Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can't tell if you are kidding. Do you not believe that the US corporate tax rate is 35%? Or are you not willing to review the 10Q to verify what I said?

You made the claim so it shouldn't be hard for you to show that Apple paid a 35% tax rate after all deductions and credits using verifiable numbers.....
 
Here is Apple.. a CALIFORNIAN corporation, born and bred in Silicon Valley California... run by Americans, with American educated hires...and they get to claim that all of their foreign income are earned in low tax rate Ireland and therefore should not be subject to American taxes.

Apple is no Californian company. The company headquarter is there but Apple has many many international workers. The world isn't as US centric as you believe it is...
 
Apple is no Californian company. The company headquarter is there but Apple has many many international workers. The world isn't as US centric as you believe it is...

Rubbish. When I buy an Apple product it still says Designed by Apple in California.
Because it is. There's a $5 billion spaceship being built in Cupertino to prove it. They make and design all their products in America, outsource what they can elsewhere, where cheaper, and sell to the rest of the world.

But it is still Designed by Apple in California.
 
You made the claim so it shouldn't be hard for you to show that Apple paid a 35% tax rate after all deductions and credits using verifiable numbers.....
Just seems weird that you need me to verify something that nobody is questioning.

Here is the 2015 10-K.
http://investor.apple.com/sec.cfm?DocType=Annual&ndq_keyword=

(in millions)
Operating income for Americas: 31,186
Current federal taxes: 11,730

So their tax rate on US Income was $37.6%.
 
Obama got a Nobel Peace, so those prizes are worthless.

Taxation is morally wrong, unless someone else is paying.
Apple is avoiding taxes legally.
If Ireland doesn't offer the best deal, another country will.

Next US president should lower taxes (as much as possible) and don't charge a dime to bring money from overseas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: webbuzz
Obama got a Nobel Peace, so those prizes are worthless.

Taxation is morally wrong, unless someone else is paying.
Apple is avoiding taxes legally.
If Ireland doesn't offer the best deal, another country will.

Next US president should lower taxes (as much as possible) and don't charge a dime to bring money from overseas.

Legal =/= Morality
How many Nobel Prizes do you have? Get one if it's so worthless, I dare you.
So in that alternate universe, who pays for your military and roads and bank bailouts and everything that screams out 'America!'?
 
Legal =/= Morality
How many Nobel Prizes do you have? Get one if it's so worthless, I dare you.
So in that alternate universe, who pays for your military and roads and bank bailouts and everything that screams out 'America!'?

Private sector made roads/railways, banks, security, communications and everything before government came to "help and regulate". Even the church helped the poor before wasteful benefits came.

Best thing government can do is get out of the way.
 
This is the problem that I have with that. If I was an American citizen, and I make money elsewhere...anywhere in the world, I would be taxed at the US rate for my WORLDWIDE income... it makes zero regard of where I made that money. After all, I took advantage of American education, economy, skill, land... in order to position myself to be able to make all that income.
Unless, of course, you open a foreign corporation to handle your foreign business like Apple did. Nothing real nefarious here.
 
I cant believe this nonsense is still going on

I dont come up with some crazy scheme to not pay 30% to apple for everything we sell on the app store. That is the price of doing business there. 30% of revenue not even of profits!

Just like I know what are my NYC, NYS and fed tax rates... Again, the cost of doing business here. This is not a secret - apple knew what the USA taxes were. Change the law and have them pay up - I'm ok with negotiating a lower rate for the future (or amnesty for US companies in financial trouble) but they pay the old rate on profits up to this point.

Love how all these companies take advantage of our infrastructure to make billions - and later want to skip on The bill. If this country is so bad why are they not building their donut in Ireland
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
Just seems weird that you need me to verify something that nobody is questioning.

Here is the 2015 10-K.
http://investor.apple.com/sec.cfm?DocType=Annual&ndq_keyword=

(in millions)
Operating income for Americas: 31,186
Current federal taxes: 11,730

So their tax rate on US Income was $37.6%.

Hmmm......I thought the whole point was to transfer the IP to an Irish subsidiary then licence it back to Apple US and take a Tax Deduction on the licencing fee?
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
Either lower the corporate tax to encourage companies to keep their cash in the US, or just cut the crap and find a way to seize it or tax them to death like the gov really wants.

Has this guy left his desk to actually build something or does he decide to call fraud just from his ivory tower without ever getting his hands dirty?


Sigh... username checks out
 
Apple is no Californian company. The company headquarter is there but Apple has many many international workers. The world isn't as US centric as you believe it is...
Sweet. If only I'd been taxed @ 17℅ as an Apple employee.
 
I wonder who is more knowledgeable in issues like this, Nobel winning economist or a bunch of anonymous Apple shareholders on Macrumors forum ...
I'm sure he's knowledgable but his "fraud" statement is a political one, not one of a legal standing.

He has a perspective that one can agree with or not. But that's all it is, his perspective. Read some of his papers. They're hot-linked at his name in the OP.

If the Bloomberg article accurately posted the interview, he should lose any credibility as an objective economist that he's been afforded. Then again, his papers should've been convincing enough beforehand.
 
No. The point is to minimize taxes on foreign income.

I don't think so, Apple gets to include the Licensing fee in the cost of production per unit sold. Nations don't Tax the gross sales price of a unit, only the profit made off that unit. The Licensing fee, is a fee owed to Apple Ireland, it's not profit for Apple US. It is a cost to manufacture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
Exactly. What law did Apple break?

Okay, the issue isn't Ireland as such. It's just that nations like Ireland and Luxembourg have the lowest corporation tax rates around in order to facilitate this.

Apple subsidiaries in higher corporation tax nations pay bogus royalty fees to Apple subsidiaries in lower corporation tax nations in order to generate profits in countries where it will be taxed less.

