Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

No iOS 19: Apple Going Straight to iOS 26

Don't know why people are claiming that this "locks in" a 12 month cycle... If anything, it gives a stronger case to the idea that they could add gap years. Ie, iOS 26 for 2025-26, iOS 28 for 2027-28. Wouldn't have to go in numerical order with this scheme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
I'm sorry but this is brilliant and easy as hell to remember. I love the idea, as I'm not invested in naming conventions.

I want it as simple as possible when the need to answer device questions from techs arises.

No need to drill into Settings to see which OS I'm running.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRSugarD
Just like how Microsoft skipped Windows 9.
Bad decision IMHO. Will just cause more confusion.
I wonder if they'll drop the California names for macOS.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: MRSugarD
Makes more sense for hardware, similar to cars (we used to have it the way for Macs). Many times I’ve had to look up the year certain iPhone or iPad models were built in.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GioGiusi
.wojtek said:
WTH is "vehicle-style numbering"? 😵
Click to expand...
Cars (at least in America) are numbered by model year. These model years are tied to the company's fiscal years. Thus, 2026 car models will be coming out in the Fall of 2025 (first Quarter FY26). So Apple's OS will follow the same nomenclature as car model year numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GioGiusi
Royksöpp said:
Is this an April fools joke?
Click to expand...
I see so many people taken aback by this, to point of posting this same query "is it April fools".

Makes me realize just how rigidly set in their ways some people are. Explains a lot of the consternation that gets posted any time any break from pattern or routine occurs.

Like many people, especially software people, my first response to this is "finally". The numbering has gotten way too high, and Apple was long overdue for a move to yearly versioning/numbering. Hopefully the hardware is next. Nobody wants to buy an iPhone 20. But an iPhone (2026) is going to look just as attractive to buyers as a new vehicles do.
 
I think this is a FABULOUS idea! Also, a GREAT marking idea would be to do the same with the phones. ( shaming people in having old phones.) (Yes, I am a stock holder LOL!
 
Has anyone counted how many versions there have been og Mac Os since Rhapsody?
They called it MacOs 10 for so long that I lost count.
 
DotCom2 said:
I think this is a FABULOUS idea! Also, a GREAT marking idea would be to do the same with the phones. ( shaming people in having old phones.) (Yes, I am a stock holder LOL!
Click to expand...
So am I, but I would rather shame Apple for failing to put out a compelling reason to upgrade those older phones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back