Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The titan is if you use extreme resolutions and have little need for high FPS. But this also adds dirvers for the 10XX series, so now you could use the 1080 ti in theory. It wouldn't work before.
Isn't this just a rebranding of the Titan Pascal?
 
12 FLOPS?
Should probably be 12 TFLOPS.
Exactly the line that pulled me to the comments. I'm honestly not sure how far back you'd have to go to find a computer limited to 12 FLOPS of graphics compute ability. 90's?
 
Last edited:
Isn't this just a rebranding of the Titan Pascal?

Not really sure I understand your question. The 1080 Ti is less hardware than the Titan Pascal. They removed components in the 1080 Ti that isn't needed when powering less screen, but still gave it more GPU performance in exchange. This is how the price was reduced. I'm not familiar with anyone using the Pascal GPU's in Macs. The 980 Ti was the last high end one that I saw used. But that isn't Pascal.
 
Considering how old the tower Mac Pro that supports this card is, and how expensive the card is, I guess this makes more sense for a Hackintosh than a real Mac.

Those old 2009-2012 Mac Pros still have x16 PCIe slots, though. With more and more heavy processing tasks migrating to GPU, the ability to run a Pascal card with native drivers is going to extend the life of those systems at least a bit longer.
 
This could be HUGE for upcoming Macs. Everyone always says "you can't game on a Mac". Well this would put that to rest, and it would incentivize more developers to create Mac titles as well. Awesome to see.

I like the way you say "HUGE" because this card is. Which Apple computer do you see this card being able to plug into?
 
This could be HUGE for upcoming Macs. Everyone always says "you can't game on a Mac". Well this would put that to rest, and it would incentivize more developers to create Mac titles as well. Awesome to see.

Game developers have stopped making games for Mac because Apple refuses to keep their OpenGL current. Plus, Direct X.

Besides, a card such as this would only be available with a yet-to-be-redesigned Mac Pro, not an iMac. Is the average Apple consumer going to pay Mac Pro level prices just to get a machine that carries a gamer-level graphics card? My guess is no.

That said, the Titan Xp is really overkill for gaming. NVIDIA offers cards like the 1080 Ti that are half the price and can do roughly the same performance. You're literally paying $100 per 1% increase in performance above $600.
 
Exactly the line that pulled me to the comments. I'm honestly not sure how far back you'd have to go to find a computer with 12 FLOPS of graphics compute ability. 90's?

Probably a lot earlier, maybe the 50's or so.
I just found this, about a calculator needing 10 FLOPS, and calculators have been there long before computers.

For comparison, a handheld calculator performs relatively few FLOPS. A computer response time below 0.1 second in a calculation context is usually perceived as instantaneous by a human operator,[10] so a simple calculator needs only about 10 FLOPS to be considered functional.
 
Sorry, you both have it wrong..

The Titan is a 7-series card
Titan X is a 9-series card (Maxwell) Edit, could ALSO be a Pascal based card
Titan Xp is a 10-series card (Pascal)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#GeForce_900_series

Edit: There were 2 Titan X Cards?! Never mind, I learned something today. Sorry guys!

What a confusing mess

Oh yeah.

There was the Titan X (Maxwell), then the Titan X (Pascal). People started calling the Pascal card the Titan XP to make discussions clear. How din NVIDEA respond? They released the Titan Xp ( with a lower case "p"). Clearly no one told them that the first rule of sales is don't make it hard to discuss your products.
 
What's the point of having such an expensive and powerful GPU with no software or games to utilize it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.