apple has waited too long
Wow! Why didn't someone tell me Rob Enderle was on MacRumors?
apple has waited too long
"MacRumors" should change its name to "TechRumours" or "PossibleCompetition." This article should be Page 2 and even that is stretching it.
![]()
MP3 players weren't that big when the iPod launched with really little to no exposure outside the geekland and it's fringes. Similar smartphones have really been limited to RIMing businessmen only a few short years ago.
what's a good guess for how much this will cost?
Under 500?
Under 400?
I've seen people around with them: students. They were all using the exact same model. For my part, I use pen tablets (e.g. Wacom) instead. I've been doing so for a while. The ability to copy diagrams and graphs while still retaining the speed and clarity of typed words is fantastic.Except for the fact that there are dozens of tablets already on the market. Guess why you never see anyone around with them.
Apple has one single model of phone (not counting the various revisions that model has gone through). They're new to the market yet still seem to be maintaining their hype, and they're locked to a single carrier (in the United States and in other countries where doing so is legal). Apple may not be blowing Nokia away in terms of raw marketshare, but by many other metrics you could make the claim that Apple blew everyone away and you'd be right.Wait, Apple blew Nokia away ? By having 1/3 their market share ? I'm sure Nokia feels really "blown away" by a 3rd rate competitor (RIM is in 2nd place with half of Nokia's market share).
Also, the iPod wasn't an instant hit, not because like you say it was limited to geeks (it wasn't), but because it initially didn't ship with Windows drivers at all. You needed a Mac to have an iPod.
I've seen people around with them: students. They were all using the exact same model. For my part, I use pen tablets (e.g. Wacom) instead. I've been doing so for a while. The ability to copy diagrams and graphs while still retaining the speed and clarity of typed words is fantastic.
The hardware was pretty well established, but has still made advances. The first tablet I used was terrible; I now use a Wacom Bamboo that is a total pleasure to use,
Right you are on this account, I remember the introduction of the iPod like it was yesterday. It was initially for Mac only and it was quite steep in price compared for the storage one got. Then it was updated and still no Windows support. Finally it was released to the Windows community and the price dropped from there onwards and it took off gradually. No over night success here. Remember the Cube.![]()
That's revisionist history at its best. First, the iPhone is not much smarter than the "dumb" phones. This is extensively discussed in that other thread about the Japanese market.
I don't get what you're actually going to do with a Tablet, even Apple's.
I mean iPhone makes sense to get your calls, emails, etc, and through on a few fun items. It can be taken with you.
However, a tablet, you aren't going to pull out of your pocket everywhere you go, and yet it's not practical for word processing and the like.
So what in the world do you use it for???
Yes all these things technically existed well before Apple had crack at them. For the general public they might as well have not existed even if the phone they replaced with the iPhone had all those features and even more that they just never used. Either they didn't know or the device felt so alien to them that the idea it had lots of tricky things it could do as well didn't even occur to them.
No WiFi n? How lame is that?
No WiFi n? How lame is that?
<snip>
How do I enable 802.11n on the iPhone or iPod Touch again ?
Except for the fact that, even with the advances in lower power consumption, lower thermal output and higher computing, these still won't be capable of the performance levels of current tablets.You seem to assume that these new devices, whether from Apple or somebody else, are going to perform exactly like the existing ones. These are not going to be tablets as we currently know them, they're likely to be more like Star Trek's 'Padd.'
Um, what? MP3 players were already becoming popular long before the iPod was released (or even before it had been announced). In fact, the iPod didn't even truly take off until Apple finally provided Windows support. Even then, I'd say it was more the combination of the iPod and iTunes that drove the iPod's success. Most of the other music management options used by MP3 players at the time were fairly lackluster.MP3 players weren't that big when the iPod launched with really little to no exposure outside the geekland and it's fringes. Similar smartphones have really been limited to RIMing businessmen only a few short years ago.
The iPhone is already available from multiple carriers in numerous markets across the world. It will be interesting though to see what occurs if/when Apple goes to a multi-carrier model in the US.It'll be interesting to see what happens when Apple diversifies their phone lineup and they're no longer locked to single carriers.
That was probably the third generation of iPod (around 2003), which is when Apple first began shipping the iPods labeled either for PC or Mac.I remember buying one for windows - they came pre-formatted either for windows or mac. I had to buy a mac one and re-format it, and use winamp with some gunky plug-in to synch. Replaced by Creative mp3 player that looked like a portable CD player.
That was probably the third generation of iPod (around 2003), which is when Apple first began shipping the iPods labeled either for PC or Mac.
The first generation was Mac-only, and the second generation was Mac-only out of the box, but you could use MusicMatch with Windows to transfer music to it (ugh, MusicMatch though...)
apple has waited too long
exactly what i was thinking as well.
if apple is really planning on competing with e-readers like the Kindle with their tablet they should have announced their product before Christmas - the Amazon Kindle has posted the highest monthly sales yet and we are only 3 weeks into this month.
many would have held out for the apple tablet but now will be owning a Kindle, or Nook, or Sony e-reader...
Except both those markets were already big hits in and of themselves. They entered markets where there were tons of opportunity. The problem with tablets is that... well.. they don't sell well and aren't very popular. If Apple does make a tablet, it will have to really be something to fit in that niche between a laptop and a PMP while being better than a netbook.