Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Fantastic....oh wait....none of that really works outside the US. I can get movie times, but no booking. You can get local restaurants, but again, no booking. So its a glorified/lazy google maps search for most of us.

There's a house for sale down the street from me. I can get their contact number for you.
 
Siri's biggest problem, IMO, is lack of common sense intelligence. I ask it to call my fiancé, who is literally 80% of my phone calls. It brings up 5 results for people whose names start with the same letter :confused: Probably the most infuriating is when I'm driving and am dictating a text message. I'll get all the way to "Would you like me to send it?" and it just stops listening and cancels the whole thing. Major road rage. :mad::mad:

I guess the alternative is Google, which literally combs through your stuff. Seriously - thanks for tracking my FedEx package, but it's creepy that they pulled that out of my email without asking :mad:
 
I love Apple, but face it, Siri's voice recognition is way behind Google. And until they allow developers to integrate their apps, it'll remain a one-trick pony.

Exactly. It's a shame as developers have been able to tap into Siri's potential. SiriProxy has been around for a while, some have used it in conjunction with Philip's Hue, allowing Siri to turn lights on/off, change colors, etc. This is one instance the "walled garden"/application sandboxing is hurting Apple's development.

I hope Cook was sincere with his recent statement re: opening up iOS further for developers. The lack of access to iOS native apps/functions isn't helping.
 
I wouldn't brag about that given that Siri has been sat and left to die since the day it was launched, with no compelling new features, fixes or improvements being launched other than (IIRC) a baseball card or something.

Agreed.

I've been finding Google Voice to be a little bit more intuitive
 
Siri is much better at what it is meant to do than Google's. However, Google's interface being on-device and not server based tips it in Google's favor alone. Its that huge.

I've found Siri does a better job understanding my queries when it works. Its featureset has grown in 2 years, but not enough. It needs integration with third party apps. It needs on-device understanding.
 
Does anyone *but* Nuance do this? Speech recognition isn't really a "roll your own" thing, and the few who try are usually bought by Nuance.
 
Siriously, when will Apple add multi-tasking to iOS?

I would expect that to appear some time in 2010 when ever they finally release iOS 4. ;)

On the other hand, Siri can be lots of fun:

Me: "Have you ever taken the Turing Test? And please don't search the web for it."
Siri: "I don't understand 'Have you ever taken the two ring test and please don't search the web for it' would you like me to search the web for it?"
:D
 
Siri sucks because it tries to guess what you're trying to say, where as diction is great because it's just recognizing your speech.
 
Anyone care to ask Siri when Apple is going to do something great again? I just asked Google, it laughed and forwarded me to a picture of Steve....
 
because siri's voice recognition sucks for everything other than routine commands... try telling it to play a song by an artist in your ipod or telling it to get you information on a movie - it sucks.

uhm thats what i meant? why would they admit to be responsible for such a beta product

--

this is supposed to say "Play a song by Justin Timberlake"
gotta love siri

5vyp86.png


end of the story i had to turn siri off because if i hear "want me to search the web?" one more time im going to throw my iphone against the wall.
 
Last edited:
All I know is: Nuance owns Swype.

Hopefully there is more to come from this partnership.
 
I actually like Siri and often get good results, unlike most people on here it seems.

However, I wish Siri had offline support. When I'm underground on the subway, Siri doesn't work at all. When I'm in a low-coverage 3G area, or worse 2G, Siri sometimes fails or takes way too long. Obviously I don't expect Siri to look up info for me offline, but surely it can dial a number or send a text or add something to my reminders app without an internet connection.

I believe Android has this, it can handle dictation and simple commands offline. I wish Siri could too.

----------

uhm thats what i meant? why would they admit to be responsible for such a beta product

--

this is supposed to say "Play a song by Justin Timberlake"
gotta love siri

Image

end of the story i had to turn siri off because if i hear "want me to search the web?" one more time im going to throw my iphone against the wall.

Do you have Siri set to Dutch or something?
 
because siri's voice recognition sucks for everything other than routine commands... try telling it to play a song by an artist in your ipod or telling it to get you information on a movie - it sucks.

I get it that YMMV, but these examples work 99.9% of the time just fine, even with headphones and walking in busy Manhattan traffic.

There is a lot of FUD in this thread.

By the way, the integration with Wolfram is fantastic.
 
I actually like Siri and often get good results, unlike most people on here it seems.

However, I wish Siri had offline support. When I'm underground on the subway, Siri doesn't work at all. When I'm in a low-coverage 3G area, or worse 2G, Siri sometimes fails or takes way too long. Obviously I don't expect Siri to look up info for me offline, but surely it can dial a number or send a text or add something to my reminders app without an internet connection.

I believe Android has this, it can handle dictation and simple commands offline. I wish Siri could too.

----------



Do you have Siri set to Dutch or something?

German but that doesnt change the fact that it should recognize english artists or songs if i want to use the music control feature. english words work fine on google now. siri needs to be bilingual
 
I get it that YMMV, but these examples work 99.9% of the time just fine, even with headphones and walking in busy Manhattan traffic.

There is a lot of FUD in this thread.

By the way, the integration with Wolfram is fantastic.

99%? Maybe in the US, everywhere else its more realistically 40%. Quick example - I'm in North London, United Kingdom. I have an Asda Walmart about 5 miles away. Here's what Siri said just now:

attachment.php


Words fail me. How the hell did it decide that it wanted to look in Texas?!
 
99%? Maybe in the US, everywhere else its more realistically 40%. Quick example - I'm in North London, United Kingdom. I have an Asda Walmart about 5 miles away. Here's what Siri said just now:

Words fail me. How the hell did it decide that it wanted to look in Texas?!

Mine isn't as bad as yours. It's managed to stay in England though it's found the Bristol store which is 70 miles away and ignored the one in Birmingham that's only 15 miles away. :rolleyes:

Photo 30-05-2013 21 08 00.png
 
Last edited:
Siri for me, is an overrated and under performing utility which I never use for the latter reason.

----------

99%? Maybe in the US, everywhere else its more realistically 40%. Quick example - I'm in North London, United Kingdom. I have an Asda Walmart about 5 miles away. Here's what Siri said just now:

attachment.php


Words fail me. How the hell did it decide that it wanted to look in Texas?!

Yes. Pretty useless in the UK and France.
 
Maybe these complaints are why

They kept it off the iPhone 4 ?? I don't know why they limited it to 4S and 5.

I am still a bit flabbergasted that Maps doesn't provide turn-by-turn directions on the iPhone 4.
Google Maps does. It's not the hardware, the iPhone 4 is up to it... it was a seemingly arbitrary decision.

I have great experiences with Maps but the trouble of course is the reliance on incomplete data from Yelp for places. Not every place is on Yelp.

Google simply had a gargantuan head start with the data for everything.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.