Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Clarification

TIVO? Of course not. Pay a monthly fee just to be able to tape shows? That's idiotic to me. And I don't pay for cable either, it's an even bigger ripoff. Let's see, I can pay for cable PLUS tivo every month, or I can just watch Weeds for two bucks an episode. Who's the idiot again? If you watch tons of cable, it may be worth it. But if you don't watch much, it can be WAY cheaper to just buy the episodes.

You must really hate the "idiots" who buy TV shows on DVD (currently the biggest selling DVD content).

If you only watch one or two shows, ITMS is worth it for TV Shows, but I would gather that most individuals watch much more than that. And if you have a family, where you wife and kids watch different programming you can see where it isn't economical to buy all those shows separate.

If you do the math, it is better to buy the lifetime subscription than to pay monthly fees. I did that with TiVo and Sirius. Pay once and never have to worry about additional monthly bills.

When you buy a TV season on DVD, you get much more than what you get from ITMS -- extras, better quality and less likelyhood you will lose what you purchased by not backing it up.
 
ipodG8TR said:
If you only watch one or two shows, ITMS is worth it for TV Shows, but I would gather that most individuals watch much more than that.
Yeah, but that doesn't make the individuals that don't watch a lot of TV and prefer iTMS idiots, as you so kindly labeled us in your previous post.
 
Apple are simply taking it one step further, like the iTMS

Apple are skipping the middle man and becoming distributors themselves.

Imagine subscribing to shows directly from Apple! No more cable/satellite television needed! You subscribe to shows on the "Media Store" and they get downloaded once they're available. So you still pay for them (to Apple, which then pays the networks, instead of you paying the cable/satellite company which then pays the networks), but you never miss a show again (unlike cable/satellite) and you get to see it when you want (like a PVR). The best of both worlds (especially given the added costs of PVR systems/fees). It could even mean the end of TV ads...

After all, a PVR is simply a glorified VHS recorder. You still need to program it for channels, shows, networks, cable/satellite provider... And it'll work, if the cable/satellite provider and/or networks don't cancel/change the time slot for the show you want to watch.

Just as long as Apple lowers the cost... 2.29$CAN per episode per show won't make me switch from my digital TV cable subscription to their system. 🙁

Apple should check the average hours viewed per household, the average prices for cable/satellite packages, and go from there.

I'd like to pay less and get the shows I want, not own them. After all, I'm already paying for cable and I'm not recording everything I'm watching. And on a computer system I'd run out of room pretty soon anyway.

As Steve himself said: music isn't like television... people want to own music and listen to it over and over again. Television? Watch it, then you're done. People who want to own TV shows buy them on DVD. Same goes for movies, which I'd gladly pay to watch at home at the same time it's showing in theaters...
 
Yvan256 said:
Just as long as Apple lowers the cost... 2.29$CAN per episode per show won't make me switch from my digital TV cable subscription to their system. 🙁

Exactly - cost will be a key factor for me as well. $2.29 CAD does not make it worth my while to give up my current setup. 😎
 
gekko513 said:
Yeah, but that doesn't make the individuals that don't watch a lot of TV and prefer iTMS idiots, as you so kindly labeled us in your previous post.

Add to that, I think Apple is feeling pressure from the media outlets that supply iTMS to stay away from a DVR/PVR product.
 
Elgato needs to step up

I'm actually OK with this. To do this right, they really need to be able to emulate all or most of the features your Tivo or cable company's DVR provides. I have a Tivo, an EyeTV 200, and an HD DVR from Time Warner (I got them in that order)... oh, and I have an Archos AV-500, but I don't really use it as a PVR.

The Time Warner box has dual-tuners giving me picture-in-picture and the ability to record HD and all my digital stations. I can also order payperview, etc. I get all of this for $4/mo cheaper than the Tivo+ service. To cram all of this functionality into the mini I think would be impossible.