It's not just Apple and it's not just Ireland, but the royalty fee is bogus and purely a mechanism to avoid paying taxes. Whether or not it's fraudulent is up for debate, but I definitely understand why a Noble Prize winning Economist may think so. It gets very difficult to put a stop to scams like this when business and politics are so closely linked. I doubt there are many regimes that would like to take on Apple/Google/Starbucks et al with the values of money at stake, but when a major nation does, the rest will follow suit.
 
I don't think so, Apple gets to include the Licensing fee in the cost of production per unit sold. Nations don't Tax the gross sales price of a unit, only the profit made off that unit. The Licensing fee, is a fee owed to Apple Ireland, it's not profit for Apple US. It is a cost to manufacture.
I'm don't know where any of your info is coming from. How much is this license fee that you speak of?

To over-simplify the situation, Apple formed another corporation in Ireland (actually more than one). Let's call it Bob. All income from outside the Americas goes into Bob. The US can't tax that income until Apple chooses to take the income out of Bob.

The patent licensing just enables Bob to conduct business using Apple's IP.
 
That's because it IS fraud. Apple doesn't want to pay it's share of taxes and never will because nobody cares to hold them accountable. Worse yet, this thread WILL have fanboys being apologetic about it and defending Apple....

Think about that; cheering on a corporation worth billions that evades taxes.
Do you have an accountant? Do you file for any tax write offs? Do you want to pay less taxes and not more? Are you doing any or all of these things legally? If you answer YES then you are doing the same things that Apple does. Why don't you pay your fair share?
[doublepost=1469819229][/doublepost]



Joseph-Stiglitz-250x250.jpeg
Joseph Stiglitz, an economic professor at Columbia University and 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, has described Apple's tax arrangements in Ireland as "a fraud" in a recent interview with Bloomberg TV.Under current U.S. laws, Apple is able to shift billions of dollars in profits to Ireland, where it operates multiple subsidiaries, sheltering those earnings from up to a 35 percent corporate tax rate in the United States. Ireland has a much lower corporate tax rate of 12.5 percent, but Apple is believed to have a sweetheart deal with Ireland that sees it pay less than 2 percent in exchange for creating jobs in the country.

Apple has been the subject of a European Commission probe related to its Irish tax arrangements since June 2014, with the executive body investigating whether the deal constitutes illegal state aid. Ireland's finance minister Michael Noonan recently said he expects a decision to be reached by September or October, and Apple could owe more than $8 billion in back taxes depending on the outcome.

Apple insists it is the largest taxpayer in the world and that it pays every cent of tax it owes under current laws. In a late 2015 interview with 60 Minutes correspondent Charlie Rose, Apple CEO Tim Cook described tax avoidance accusations against the company as "political crap," adding that the United States has a tax code that is "awful for America" and "made for the industrial age."

Apple-EU.jpg

Apple provided the following statement during its March 2016 meeting with the European Parliament's tax committee:Apple is only one of several multinational corporations that have been scrutinized for possible corporate tax avoidance in Europe over the past few years, with others including Amazon, Google, IKEA, and McDonald's. Last year, the European Commission ordered Starbucks and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles to each pay up to EUR30 million in back taxes, after ruling that the companies benefited from illegal tax deals.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Nobel-Winning Economist Calls Apple's Irish Tax Arrangement 'Fraud'
This is just another form of the patent law debate. Apple plays by the rules of a broken or unjust system the same way most others do. They play the best and win the most so that makes them the biggest target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tgara
I'm don't know where any of your info is coming from. How much is this license fee that you speak of?

To over-simplify the situation, Apple formed another corporation in Ireland (actually more than one). Let's call it Bob. All income from outside the Americas goes into Bob. The US can't tax that income until Apple chooses to take the income out of Bob.

The patent licensing just enables Bob to conduct business using Apple's IP.

Ok, we're both kind of right, Apple can't write off IP licensed back to Apple US, however:

Typically, a company arranges for the rights to exploit intellectual property outside the United States to be owned by an offshore company, which then enters into a cost sharing agreement between the American parent, written strictly in terms of American transfer pricing rules. The offshore company continues to receive all of the profits from exploitation of the rights outside the American, but without paying American tax on the profits unless and until they are remitted to the United States of America.[6]

It is called double Irish because two Irish companies are used in the arrangement. One of these companies is tax resident in a tax haven, such as the Cayman Islands orBermuda. Irish tax law currently provides that a company is tax resident where its central management and control is located, not where it is incorporated, so that it is possible for the first Irish company not to be tax resident in Ireland. This company is the offshore entity which owns the valuable non US rights that are then licensed to a second Irish company (and this one is tax resident in Ireland) in return for substantial royalties or other fees. The second Irish company receives income from the use of the asset in countries outside the United States, but its taxable profits are low because the royalties or fees paid to the first Irish company are tax-deductible expenses. The remaining profits are taxed at the Irish rate of 12.5%.

For companies whose ultimate ownership is located in the United States, the payments between the two related Irish companies might be non-tax-deferrable and subject to current taxation as Subpart F income under the Internal Revenue Service's controlled foreign corporation regulations if the structure is not set up properly. This is avoided by organizing the second Irish company as a fully owned subsidiary of the first Irish company resident in the tax haven, and then making an entity classification election for the second Irish company to be disregarded as a separate entity from its owner, the first Irish company. The payments between the two Irish companies are then ignored for American tax purposes.[1]
 
Obama won a Noble, how many people has his administration killed? So maybe the Noble isn't what it used to be? Apple's one and only objective is to produce results for it's share holders. Searching for and finding a place with lower taxes helps that objective.

If you're gonna criticize Obama, at least learn to spell the name of the prize you despise. It'll make your post sound more informed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.