wants it to. Google seems to have it functioning just like they want. Again he was told this over and over, and still never got it.
I laid out the logical problems of the back button that no one has been able to refute. It is inconsistent and doesn't always take you back despite what Google says. Simple fact. We disagree, get over it.

Then he started arguing with me about the Nexus line through PMs. He has only owned the N4, but he tried to tell me I was wrong, but he had no proof.
Tell you that you were wrong about what? About how you think the Nexus 4 is perfect and has no flaws? Yes, you are wrong. Stop being vague to make me look like the bad guy.

Then he wanted to argue about N5 battery life. Speculating that it would be one of the screw ups on the N5. I told him to look at the HTC One, and it's battery. His response was to say the screen is going to be bigger on the N5. Wait isn't the HTC One 4.7, and the N5 4.9? Is that really that much bigger?
You really don't understand anything. And you clearly missed what I said earlier:
I never said we know exactly what battery life will be. I am only using what available information we have to get a general idea. Never said anything concrete about battery life, never said it will for sure be this, that, or anything else. Just all speculation. If you are saying I did anything else than take available information and past devices as evidence to create a theory, then you are forcing your own assumptions on my speculation. But it is nothing more than that, speculation. And speculation based on Google's history, past devices, and available information is more than nothing. Speculating can also be enjoyable.


And now he is arguing Siri is better. Claims because you can hit the home button to access it. It makes it easier to use, and more functional. The fact that it can't pick up what you are saying a lot of the time makes it kind of useless. Sure in theory you should be able to send a text while driving because you would not have to look, but every time I did it. Siri got a few words wrong, and I did have go look at the phone.
Where did I say that in all circumstances Siri is better? Or are you just making stuff up again? Ya, thats what I thought.

And guess what, you can't even understand the argument. The argument is that it is easier to hit a physical button than to hit a button on a touch screen without looking.

To me it seems like he is an Apple guy just trolling the thread. Trying to point out everything Google is going wrong.
Yes. I am an Apple troll. That is why I sold my 12-core Mac Pro to build a Windows workstation. That is why I sold my iPhone 4S after I got my Nexus 4. That is why I sold my iPad 3 after getting a Nexus 7. Oh wait...

Ya, you have no idea what you are talking about. You have been making crap up this whole time trying to make me look bad just because you don't understand what is being discussed.

...without knowing exactly what we were discussing
Heck, you don't even know what we are discussing!

With eyes closed, a physical home button is easier to hit than a button on a touchscreen. It is that simple.

Check out this video on PocketNow. But yes you can dictate emails and texts handsfree....
http://pocketnow.com/2013/08/23/touchless-control-on-moto-x
We never argued whether or not you can dictate emails with your voice. The question is sending them.

You are required to have touch input for sending emails, texts, creating calendar events, setting reminds, and more. You are a waste of my time until you show me a video of you doing all of the above on a Moto X without ever touching the screen.

Heh, Jamerz is to touchless controls as Straus is to the Android back button.

:p
At least I laid out a logical statement no one up to this point has been able to refute.

----------

Speaking of which. Where is he today? I have not had to avoid one post today from him.

I was getting my beauty sleep ;)
 
Sorry everyone. I will keep my thoughts to myself next time.:(

you had to rattle the monkey's cage! :)

----------

Free chocolate+Bacon with every Android phone would have had even the most diehard apple fans converting :p
For marketing sakes....you would think there would be some kind of gimmick or contest involving free KitKat bars of some kind......
 
you had to rattle the monkey's cage! :)

----------


For marketing sakes....you would think there would be some kind of gimmick or contest involving free KitKat bars of some kind......

Yes I did, and I am very sorry for that. Hopefully if we just ignore the post he will stop.
 
What's this talk about Androids back button? I've never had any issues.

It was something Strausd did not understand, and couch had to explain it to him about 100 times. To sum it up. He wanted the back button to take him back to last app he used. So if he was in chrome and went I to tapatalk. When he hit back he wanted it to take him to chrome again not the home screen. He claimed that is did not do what it was suppose to because it did not do that.
 
What's this talk about Androids back button? I've never had any issues.

It was something Strausd did not understand, and couch had to explain it to him about 100 times. To sum it up. He wanted the back button to take him back to last app he used. So if he was in chrome and went I to tapatalk. When he hit back he wanted it to take him to chrome again not the home screen.

Since people keep bringing it up, let me just post the most relevant posts.

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/18066291/

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/18066340/

He claimed that is did not do what it was suppose to because it did not do that.
The biggest issue is just that it is inconsistent. And couch even said it is there for developers to make it consistent.

Don't disagree.

The back button is there for the developers to make consistent.

But guess what, if you have various different developers using the same thing, it will work various different ways. Simple fact.
 
So back on track. Are we looking at a October 28th or the 31st for the announcement? Which do you guys see as more believable?
 
Haha maybe you shouldn't boss people around and let people read what they want to read.

Hmm, I kind of like how Android back button works. If I'm in an app it will put me backwards inside that same app until I get to the first screen, then if I hit it again it brings me to the previous app I was in. It's quite logical IMO, if you want to use it, you don't have to though. Nothing wrong with how iOS does it at all, but you still have to close the app, or go to the app manager to switch to the last program. Android kind of streamlines it if you are going between apps.
 
Hmm, I kind of like how Android back button works. If I'm in an app it will put me backwards inside that same app until I get to the first screen, then if I hit it again it brings me to the previous app I was in. It's quite logical IMO, if you want to use it, you don't have to though. Nothing wrong with how iOS does it at all, but you still have to close the app, or go to the app manager to switch to the last program. Android kind of streamlines it if you are going between apps.

The thing is it doesn't always take you back to your last screen.

----------

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Android-4.4-KitKat-website-will-have-a-countdown-timer_id48360
 
Hmm, I kind of like how Android back button works. If I'm in an app it will put me backwards inside that same app until I get to the first screen, then if I hit it again it brings me to the previous app I was in. It's quite logical IMO, if you want to use it, you don't have to though. Nothing wrong with how iOS does it at all, but you still have to close the app, or go to the app manager to switch to the last program. Android kind of streamlines it if you are going between apps.

I've since thought of and tested more examples of how the back button does work perfectly fine, but I won't get into it.

What Straus wanted -- where the back button returned to whatever was the previous screen no matter what, even if it was a separate app -- would also put us in an infinite loop. Pointing this out should have been the end of the conversation. So even if the current implementation of the back button is, once in a rare while, funky, Straus' idea for the back button would have truly been bizarre, regardless of his [false or inapplicable] analogy he kept bringing up about traveling to and from highways.

----------

The thing is it doesn't always take you back to your last screen.

----------

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Android-4.4-KitKat-website-will-have-a-countdown-timer_id48360

Here we go again. Heh.

Straus, you should be glad it doesn't. Taking you back to the last screen, no matter what, would put you in an infinite loop. I gave you many examples of this. How do you reconcile that in your Android-world where the back button does that? I really don't get it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.