The problem with the Time Warner DVR is that I can't push shows to my computer where I can burn them or transfer them to my PMP. I can do that with the Elgato EyeTV, but it'll only do analog cable stations.

Elgato needs to step up and provide a next gen EyeTV:
* I think it should have the formfactor and be made of similar materials as the MacMini so it can be stacked ontop or onbottom.
* It should work with the Apple remote for basic navigation and controlling playback.
* It needs to be able to do HD and encrypted digital stations... so it needs a cable card slot (and then the cable providers need to get that tech out to the public). I'd settle for cable card 1.0 tech since I don't order ppv or anything like that. Cable card 2.0 would be nice, but is it even available yet?
* Elgato needs to provide a Tivo-like interface... perhaps they could team with Apple to upgrade Front Row to add EyeTV integration.

These, I feel, would provide the very best solution and it wouldn't push a very good small company out of business.

I'd also like to see an Airport Express stream Video that'd work with this whole setup and have a remote to control it all. Then I can put the Mac in the other room and just have my AX and an HDMI cable. It'd sure clean up the entertainment center.
 
It's not relaly a big deal. If you want PVR, go out and get an eyeTV and connect it to your Mac.

If Apple included one, sure, it would have nice integration, but it would raise the price of Macs. And most Mac users are not buying Macs to be PVRs. Most wouldn't use that feature even if it was free.
 
ipodG8TR said:
If you only watch one or two shows, ITMS is worth it for TV Shows, but I would gather that most individuals watch much more than that.

If you do the math, it is better to buy the lifetime subscription than to pay monthly fees. I did that with TiVo and Sirius. Pay once and never have to worry about additional monthly bills.

You mean if you only watch one or two shows that you can't get otherwise. Part of the reason people can't understand buying from iTunes is because they are stuck in this mindset that thinks you have to do everything the same way instead of mixing and matching. You can watch everything that's on broadcast TV and use iTunes for episodes you missed, episodes you loved and want to rewatch, shows on cable and other content not available elsewhere. That's way cheaper than cable.

Good luck with your TIVO and Sirius subsciptions, you'll be pretty pissed if they go out of business.

I agree with the ideas that Apple should offer subscriptions and package deals for full seasons of shows.

hayesk said:
And most Mac users are not buying Macs to be PVRs. Most wouldn't use that feature even if it was free.

Just like all the Win Media Center owners who got it free on their PC and never use the media features? Just because MS is shipping it doesn't mean people are using it.
 
The mini already is a PVR. It's "tuner" is an IP interface to the iTMS, but I really don't see the difference between that and cable PVRs today that use an IP interface to their network headend. The biggest difference is that iTMS doesn't ask you to pay for a whole load of rubbish content that you don't want just to get the few shows that you do want.

If you find that purchasing shows from iTMS costs you more per month than a cable subscription, you're watching too much TV 😉
 
macnews said:
Can someone please explain to me how EyeTV and El Gato compare to TiVo? First, I haven't used either but from my understanding:

TiVo is like a vcr with a hard drive. You are watching your tv and record it to a hard drive. Than you pay TiVo a monthly fee to be able to access a TV guide type of feature to record shows - yes?

Pretty much.

The thing to remember is that a TV is basically a audio/video device (screen + speakers), coupled with a tuner that receives TV signals, tunes to different channels, and puts the video on the screen and the audio through the speakers.

TiVo intercepts the TV signals and provides you with a programming guide interface that lets you see what shows are on, what's coming up, and lets you record shows that are on now or in the future from this interface. It basically removes the whole "how do I program this damn VCR" problem. It's the program guide interface that is really the useful part - the information about what shows are on and what shows will be on in the near future. That's why you have to purchase a subscription (monthly or lifetime) - you're paying for this information. The hard drive aspect is pretty much immaterial; they could use tapes or whatever as long as you could mark the recorded shows so the TiVo knew what they were. That's the benefit the hard drive provides, it lets TiVo record extra information about what you've recorded so you can easily retrieve it.

