I got the 16GB Plus. I honestly don't use that many apps, and over the years I've gotten into the habit of keeping my messages purged and pointless photos to a minimum.. Oh yeah & I use Spotify as well for music
What rate do the subsidized phones pay per line versus the NEXT'd phones?
The final amount you pay for the phone actually works out to relatively the same amount at the conclusion of your two month contract.
It depends. With my plan, it would be an extra $25/month ($600 over two years) and then $300 for the phone (total of $900). With Next, I'm paying $750 over two years.
I think I found out that the 10GB+ plans are where you can save a bunch with Next. With the plans with less data, the contract is about even. You just have to do the math on what plan you have.
Apple did right. If you wanted 32gb now you can get 64gb at the 32gb price. If you wanted 16gb, you can 16gb at the normal price. Win win.
I went from 32gb to 16gb now back to 64gb as 16gb is no longer enough.
Good ole' fashion screwing.
Keep the 16GB model at 199 and DOUBLE the 32GB model for the same price to 64GB at 299.
I know Apple is a business and this is obviously to make is seem like you are getting "more for your money" therefore convincing more people to bite the bullet and upgrade to the 299 model when they have been hanging on to the 199 model in the past expecting it to at some point become a starting 32GB standard.
Lineup should read:
199 = 32GB, 299 = 64GB, 399 = 128GB
at the current rates why not:
199 = 16GB, 299 = 64GB, 399 = 256GB ???
-rant over-
Yep! Apple didnt force them to do anything.Some of the justifications in this thread are pretty funny!
Anyone who normally buys 32GB could have saved $100 if Apple did the "expected" thing of making 32GB the base model. That's how I look at it, as opposed to me spending the same $299 and gaining and "extra" 32GB ($299 for 64GB). I didn't need the extra 32GB. So while it's nice to have, I would have rather saved $100 and bought the base model (16GB is too little,a nd 32Gb should have been the base).
So instead of me saving money, Apple "forced" me to spend the same amount as last year to get the minimum storage space I want.
Some of the justifications in this thread are pretty funny!
Anyone who normally buys 32GB could have saved $100 if Apple did the "expected" thing of making 32GB the base model. That's how I look at it, as opposed to me spending the same $299 and gaining and "extra" 32GB ($299 for 64GB). I didn't need the extra 32GB. So while it's nice to have, I would have rather saved $100 and bought the base model (16GB is too little,a nd 32Gb should have been the base).
So instead of me saving money, Apple "forced" me to spend the same amount as last year to get the minimum storage space I want.
Ummm Apple didnt force you to do anything.