Lol , its not coming . So dont keep ur hopes up. iPad , MBA , and Maybe iMac retina are whats coming ;-)
Booooo!
Lol , its not coming . So dont keep ur hopes up. iPad , MBA , and Maybe iMac retina are whats coming ;-)
gpat said:Calling B.S. on this. Core M processors are out, and I can't imagine Apple doing nothing with them.
What's the difference between Core M and Broadwell?
Re: everyone moaning about Apple's releases so far.
We've seen the thinnest, fastest iPhone released, with a better screen, better camera (with 240fps slow mo), longer battery life. They introduced Apple Pay and last but not least shown off Apple Watch.
This is before the Mac/iPad event! What would it take to satisfy you?!
While I have an Air and love it... the hyperbole is amusing.
[edited]
The rMBP is a half pound heavier and just barely thicker than the thickest point on the Air. To call it bulky and heavy isn't even in the same ballpark as reality. Short battery life? At 9 hours... SHORT??? Give me a break.
Retina Airs don't leave enough differentiation between the Air and Pro line. WhatI can see is either a 12" rMBP replacing the 13" rMBP or an 11" rMBP added to the Pro line.
So a retina MBA would make his comment true around here? Somehow I doubt it.
Rogifan, Broadwell is the new generation of CPUs that replaces Haswell just as Haswell replaced Ivy Bridge which replaced Sandy Bridge. Core M is the bottom rung of performance designation. Performance looks to be Core M, Celeron/Pentium, Core i3, Core i5, Core i7, Xeon.
Given the step down in performance without a significant drop in cost/price, I don't see why Apple would replace a Core i5 with a Core M, and given that MacBook Airs were already minorly updated 6 months ago, it would make more sense for me if Apple waited 3 months to release MacBook Airs with i5 CPUs. Then 9 months after that Apple could potentially release Skylake MBAs with DDR4 memory.
Correct.
And the entry-level Macbook Air would not be a Retina model (at least not anytime soon)
Here are Apple's starting prices for each laptop:
$900 -- 11" Air
$1000 - 13" Air
$1100 - 13" Pro
$1300 - 13" Pro (Retina)
$2000 - 15" Pro (Retina)
I'm having a hard time figuring out how Apple would price a Retina Macbook Air based on their current lineup.
Apple charges a $300 premium for the 13" Retina Pro over the 13" Air... but you're also getting a beefier processor and better graphics to support that Retina screen.
The 13" Retina is half a pound heavier... but I doubt you'd even feel it. It's still considered very light by laptop standards. And while the Air is thinner at its thinnest point... the two are virtually identical at their thickest point. Again... you're not gonna notice it.
I guess my question is... why would we need a Retina Air when the Retina Pro already exists?
Sometimes I wonder if the MacBook Air was simply used as a proof of concept for smaller electronics for a portable system, as well as a study to see how well the new unibody manufacturing process performs.
It doesn't really feel like it has had the attention it deserves (from Apple) since it's introduction. I's almost like the iPad line, and smaller Macbook sizes are taking away more of Apple's attention. But, then again this is just a rumor, and we won't really know the plans until the event is over.
I believe its the single most popular Mac since its introduction. Every year.
No, the original Air, the A1237 and A1304 were complete flops. I only ever saw one while those were still in production - despite being much easier to distinguish from the other Laptop models at the time.I believe its the single most popular Mac since its introduction. Every year.