Modern digital cable service includes the program guide interface, so people who don't have TiVo don't see the benefit of paying for a TiVo subscription, they just want to be able to record their shows from this interface.

So cable companies now offer DVR as an additional feature, where you get a cable box with a hard drive in it and you can record shows straight from the program interface, just like a TiVo box. You'll also likely pay an extra monthly fee to your cable company for this feature, just like TiVo.

So why bother with TiVo? Well, they've since added "TiVo to Go", where you can connect your TiVo box to a network and get your recorded shows off the box and into your computer. From there you can edit them, archive them, whatever, provided you have software for doing so (I'm not sure what they offer as part of the service, but there's a lot of user-made software I've seen)

Now forget all that for a minute and imagine you're a college student or an apartment dweller and you don't have a lot of room. You've got a computer with a screen and speakers of its own. A TV is just a screen and speakers with a TV tuner. If you can add a TV tuner to your computer, you don't need a bulky TV and you save some space. Elgato's products solve this for Macs, and various solutions have been offered for Windows PCs for a long time, too - the main benefit being that you can watch TV on your computer.

In recent years as hardware has improved, they now let you record shows on your computer, too, and provide program guides (the information about what's on and when), etc. So they kinda do the same stuff that TiVo does, including the "TiVo to Go" stuff that Cable companies aren't about to let you do.

So when people say they want a "TiVo" Mac mini, they're not just asking for something that can record TV shows like a VCR. They're looking for program guide information, and the ability to do something with the shows they record beyond just watching them.

On top of that, advanced cable boxes and other DVR devices have two TV tuners, so you can tune one to a certain channel and record it, and tune the other to a different channel and watch that one. This further removes schedule problems because you don't have to "miss" a show just because it's on at the same time as something else you want to watch. Of course, if there are three shows you want to watch on at the same time, you're up crap creek without a paddle.

So if Apple wanted to create an Apple-quality (simple, easy, good) Mac mini DVR, it would have to have a TV tuner so it could access different TV channels, a simple program guide interface that knew what channels you had, a way to record them, and a way to let you interact with them easily and do stuff with the recorded shows. A bonus would be two TV tuners to let you watch and record stuff at the same time.

This is extremely unlikely.

First, different countries do TV differently, so Apple would have to make different minis with different types of TV tuners for different areas of the world.

Second, Apple would have to have a way for you to tell its program guide interface what channels you get.

Related to that, a lot of people do have cable service, which is pretty much an external TV tuner of itself. If you tune your cable box to one channel, that's what your TV gets. So if you hook your cable box to your imaginary Mac mini, that's what channel it gets. Unless your mini is given a way to tune the cable box, you can't schedule recordings on your mini unless you also remember to program your cable box to switch to the proper channels ahead of time. Elgato basically suffers the same problem; unless it can tune your cable box, you have to program both in order to record anything.

Which, by the way, is why I don't see the point of TiVo anymore. If one has digital cable or satellite, it's better to have the DVR stuff built-in. The only benefit is being able to get your recorded shows onto a computer and do stuff with them.

I guess if you don't have cable (I know a lot of people don't, it's more in cities that everyone would have cable), TiVo makes sense because it does what cable now provides with over-the-air signals. It's kind of like cable for people who don't have cable.

But I digress... So basically, whether you have cable or not, TiVo makes sense if you have a separate TV and computer. Elgato EyeTV makes sense if you want to watch TV on your computer screen. Both give you a program guide and let you record shows, and with TiVo-to-Go, both let you interact with your recorded shows, archiving them or whatever.
 
EyeTV is not a panacea

While I agree that PVR functionality is best left to a company like Elgato, I think a lot of people here who just reply and say that you can slap EyeTV 500 on your Mac and boom instant solution are missing the point.

