Yes correct, and you'd be on the money if the people who slammed it are now praising it. They're not![]()
In this same thread the are a lot of people slamming NFC and praising Apple still unofficial implementation.
Yes correct, and you'd be on the money if the people who slammed it are now praising it. They're not![]()
Let's give some current examples, please.
iOS 8 is still not out - too easy to say it's going to be better with the next version. The next version is always better.
In this same thread the are a lot of people slamming NFC and praising Apple still unofficial implementation.
Yeah I know. It's not the same person slamming it and then praising it. That's my point.
Or are you just pointing out that different people have different opinions? If so, then yes you're correct. Just not sure why that needs to be pointed out...
Perhaps my English is bad, the same persons are slamming NFC prior to Apple and praising Apple implementation.
Now it is more clear? So no, it is not your point, the point is that the same person slams a technology until his beloved company implements it being that company Apple, Google or name the company you want.
Perhaps my English is bad, the same persons are slamming NFC prior to Apple and praising Apple implementation.
Now it is more clear? So no, it is not your point, the point is that the same person slams a technology until his beloved company implements it being that company Apple, Google or name the company you want.
If I put garlic on my chocolate pudding, it is likely going to taste like crap. If I put garlic in my pasta, it's possibly going to be great. So do I have a double standard when it comes to garlic?
I guess if I describe how great that garlic tasted on my pasta, you will reply: "pwwaaahahahahahahaahahahahah" or something equally intelligent.
NFC on phones so far has been useless. It will still be useless on Sep 10, no matter what Apple does on Sep 9. If Apple implements NFC in the same way as other phone vendors, then also their implementation will be useless. But if Apple does what I described above - which is different from what all other phone vendors have done so far - then it will be useful. But according to some people, preferring useful applications of a feature over useless ones is a double standard. So be it.
Wired's sources didn't not reveal how the system would work, but the publication was told that near field communications (NFC) technology will be part of the system.
I find it hilarious how people on this forum are getting all excited for NFC when they use to bash samsung and other android phone makers for implementing. But now that apple is doing it is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I think the only reason NFC payment system wasn't available widespread in the US is because iphone is more popular her than in Europe and Asia. Hopefully if this is true we will see more NFC implementations in the states.
NFC is very useful. People are seriously underestimating it.
NFC is not very useful right now in it's current implementation.
NFC is not very useful right now in it's current implementation. Hopefully Apple will change that. I'm sure you will disagree and state some random example that a handful of people me utilize in their day to day activities but that doesn't change the fact.
Why it is not very useful?
Nobody gives a damn about passbook because it is based mainly for USA consumers.
Nobody will give a damn if the same happens for NFC payments. Worldwide rollout from day one required if they want this to work.
Of course the blank look may have been because you said you were buying 'petrol'...
Why is it useful?
Apart from payments, using it in public transportation, configure Wifi networks, pair BT speakers, lock/unlock doors, communicate with other smartphones?
Not much