Its certainly not an amazing spec sheet. For example, the camera is clearly worse than the SGS II, the processor is, at best, on par. This shoots 720p, so do most of the high end Droids, some even do 1080, like the 4s. The screen size is increased, but thats about it. Other than ICS there is nothing here over an SGS II. Arguably the SGS II with ICS is a better buy.
I've had an SGS II and I did like it a lot, really slim and light with a great vivid screen. Unfortunately I like my iPhone 4 more, so I sold it and went back, mainly for the keyboard, Camera, Apps and Sycing with iTunes. The larger screen did not make that much of a difference, but I struggled to use it one handed. I think at 4.5" this is a phone which has to be operated with two hands.
What we are seeing with Android is manufacturers trying to differentiate their products using things like screen size - things wich can be easily seen on a phone store display or spec sheet. Bigger/larger numbers are always better, right? Personally I didn't notice much difference in useable area going back to the iPhone 4. I dont think Android manufacturers have figured out how to best use the extra space.
I've had an SGS II and I did like it a lot, really slim and light with a great vivid screen. Unfortunately I like my iPhone 4 more, so I sold it and went back, mainly for the keyboard, Camera, Apps and Sycing with iTunes. The larger screen did not make that much of a difference, but I struggled to use it one handed. I think at 4.5" this is a phone which has to be operated with two hands.
What we are seeing with Android is manufacturers trying to differentiate their products using things like screen size - things wich can be easily seen on a phone store display or spec sheet. Bigger/larger numbers are always better, right? Personally I didn't notice much difference in useable area going back to the iPhone 4. I dont think Android manufacturers have figured out how to best use the extra space.