There is no PVR for the Mac or PC, that I'm aware of, that'll let you record encrypted digital or HD content from cable or satellite. Many of us don't have over the air HD, don't want to erect an antenna, or care about HD stations that are over the air. I can't think of hardly anything over-the-air I really care to record where I absolutely need the HD signal.

This is why so many are hoping for an integrated PVR from Apple.

We need a solution that can record ANY station on cable or satellite and ideally that solution would integrate well with our Macs (or PCs). No one has such a solution, yet.
 
demallien said:
If you find that purchasing shows from iTMS costs you more per month than a cable subscription, you're watching too much TV 😉

Thank you for deciding how much TV we should all watch! 🙄

Yes, iTMS has all the shows I want to watch, you know like House, 24, The Shield, Sopranos... oh wait, they aren't available.

I watch 9 series religiously... many of which are on for only 10-13 episodes per season, so it's more like watching 6 series. So say 6 series at 24 episodes for $2 each... that's only $288. But I would still need cable for news, sports, movies, documentaries, and other TV shows that aren't in my favorite 9 or 10. Ya, iTMS as a replacement for cable isn't even close to being practical.
 
due to the kind of specificities about different countries and channels etc etc mentioned in one of the above posts (thanks for that btw, very useful for people unfamiliar with this field) wouldnt it be better for apple to release a separate 'box' like the mini add ons you can buy for the mac mini, which did all the tv tuning etc stuff, so that can be made to be coutnry specific by apple etc, and can be upgraded / shanged with ease without having to alter the whole mini computer?

Also, why does apple need to do this, isnt it possible for some third company to make such a box for the mini matching its form factor like the HDs and other accessories already out?
 
ccrandall77 said:
While I agree that PVR functionality is best left to a company like Elgato, I think a lot of people here who just reply and say that you can slap EyeTV 500 on your Mac and boom instant solution are missing the point.

There is no PVR for the Mac or PC, that I'm aware of, that'll let you record encrypted digital or HD content from cable or satellite. Many of us don't have over the air HD, don't want to erect an antenna, or care about HD stations that are over the air. I can't think of hardly anything over-the-air I really care to record where I absolutely need the HD signal.

This is why so many are hoping for an integrated PVR from Apple.

We need a solution that can record ANY station on cable or satellite and ideally that solution would integrate well with our Macs (or PCs). No one has such a solution, yet.

This doesn't make any sense to me. What do you mean "ANY station on cable or satellite"? Presumably, someone (let's say me) has cable. If you slap EyeTV 200 on your mac, you can record any channel you can get with the cable box. If you want HD, doesn't your cable box just decrypt the signal and send it to your TV? So couldn't you just send the decrypted signal to your computer in the same manner via EyeTV 500?

If you've bought into the concept of sending encrypted HD to your TV and you have to have a TV (or DVR device or whatever) that is Big Brother-approved to receive encrypted HD signals, that seems to be your problem for accepting all this encryption all over the place.

I know non-HD cable is also largely encrypted, but the cable box decrypts this and everything that comes out of it is decrypted. I wouldn't accept anything less. I'll never switch to HD that I can only watch on certain devices. That'd be like buying CDs that only play on certain players. Rediculous.

Apple's FairPlay is just a hair shy of acceptible since A) you can burn to CD and therefore play the music anywhere, and B) you're not restricted to only FairPlay content on your iPod/iTunes/whatever.

I consider it a benefit that devices like EyeTV 500 and TVMini HD only work with free HD. It really draws into stark relief the problems of digital restrictions.
 
ccrandall77 said:
Thank you for deciding how much TV we should all watch! 🙄

Yes, iTMS has all the shows I want to watch, you know like House, 24, The Shield, Sopranos... oh wait, they aren't available.

I watch 9 series religiously... many of which are on for only 10-13 episodes per season, so it's more like watching 6 series. So say 6 series at 24 episodes for $2 each... that's only $288. But I would still need cable for news, sports, movies, documentaries, and other TV shows that aren't in my favorite 9 or 10. Ya, iTMS as a replacement for cable isn't even close to being practical.

