People balk at the wage of 1.27/hour, but they forget that it is cheaper to purchase things too. When is the last time you paid 0.70 for a full lunch?
That's 55% of one hours wage for a meal. To put that in North American perspective, its the same as someone who earns $13/hour paying $7.15 for their lunch.
Suddenly doesn't seem so shocking now, does it?
Your point is good, but you misread the reported wage. The reported wage was 1.78 per hour. So the meal is 39% of an hourly wage. So it is really like a worker here who earns $18.33 per hour and pays $7.15 for their lunch. All this just further supports your point though.
Basically, your average American high school graduate probably is less secure in their ability to pay for food and housing and save for retirement than these Foxconn workers.