And I thought I watched too much TV, with only Stargate SG-1 and Atlantis. Oh, and MythBusters sometimes. The occasional CSI, Law & Order when I truly can't be bothered to play a game or read. Oh, and the L-Word and some BBC America crime shows and comedies.

All the movies I watch are via Netflix, and a lot of TV shows, too now that I think about it. Another subscription service, so maybe there's a point there. Don't like sports. Documentaries are just another type of movie. News? On TV? You're kidding me! That's what the Internet was invented for! 😛

Thinking about it, it strikes me that what I really want is purely On-Demand cable subscription, like Netflix without the queue, and with everything available as it's released. So, like, I would pay a monthly fee a la Netflix/cable/satellite. Go sit down and see what's available. No schedule guide, just a list of shows, maybe a bookmark list of my favorites, see what the most recent episodes are, have access to all the old ones, and watch whatever I want whenver I want.

Index the subscription fee to bandwidth like Netflix does. I can only get three DVDs at a time, which realistically limits my "bandwidth", the number of minutes of data I can watch in a month. This imaginary on-demand subscription service could do the same. If you watch an average of 2-3 hours of TV/movies a day (that's a lot, I'd think), that makes about 60-90 hours a month. You could purchase a subscription in that range, and when you've hit your limit you can't load anymore shows.

You know, I would never, ever, ever go for music subscriptions. Because I can listen to music anywhere, all the time, and I want a jukebox soundtrack for my daily existence, buying to own works much better.

But I'm just starting to think that a video subscription service done this way (On Demand, certain number of monthly hours) would be perfect. I'd ditch cable and Netflix and sign up instantly. Provided they had the combined content of cable and Netflix. And GreenCine.
 
macnews said:
TiVo is like a vcr with a hard drive. You are watching your tv and record it to a hard drive. Than you pay TiVo a monthly fee to be able to access a TV guide type of feature to record shows - yes?

Well almost. Tivo offers more than recorded TV and TV Guide. I have a series2 Tivo that has been downloading video off the internet (currently just trials, works fine). You can also play music from your PC and view photos from your PC (if you have hooked up your Tivo to a home network). There are a bunch of programs available on the net that offer you podcasting, radio, games, buying movie tickets, weather, traffic, photos on your yahoo account etc. over the net also.
 
Damek said:
But I digress... So basically, whether you have cable or not, TiVo makes sense if you have a separate TV and computer. Elgato EyeTV makes sense if you want to watch TV on your computer screen. Both give you a program guide and let you record shows, and with TiVo-to-Go, both let you interact with your recorded shows, archiving them or whatever.

One more thing - what I would do (if I were going to buy a mini and use it as a media server), since I have a cable box that does DVR, is get an EyeTV 200 but use it only to display what the cable box sends. That way I could have just one screen, connected to the mini, which is connected to the cable/DVR box, and the mini would show everything the cable box is sending. I could even record what the cable box is sending if it's something I really want to share with someone or archive.

The problem there is that everything in the cable box is already encoded (presumably as MPEG-2), so having the EyeTV receive it and encode it as MPEG-2 is basically like converting an MP3 to WAV and then back to MP3 again. Not exactly optimal. But then I'm neither an audiophile or videophile, so I probably wouldn't be bothered by it. And I probably wouldn't do much recording onto the mini, either, I'd chiefly want to save space by not having both a computer screen and a TV. But that's just me.
 
milo said:
You mean if you only watch one or two shows that you can't get otherwise. Part of the reason people can't understand buying from iTunes is because they are stuck in this mindset that thinks you have to do everything the same way instead of mixing and matching. You can watch everything that's on broadcast TV and use iTunes for episodes you missed, episodes you loved and want to rewatch, shows on cable and other content not available elsewhere. That's way cheaper than cable.

So, tell me where can I get my FoodTV "Good Eats" on iTunes? Where can I get Sopranos? Where can I get Doctor Who? Shall I go on? Without cable and my Tivo, and try to depend solely on Broadcast TV and iTunes, I'll be missing out on some of my favorite shows. Are you now giving me the OK to go download them on bittorrent sites?

Even IF iTunes offered these shows, it would NOT be cost effective for me at all, especially @ $1.99 a pop.

milo said:
Good luck with your TIVO and Sirius subsciptions, you'll be pretty pissed if they go out of business.

Tivo and Sirius may (or may not) go out of business, but someone will always offer this kind of service.

milo said:
I agree with the ideas that Apple should offer subscriptions and package deals for full seasons of shows.

I'm totally with you here. iTunes/Apple should DEFINITELY offer some better package deals and/or subscriptions.

milo said:
Just like all the Win Media Center owners who got it free on their PC and never use the media features? Just because MS is shipping it doesn't mean people are using it.

Well, the thing is, these same people who don't use all of the media features. Most of them are using at least one of them and I'll bet you the majority of those users are using the DVR functionality.

w00master
 
YunusEmre said:
Well almost. Tivo offers more than recorded TV and TV Guide. I have a series2 Tivo that has been downloading video off the internet (currently just trials, works fine). You can also play music from your PC and view photos from your PC (if you have hooked up your Tivo to a home network). There are a bunch of programs available on the net that offer you podcasting, radio, games, buying movie tickets, weather, traffic, photos on your yahoo account etc. over the net also.

Yeah, I forgot about all that stuff. Because I just have one screen, no extra TV, that all my stuff plugs into. So for me, none of that is useful. I already have a computer, hooked up to the same screen. If I want to show photos or internet video or whatever, I just flick a button to the computer input instead of the cable input, and voila, the screen is showing my computer stuff.

So basically TiVo is adding computer capabilities to the TiVo for people who don't want to hook their computer up to their TV. It's useful for them, I suppose. Or rather TiVo is adding networking capabilities for people who don't want to hook a computer up to their TV.
 
milo said:
One more time? You should have said that the first time.

OK Mr. reply-to-whole-bunch-of-posts-all-at-once, if only you had time to read my post:

YunusEmre said:
Finaly! This is when I say I told you so.

I hope this will quieten those who have been dreaming about a DVR in a Mac Mini.
 
YunusEmre said:
Well almost. Tivo offers more than recorded TV and TV Guide. I have a series2 Tivo that has been downloading video off the internet (currently just trials, works fine). You can also play music from your PC and view photos from your PC (if you have hooked up your Tivo to a home network). There are a bunch of programs available on the net that offer you podcasting, radio, games, buying movie tickets, weather, traffic, photos on your yahoo account etc. over the net also.

Well said Yunus. Also what I love about my Tivo (as well as my now defunct ReplayTV box), is that if there's a TV show that I'm recording an entire season if, if the time changes... Tivo follows along.

I love it. Those who decry PVR/DVRs really are missing out imho.

w00master
 
Damek said:
So basically TiVo is adding computer capabilities to the TiVo for people who don't want to hook their computer up to their TV. It's useful for them, I suppose. Or rather TiVo is adding networking capabilities for people who don't want to hook a computer up to their TV.

Well, Tivo is already a computer with a pretty decent OS. I'd call it more like a mediacenter box, without windoze. It offers TV via Cable/satellite/RF and video, music, photos, 3rd party applications and more over IP. It's UI is decent and it just works. I aint letting my Tivo go, it is well worth the money.
 
demallien said:
The mini already is a PVR. It's "tuner" is an IP interface to the iTMS, but I really don't see the difference between that and cable PVRs today that use an IP interface to their network headend.

I'll tell you the difference. With the mac you can't watch Scrubs. 🙂

ccrandall77 said:
There is no PVR for the Mac or PC, that I'm aware of, that'll let you record encrypted digital or HD content from cable or satellite.

That's a big part of the problem. Besides broadcast HD and NTSC, there are additional cable box output formats. Not to mention encryption.

If Apple were to make a DVR which format should they support? Every one that is available in the same box? Look how expensive the eyeTV's are that support just one format, imagine what it would cost to handle every possible one. If there were only one video standard, I'm sure Apple would have a DVR already. At this point, if they didn't support every available format, they'd get raked over the coals. Can you blame them for wanting to sit this out until standards become more standard?

w00master said:
So, tell me where can I get my FoodTV "Good Eats" on iTunes?

You can't. As I said, iTunes is a great fit and a money saver for some people, if you watch a ton of cable then it will be worth it. I'm not saying everyone should cancel cable and get iTunes. I'm just saying that the people who save a ton of money by watching broadcast TV and buying a few shows from iTunes aren't idiots.

w00master said:
Tivo and Sirius may (or may not) go out of business, but someone will always offer this kind of service.

True. But someone else offering a similar service doesn't exactly get back the $299 someone spent on Tivo lifetime subscription, does it?

w00master said:
Most of them are using at least one of them and I'll bet you the majority of those users are using the DVR functionality.

Considering how few of the boxes that include Win Media have TV tuners (and can't record TV, I've seen WinMedia included on laptops) I'd tend to doubt that. Without hard numbers, we can only speculate. Anyone find stats on how widely the DVR features of WinMedia are used? Or even what percentage of WinMedia PC's ship with a tuner?

w00master said:
if there's a TV show that I'm recording an entire season if, if the time changes... Tivo follows along.

Except when the network starts the show early or runs it long. But Tivo has added an option to pad record times, right?
 
milo said:
Except when the network starts the show early or runs it long. But Tivo has added an option to pad record times, right?

Tivo added a feature called overlap protection. Tivo website says:

What is Overlap Protection?

Overlap Protection gives you additional options for dealing with recording conflicts. Normally, when two programs overlap by a few minutes, the lower priority recording is cancelled. (For example, one program ends at 8:33, while the next program begins at 8:30) When you turn Overlap Protection on, the DVR automatically clips the lower priority recording by just enough minutes to allow both programs to record.

When scheduling new recordings, the DVR notifies you of any recording conflict and gives you options for resolving it. If the Overlap Protection feature is on, your options include clipping the lower priority program.
 
YunusEmre said:
Well, Tivo is already a computer with a pretty decent OS. I'd call it more like a mediacenter box, without windoze. It offers TV via Cable/satellite/RF and video, music, photos, 3rd party applications and more over IP. It's UI is decent and it just works. I aint letting my Tivo go, it is well worth the money.

But basically it's an interface to a bunch of stuff you get elsewhere. It's a cool interface, and makes sense if you don't already have the same interface elsewhere.

w00master said:
Well said Yunus. Also what I love about my Tivo (as well as my now defunct ReplayTV box), is that if there's a TV show that I'm recording an entire season if, if the time changes... Tivo follows along.

My cable/DVR box does that, too.

And since I just have one big screen to which I have connected both my computer and my cable/DVR box, I don't need a media center box. My computer is my media center box, and when I want to watch TV, I just flick the button on the screen that switches to the TV input, and voila, there's the cable box's interface.

But I'm not arguing against TiVo, I'm just saying that their main business model (program guide interface with DVR function) is irrelevant if you have a DVR digital cable box. The other stuff is cool, and I guess it makes sense if you have a big house and your "entertainment center" in one room and your computer is all separate off to the side - in that case it makes some sense to have a media box hooked up to your TV system that can access music, photos, etc., over the network.

Personally, even in a big house I would prefer to just have a computer hooked up to a screen an speakers and pipe everything through the computer. TiVo boxes may be turning into basic media-dedicated computers, but I wonder why do that when you can just have an actual computer and have more control over it.

I guess TiVo's added benefit in that case is the "it just works" interface. I guess that's why people like the idea of Front Row.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.